A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

121.5 ELTs banned



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 22nd 10, 05:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default 121.5 ELTs banned

On Jun 22, 3:47*am, Scott wrote:
5Z wrote:
Just saw this in my inbox:


http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news..._202760-1.html


The Federal Communications Commission took the general aviation world
by surprise when it said in a recent report ...... "Were we to
permit continued marketing and use of 121.5 MHz ELTs ... it would
engender the risk that aircraft owners and operators would mistakenly
rely on those ELTs for the relay of distress alerts," the FCC says.
AOPA said today it is opposed to the rule change.


OK, maybe the satellites don't monitor the 121.5 units anymore, but
haven't commercial airliners been required to monitor 121.5 at all
times? *I would think there are enough flight routes in the USA that
almost all areas would be in range of an overflying jetliner to pick up
the signal...


You can Google for past discussions on r.a.s. where 121.5 MHz
monitoring has been discussed ad nauseum. Basically many airlines,
corporate flight departments, military (where equipped) and other
aircraft do guard 121.5 Mhz.

An aircraft monitoring 121.5 MHz may hear an 121.5 Mhz ELT - but if
that ELT is 121.5 MHz only it has no way to work out where the ELT is
located. You then have to launch a SAR operation to try to triangulate
that signal. We need to stop putting that silly workload on SAR
organizations and replace 121.5MHz ELTs with 406 MHz ELTs and PLBs.

Probably worth to keep reminding people that since a 406 MHZ ELT and
406 MHZ PLBs also transmit a 121.5 MHZ homing beacon if you think a
fellow pilot may be in distress you can listen for that sweep tone
sound on 121.5 Mhz. In the USA the PLB will also have a morse code
"P" (dit dah dah dit) added to the signal -- the FCC wanted that
because they thought there would be lots of false PLB activations,
that seems to have turned out not to be the case. At least that will
let you know id somebody has activated an ELT or PLB (the morse code
"P" will let you know for sure it is a PLB). Assuming the pilot is
smart and has a 406 MHZ PLB or ELT then their position has already/is
being worked out by COSPAS-SARSAT and your job is to contact the
county sheriff or similar authorities and let them know a pilot is in
distress and has activated their ELT or PLB.


Darryl
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of 121.5 ELTs to be illegal in U.S. in about 60 days. Jim Logajan Piloting 15 July 3rd 10 09:23 PM
Anybody installing tri-band (406MHz) ELTs? Michelle P Instrument Flight Rules 0 July 4th 05 09:10 PM
Anybody installing tri-band (406MHz) ELTs? Michelle P General Aviation 0 July 4th 05 09:10 PM
406 ELTs: link featuring many models [email protected] Soaring 0 February 20th 05 09:36 PM
Airshows should be banned...Now! Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast Military Aviation 28 June 15th 04 02:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.