![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/06/10 01:47, Mxsmanic wrote:
Hatunen writes: Do you suppose your typical lieutenant taking simulator training will be allowed to become a tank commander without actually ever having been in a tank? It's certainly conceivable, but I don't know if it is actually done. Do you know, I do believe the idiot thinks he's right. Which is possibly the scariest thing I have thought in a very long time... -- William Black These are the gilded popinjays and murderous assassins of Perfidious Albion and they are about their Queen's business. Any man who impedes their passage does so at his own peril. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Myers writes:
But the simulator experience you're talking about is absolutely meaningless without real-world flight experience. I don't share that opinion, nor is it widely held. In fact, it's possible to pursue simulation as an end in itself. It does have certain advantages that real flight does not. For that matter, the "simulator" in your case really isn't one. It's a computer game, something which is VERY far removed from what the airlines call a simulator. Clearly, it's been a long time since you last used a desktop simulator. It is, in fact, absolutely nothing like a real simulator, and essentially useless for meaningful flight training. The U.S. military disagrees with you, and has for the past decade (that is, through several versions of MSFS). So do many pilots, flight schools, and instructors. In general, it can be said that anyone who absolutely dismisses or worships flight simulation is misguided or has some sort of ax to grind. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Bob Myers writes: But the simulator experience you're talking about is absolutely meaningless without real-world flight experience. I don't share that opinion, nor is it widely held. In fact, it's possible to pursue simulation as an end in itself. It does have certain advantages that real flight does not. For that matter, the "simulator" in your case really isn't one. It's a computer game, something which is VERY far removed from what the airlines call a simulator. Clearly, it's been a long time since you last used a desktop simulator. Wrong again. And to think that you were just complaining that *I* had no idea what *you* knew. Mr, Pot, meet Mr. Kettle. MSFS is a computer game. It is by no stretch of the imagination a "flight simulator" in the sense of something that would actually be useful for flight instruction, except possibly re some very basic procedures training. The U.S. military disagrees with you, and has for the past decade (that is, through several versions of MSFS). So do many pilots, flight schools, and instructors. No, they don't disagree with me at all. I know what they're using that game for - do you? And just how many pilot certificates have been awarded based on MSFS hours, do you think? Bob M. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Myers writes:
MSFS is a computer game. It's a simulation, which is why Microsoft killed it. The market for simulators is very small. The market for games is very large. It is by no stretch of the imagination a "flight simulator" in the sense of something that would actually be useful for flight instruction, except possibly re some very basic procedures training. As I've said, it is widely used as a learning and training aid. No, they don't disagree with me at all. I know what they're using that game for do you? Yes. And just how many pilot certificates have been awarded based on MSFS hours, do you think? None. In every jurisdiction I know of, you have to have hours in a real aircraft to get a pilot certificate, at least currently. That may change in the future, but even then the requirement will be for full-motion simulators, not desktop simulators. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 26, 8:39*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Bob Myers writes: MSFS is a computer game. It's a simulation, which is why Microsoft killed it. The market for simulators is very small. The market for games is very large. WRONG. Guess you can't even speak for Microsoft correctly. http://www.microsoft.com/games/flightsimulatorx/ READ THE URL. It says GAMES. What part of that do you not understand?????????? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot nearly crashes in IMC, Controller helps | pimenthal | Piloting | 32 | September 27th 05 01:06 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: Toronto Plane Pilot Was Allowed To Land In "Red Alert" Weather | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 24 | August 19th 05 10:48 PM |
2 pilot/small airplane CRM | Mitty | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | September 1st 04 11:19 PM |
non-pilot lands airplane | Cub Driver | Piloting | 3 | August 14th 04 12:08 AM |
Home Builders are Sick Sick Puppies | pacplyer | Home Built | 11 | March 26th 04 12:39 AM |