![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 22, 3:47*am, Scott wrote:
5Z wrote: Just saw this in my inbox: http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news..._202760-1.html The Federal Communications Commission took the general aviation world by surprise when it said in a recent report ...... "Were we to permit continued marketing and use of 121.5 MHz ELTs ... it would engender the risk that aircraft owners and operators would mistakenly rely on those ELTs for the relay of distress alerts," the FCC says. AOPA said today it is opposed to the rule change. OK, maybe the satellites don't monitor the 121.5 units anymore, but haven't commercial airliners been required to monitor 121.5 at all times? *I would think there are enough flight routes in the USA that almost all areas would be in range of an overflying jetliner to pick up the signal... You can Google for past discussions on r.a.s. where 121.5 MHz monitoring has been discussed ad nauseum. Basically many airlines, corporate flight departments, military (where equipped) and other aircraft do guard 121.5 Mhz. An aircraft monitoring 121.5 MHz may hear an 121.5 Mhz ELT - but if that ELT is 121.5 MHz only it has no way to work out where the ELT is located. You then have to launch a SAR operation to try to triangulate that signal. We need to stop putting that silly workload on SAR organizations and replace 121.5MHz ELTs with 406 MHz ELTs and PLBs. Probably worth to keep reminding people that since a 406 MHZ ELT and 406 MHZ PLBs also transmit a 121.5 MHZ homing beacon if you think a fellow pilot may be in distress you can listen for that sweep tone sound on 121.5 Mhz. In the USA the PLB will also have a morse code "P" (dit dah dah dit) added to the signal -- the FCC wanted that because they thought there would be lots of false PLB activations, that seems to have turned out not to be the case. At least that will let you know id somebody has activated an ELT or PLB (the morse code "P" will let you know for sure it is a PLB). Assuming the pilot is smart and has a 406 MHZ PLB or ELT then their position has already/is being worked out by COSPAS-SARSAT and your job is to contact the county sheriff or similar authorities and let them know a pilot is in distress and has activated their ELT or PLB. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use of 121.5 ELTs to be illegal in U.S. in about 60 days. | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 15 | July 3rd 10 09:23 PM |
Anybody installing tri-band (406MHz) ELTs? | Michelle P | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | July 4th 05 09:10 PM |
Anybody installing tri-band (406MHz) ELTs? | Michelle P | General Aviation | 0 | July 4th 05 09:10 PM |
406 ELTs: link featuring many models | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | February 20th 05 09:36 PM |
Airshows should be banned...Now! | Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast | Military Aviation | 28 | June 15th 04 02:43 AM |