Ping Nesbitt

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"B2431" wrote in message
...


My theory is he's just insecure. If he sent my employer anything I have
said in
this or other newsgroup they would laugh since I know my stuff.

Dan, you just finnished demopnstrating you are incompetent in the
thermocouple thread. You also bought into the Knoyle archive troll, which
indicates you are incompetent over a wide area of aircraft and aircraft
related systems.

At no time would I want you anywhere near any airplane carrying any
passenger.


I appreciate your mentioning my name once in a while but
you keep forgetting to mention the url.
http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/the_ta...hronicles.html

Jimmy

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

That is because being afiliated with your archive troll is a demonstration
of incompetence.

Here are refutations of the first two sections of the Knoyle "be an idiot
too" archive troll.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Jim Knoyle" wrote:

Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan
says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you
need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static
pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're
saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure'
alone. Or did I misunderstand you?

Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still wants
to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox.


I know...ain't life a bitch John

--

-Gord.

Ralph Nesbitt wrote:

Ok educate me. As previously stated my experience with "Pitot Tubes &
Associated Systems" is due fires on Pitot Covers & associated Red "Remove
Before Flight" streamers, plus IFE's due system problems associated with
Pitot Tubes.

We put those covers on pitot tubes to keep the mud bees out, dippy.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

That is because being afiliated with your archive troll is a demonstration
of incompetence.

Here are refutations of the first two sections of the Knoyle "be an idiot
too" archive troll.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Jim Knoyle" wrote:

Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan
says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you
need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static
pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're
saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure'
alone. Or did I misunderstand you?

Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still
wants
to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox.


I know...ain't life a bitch John

--

-Gord.

Ralph Nesbitt wrote:

Ok educate me. As previously stated my experience with "Pitot Tubes &
Associated Systems" is due fires on Pitot Covers & associated Red
"Remove
Before Flight" streamers, plus IFE's due system problems associated with
Pitot Tubes.

We put those covers on pitot tubes to keep the mud bees out, dippy.


So did I once during a labor dispute.
Square that with your statement: ( direct quote )
"No pitot tube silly bunny.
It would be profoundly stupid to put a home for mud wasps on an airplane
flying as much as a 727."

There you go again, bad-mouthing the Boeing engineers.

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message

Square that with your statement: ( direct quote )
"No pitot tube silly bunny.
It would be profoundly stupid to put a home for mud wasps on an airplane
flying as much as a 727."

The 727 has a pitot port and a static port, idiot Knoyle. You might want to
note that your ignorance of trying to add pitot and static pressures from a
pitot tube demonstrates that you are also incompetent WRT pitot static
systems in general.

You remember, a pitot port is that thing you were mis-describing when Gord
wrote this:

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:


"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
.. .
"Jim Knoyle" wrote:

Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan
says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you
need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static
pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're
saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure'
alone. Or did I misunderstand you?

Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still wants
to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox.


I know...ain't life a bitch John

--

-Gord.