Ping Nesbitt

Subject: Ping Nesbitt
From: Tom Mosher

Bertie
Temperature totalizer? Did he actually use that phrase?

I've been working in one state and living in another so I don't get to
peruse the newsgroups very often these days.

Yes he did and once again he is right and every single person who disagrees
with him is a moron despite the fact no one on Earth agrees with him and he
refuses to provide a citation that does. Let's face it, the poor boy is legend
in his own mind.

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything aviation?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote...

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything aviation?

Well...

The other day he said something about CAS being "Computed Airspeed", while most
of us who fly think of CAS as "Calibrated Airspeed"... Even though it is a
lesser-used acronym, mainly limited to the Digital Air Data Computer crowd,
"Computed Airspeed" IS a valid description of the acronym/abbreviation...

Correct? Yes. Useful? Who knows...

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:HdIQb.117057$nt4.481633@attbi_s51...
"B2431" wrote...

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything
aviation?

Dan, do you remember when you were lying about averaging thermocouples by
shorting them together? You would do well to stick to humor.

Well...

The other day he said something about CAS being "Computed Airspeed", while
most
of us who fly think of CAS as "Calibrated Airspeed"... Even though it is
a
lesser-used acronym, mainly limited to the Digital Air Data Computer
crowd,
"Computed Airspeed" IS a valid description of the acronym/abbreviation...

Correct? Yes. Useful? Who knows...

ARINC likes Computed Airspeed and I generally go along with them. That way
I end up with certification paperwork the ACO understands.

Not to say that if some military procurement required me to say, "calibrated
airspeed" that I wouldn't.

From: "Tarver Engineering"

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:HdIQb.117057$nt4.481633@attbi_s51...
"B2431" wrote...

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything
aviation?

Dan, do you remember when you were lying about averaging thermocouples by
shorting them together? You would do well to stick to humor.


Tarver, I never said that. Making things up is not a good way to make yourself
look good.

Let's see if you can find where I said anything even remotely like that. Quote
it for us in its entirety, not with the usual tarver editing.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:HdIQb.117057$nt4.481633@attbi_s51...
"B2431" wrote...

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything
aviation?

Dan, do you remember when you were lying about averaging thermocouples by
shorting them together? You would do well to stick to humor.


Tarver, I never said that. Making things up is not a good way to make
yourself
look good.

It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish trying
to help you.

From: "Tarver Engineering"


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:HdIQb.117057$nt4.481633@attbi_s51...
"B2431" wrote...

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything
aviation?

Dan, do you remember when you were lying about averaging thermocouples by
shorting them together? You would do well to stick to humor.


Tarver, I never said that. Making things up is not a good way to make
yourself
look good.

It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

You failed to quote the part where I asked you for proof I ever said anything
about shorted thermocouples.

Selected omissions and outright lies are so typical of you. This is the reason
everyone in this newsgroup considers you a fraud. It makes me wonder why I
bother treating you with respect.

Dan, U.S.Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

"B2431" wrote in message
...
Subject: Ping Nesbitt
From: Tom Mosher

Bertie
Temperature totalizer? Did he actually use that phrase?

I've been working in one state and living in another so I don't get to
peruse the newsgroups very often these days.

Yes he did

No I didn't.

The only peson insisting that a thermocouple totalizer adds temperate was
Rick.

Besides that, Dan, your bong hit posts about averaging thermocouples had to
be you lying. Noone could be that clueless and be allowed anywhere near
instrumentation.

On 25 Jan 2004 04:58:49 GMT, B2431 wrote:

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything aviation?

The question I have is why anybody continues to engage the idiot?

-Jeff B.
yeff at erols dot com

"Yeff" wrote in message
...
On 25 Jan 2004 04:58:49 GMT, B2431 wrote:

The question I have has he ever really been correct about anything
aviation?

The question I have is why anybody continues to engage the idiot?

That is because it is not me that is the idiot.

The irony is rich.