Ping Nesbitt

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 12:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

OK, now all you have to do is prove me wrong. I would ask you to retract that
accusation as a gentleman would. However, I have seen nothing in you to
indicate you are or ever were a gentleman.

Does it really make you feel better to hurl insults? Are you really that
insecure?

Wait, don't answer, I don't care.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 12:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a
pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

OK, now all you have to do is prove me wrong.

Did and done, what you were writing is stupid.

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 6:07 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 12:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a
pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

OK, now all you have to do is prove me wrong.

Did and done, what you were writing is stupid.

I didn't think you were man enough to apologize and unfortunately I have been
proved right once again.

Grow up, little boy.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 6:07 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 1/25/2004 12:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
snip
It made you look foolish, Dan and then Gord made himself look
foolish
trying
to help you.

Well, seeing as you refuse to say where I said anything about
shorted
thermocouples I have to remind you that YOU were the only one who
mentioned
shorted thermocouples when you said that is the way they usually
fail.

I mentioned a dead short as the "major failure mode" of thermocouples
to
demonstate the paradox of your lies, Dan.

I will give you this, unlike the village idiot Knoyle, you at least
know
that you need both pitot and static pressure to make air data from a
pitot
static system, Dan.

But you really ought to stop lying about your "memories".

OK, now all you have to do is prove me wrong.

Did and done, what you were writing is stupid.

I didn't think you were man enough to apologize and unfortunately I have
been
proved right once again.

Perhaps Gord has the patience to explain how aircraft are designed to be
fault tollerent to you.