A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Best dogfight gun?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 21st 04, 11:43 PM
Matt Clonfero
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Tony
Williams wrote:

Yep. And if you eliminate the missiles and the plane's radar too,
you'll save most of the cost of the weapon system!

Military aircraft are extremely expensive to purchase, maintain and
train for. It makes no sense to save a tiny percentage of the
whole-life costs of acquiring an aircraft system if by doing so you
remove a useful, if secondary, military capability.


Oh, I quite agree with your point - the whole life cost saving of
deleting the gun is negligible when compared with the WLC of the whole
system. My issue is with people who say that you don't save much, in
absolute terms - because you do.

Aetherem Vincere
Matt
--
To err is human
To forgive is not
Air Force Policy
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AIM-54 Phoenix missile Sujay Vijayendra Military Aviation 89 November 3rd 03 09:47 PM
P-39's, zeros, etc. old hoodoo Military Aviation 12 July 23rd 03 05:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.