![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Tony
Williams wrote: Yep. And if you eliminate the missiles and the plane's radar too, you'll save most of the cost of the weapon system! Military aircraft are extremely expensive to purchase, maintain and train for. It makes no sense to save a tiny percentage of the whole-life costs of acquiring an aircraft system if by doing so you remove a useful, if secondary, military capability. Oh, I quite agree with your point - the whole life cost saving of deleting the gun is negligible when compared with the WLC of the whole system. My issue is with people who say that you don't save much, in absolute terms - because you do. Aetherem Vincere Matt -- To err is human To forgive is not Air Force Policy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIM-54 Phoenix missile | Sujay Vijayendra | Military Aviation | 89 | November 3rd 03 09:47 PM |
P-39's, zeros, etc. | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 12 | July 23rd 03 05:48 AM |