![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
T8 wrote:
On Jun 21, 7:01 pm, brian whatcott wrote: Since satellite cover has been withdrawn for 121.5 (High false alert rate, poor localization) 406.0 and 406.1 ELTs will be needed, following a recent FCC determination. Brian W So does that mean that we'll all have to disable the 121.5 MHz output on our 406(.1) ELTs? Our tax dollars busily at work, again. 121.5 is still used (exclusively, unless there are recent developments I'm unaware of) for DF equipment by CAP. Don't suppose they were consulted. -Evan Ludeman / T8 It appears that the frequency mix is to be 121.5 + 406.~, but not 121.5 + 243. 121.5 df should remain useful. And CAP will get the opportunity to rescue pilots in distress, not chase false alarms. Just ask them about false alerts... Brian W |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use of 121.5 ELTs to be illegal in U.S. in about 60 days. | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 15 | July 3rd 10 09:23 PM |
Anybody installing tri-band (406MHz) ELTs? | Michelle P | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | July 4th 05 09:10 PM |
Anybody installing tri-band (406MHz) ELTs? | Michelle P | General Aviation | 0 | July 4th 05 09:10 PM |
406 ELTs: link featuring many models | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | February 20th 05 09:36 PM |
Airshows should be banned...Now! | Tetherhorne P. Flutterblast | Military Aviation | 28 | June 15th 04 02:43 AM |