![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 3:13*pm, Andy wrote:
On Jun 11, 7:13*am, Frank Whiteley wrote: http://www.ssa.org/myhome.asp?mbr=67...w=blog&id=2001 I doubt there is a case for an appeal. I can't agree with you. *There appears to be nothing in the kit itself that says a constest number is not allowed to be used. *A discussion or posting on RAS does not make a rule. *A note on the SSA website does not make a rule. *A notice in the Soaring magazine does not make a rule. *The rules are included in the kit and specifically in the SC summary: Declaration content a. Date of flight. b. Name of the pilot-in-command, and the flight crew if any (see Annex C, para 6.3c). c. Glider type, and its registration or serial number or unique NAC- assigned contest number. d. The make, model and serial number of the FR used (as recorded in the .igc file for the flight). For any barograph or GPS position recorder used, the make, model and serial number as verified by the OO before flight. If something else is to be enforced then the kit itself must be changed. Perhaps the kit should include the statement "All observers and badge applicants shall read all past issues of Soaring Magazine and shall browse all postings on RAS or the SAA website since anything published there shall take precedence over the rules published in this kit". Andy Ah this has already been well covered in this thread, but here goes again. A careful reading of SC3 and SC3c shows this is spelt out. SC3 4.2.1 "Declaration content a. blah blah... .... c. Glider type, and its registration or serial number or unique NAC-assigned contest number. d. blah blah..." Here I read this as clearly intended to mean "unique"to the glider not pilot since it is in the context of Glider type and its' registration. But what I think does not matter, as any doubt is removed in SC3 Annex C 6.3c that clarifies this rule... "[blah blah blah....] Not all NACs issue competition numbers or require them to be unique to a glider – the glider registration or its serial number must then be used." So the sporting code is pretty clear that the intent is you need to use the a unique glider ID, the SSA Contest ID does not appear to qualify. And I as posted previously by Eric Mann this has been apparently been hashed over between the IGC and SSA. So lets make progress and agree that this is the current rule. Next question is does this has an unreasonable impact on badges and records, and the promotion of soaring, in the USA and a solution needs to be found? (count me as a "yes" on that). Darryl |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 3:49*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:
But what I think does not matter, as any doubt is removed in SC3 Annex C 6.3c that clarifies this rule... "[blah blah blah....] Not all NACs issue competition numbers or require them to be unique to a glider – the glider registration or its serial number must then be used." Is that rule included in the SSA kit? Is that interpretation of the validity of SSA issued contest numbers included in the SSA kit? If not, and I can't find either, then I stand by what I posted. Andy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 4:09*pm, Andy wrote:
On Jun 11, 3:49*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote: But what I think does not matter, as any doubt is removed in SC3 Annex C 6.3c that clarifies this rule... "[blah blah blah....] Not all NACs issue competition numbers or require them to be unique to a glider – the glider registration or its serial number must then be used." Is that rule included in the SSA kit? Is that interpretation of the validity of SSA issued contest numbers included in the SSA kit? If not, and I can't find either, then I stand by what I posted. Andy SSA Kit? I have no idea what the "SSA Kit" is. Ah tell me you are not reading the SSA provided sporting code summary and thinking this is the only thing you need to read? right? And you are not thinking this is the definite document on the badge rules for the SSA? If people have this impression then the SSA summary ought to be removed from the SSA web site or fixed - for a start it seems to not mention the USA/ SSA hot issue that is the topic of this thread. There are many guide documents and simple versions of badge/records forms that seem to do more harm than good in this area. It is better to send people to the actual documents.). The SSA Badge Web site does link to the set of SC3 documents including SC3 and Annex C. Its the first link at the top of the badge documents page. But regardless of anything else you read the formal FAI badge rules are defined by the FAI sporting code SC3 and additional clarification in SC3c, whether that is in any "SSA Kit" is irrelevant-- the SSA does not get to change the actual sporting code. Besides being written in SC3 in what I believe is clear English, I've pointed out the very straightforward clarification in SC3 Annex C and last year both the chair of the badge and records committee and Judy worked to point out this issue, including on r.a.s. I understand that this may be missed on the first readings, and (as I do) you may not agree with it, but it is there plain as day. The more useful issue to worry about is the rule is a poor one and should be fixed/mitigated/worked around/ignored by the NAC/etc. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trying for a Diamond Goal tommorow - water ballast question | Scott Alexander[_2_] | Soaring | 27 | April 29th 10 09:28 PM |
Distance to Goal Flight in Texas | ryanglover1969[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | March 10th 10 09:45 PM |
Diamond D-Jet First Flight | Montblack | Piloting | 5 | April 21st 06 04:00 PM |
Diamond Distance flight plan | 303SAM | Soaring | 6 | April 4th 06 12:21 AM |
PW-5 Diamond Goal Flights | Dick Johnson | Soaring | 2 | November 17th 03 01:44 AM |