"Cluster bombs called 'war crime'"

Subject: "Cluster bombs called 'war crime'"
From: "cypher745"
Date: 1/24/04 10:04 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

To be honest, I was refering to the Japanese casaulties that would have
numbered in the millions. But your point is well taken.


If the never attacked Pearl Harbor, there would have been no casualities.




Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

ArtKramr wrote:
If the never attacked Pearl Harbor, there would have been no casualities.

If the "advisors" had never been sent to Vietnam there would have been
no casualties. But they did and there were, in both cases. You can't
change history, you can only learn from it. At least smart people learn
from it.

Cheers
David

"David Bromage" wrote in message
.. .
ArtKramr wrote:
If the never attacked Pearl Harbor, there would have been no
casualities.

If the "advisors" had never been sent to Vietnam there would have been
no casualties. But they did and there were, in both cases. You can't
change history, you can only learn from it. At least smart people learn
from it.

Cheers
David


There would have been less. Not "none".