Ping Nesbitt

"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

"Yeff" wrote...

The question I have is why anybody continues to engage the idiot?

Some of us are masochists.

Somebody has to make sure his spew isn't mistaken for truth by the
uninitiated...

"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:_MXQb.20192$U%5.158339@attbi_s03...
"Yeff" wrote...

The question I have is why anybody continues to engage the idiot?

Some of us are masochists.

Somebody has to make sure his spew isn't mistaken for truth by the
uninitiated...

My spew is only taken for truth by the competent.

I remember a couple of years ago when I was having a discussion with
TomKraft and we were laughing at you comical idiots.

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 12:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

OK, now all you have to do is prove me wrong. I would ask you to retract that
accusation as a gentleman would. However, I have seen nothing in you to
indicate you are or ever were a gentleman.

Does it really make you feel better to hurl insults? Are you really that
insecure?

Wait, don't answer, I don't care.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 12:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a
pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

OK, now all you have to do is prove me wrong.

Did and done, what you were writing is stupid.

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 6:07 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 12:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a
pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

OK, now all you have to do is prove me wrong.

Did and done, what you were writing is stupid.

I didn't think you were man enough to apologize and unfortunately I have been
proved right once again.

Grow up, little boy.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 6:07 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 12:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look
foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about
shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually
fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples
to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least
know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a
pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

OK, now all you have to do is prove me wrong.

Did and done, what you were writing is stupid.

I didn't think you were man enough to apologize and unfortunately I have
been
proved right once again.

Perhaps Gord has the patience to explain how aircraft are designed to be
fault tollerent to you.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Blippie" wrote in message
...
RN wrote:
Tarver argued the manual was wrong [...]


With that attitude, I hope he never tries to put up any furniture from
Ikea

MMs are usually wrong,


oh why dont you shut up you ****ing idiot.

look you moron, no one buys your utter crap. you play this consistant
image that the whole aviation world couldnt exist with you.

you have stated in the past the honeywell, boeing etc etc, depend on
your expertise for survival, yet you cannot tell the difference
between a spoiler and flap. you have some bizarre perception of pitot
tubes.

you are a drunk, a liar and full of fcuking ****. NOW SHUT UP.

idiot


but it doesn't generally make any difference. It
doesn't really hurt anything for the MM to call a "total" an "average".

a total is not, nothing like, nor anywhere near an average. its about
the same as calling a spolier a flap.

****ing idiot.

"running with scissors" wrote in
message om...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
"Blippie" wrote in message
...
RN wrote:
Tarver argued the manual was wrong [...]


With that attitude, I hope he never tries to put up any furniture from
Ikea

MMs are usually wrong,


oh why dont you shut up you ****ing idiot.

look you moron, no one buys your utter crap. you play this consistant
image that the whole aviation world couldnt exist with you.

I am sorry that you are nothing and feel sad that I am one of the top
engineers in the aviation industry.

Paul Nixon tried to warn you years ago.

Know that the entire industry laughs at you regularly.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Blippie" wrote in message
...
RN wrote:
Tarver argued the manual was wrong [...]


With that attitude, I hope he never tries to put up any furniture from
Ikea

MMs are usually wrong,

bwahahhahahahhahahhahahhahahhahhahahhahahhaha

but it doesn't generally make any difference.

bwahahahhahhahhahhahhahhahhahhahahhahhahahhahahaha hhahah

It
doesn't really hurt anything for the MM to call a "total" an "average".

bwahahhahahhahahhahahhahahahhahahhahahhahahahhahah hahahahhahahahhahahahhahahah
hahhahahhahahahhahahhahahahhahahahahhahahhahahahah hahahhahahahhahahahahhahahah

yes tarver of course, "total" and "average" dont matter at all. like
"average fuel burn" and "total fuel burn" really dont matter, they can
be interchanged with impunity in a manual and it really doesnt matter.

bwahhahahahhahahhahahhahahahhahahhahahhahahahhahah ahahhahahahhahahaha

****! and you claim to have some degree of knowledge.

"total" and "average" are completely different and in no way
interchangeable and if you make a claim like that and claim to be
around aircraft then you are by and large a ****ing idiot.


for example, John Tarver is a total idiot. His fantastical claims
assure that he is not your average idiot.


****ing moron.