FAA final rule: Aircraft registrations now good for only 3 years

In rec.aviation.owning Mxsmanic wrote:
Bob writes:

Is this going to stop before everyone gives up our hobby?
Or will flying in the United States be reserved only for the rich and
professionals?

Eventually hobby flight will be squeezed out of existence. Just as nobody is
really driving tractor-trailer rigs for fun, or driving trains for fun,
eventually there will be nobody flying for fun.

Or submarines or earth movers...

Illogical babble.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On 7/23/2010 10:26 AM, wrote:
In rec.aviation.owning wrote:
Bob writes:

Is this going to stop before everyone gives up our hobby?
Or will flying in the United States be reserved only for the rich and
professionals?

Eventually hobby flight will be squeezed out of existence. Just as nobody is
really driving tractor-trailer rigs for fun, or driving trains for fun,
eventually there will be nobody flying for fun.

Or submarines or earth movers...

Illogical babble.


There is a difference between riding/driving/flying a vehicle made for
1,2,3, or 4 and driving a vehicle capable of carrying ten tons.
No doubt about it.
Abolish the cycle, motorbike, motorbike and sidecar, the car,
the row-boat, the bass-boat, the sail-boat?
I don't think so.

But there is something about light aircraft that connects with the
public fear of more hundred ton vehicles demolishing people and places...
Now THAT'S illogical!

Brian W

wrote:
In rec.aviation.owning Mxsmanic wrote:
Bob writes:

Is this going to stop before everyone gives up our hobby?
Or will flying in the United States be reserved only for the rich and
professionals?
Eventually hobby flight will be squeezed out of existence. Just as nobody is
really driving tractor-trailer rigs for fun, or driving trains for fun,
eventually there will be nobody flying for fun.

Or submarines or earth movers...

Illogical babble.



And typical mxsmanic garbage. Besides, some people do operate
tractor-trailers and trains for fun, but let's not confuse the poor kid
with facts.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

writes:

Or submarines or earth movers...

Illogical babble.

Wait and see, particularly if you continue to spend time personally attacking
others when you could spend it lobbying, or voting.

You won't know what you've got until it's gone.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Or submarines or earth movers...

Illogical babble.

Wait and see, particularly if you continue to spend time personally attacking
others when you could spend it lobbying, or voting.

What you call "personally attacking" I call stating the truth.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

On Jul 23, 6:33*pm, wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Or submarines or earth movers...

Illogical babble.

Wait and see, particularly if you continue to spend time personally attacking
others when you could spend it lobbying, or voting.

What you call "personally attacking" I call stating the truth.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Jim, when an adult admits to spending what amounts to man - years
engaged in playing MSFS and posting here, it's reasonable to expect a
distorted world view. He intrudes on a forum that's intended to be for
general discussions among AVIATORS (caps intended). Responding to him
extends these threads in meaningless directions, as is being
demonstrated here.

writes:

What you call "personally attacking" I call stating the truth.

Whatever you choose to call it, it isn't helping the cause of general and
private aviation.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

What you call "personally attacking" I call stating the truth.

Whatever you choose to call it, it isn't helping the cause of general and
private aviation.

Like any of your inane postings have anything at all to do with real
aviation, much less helping aviation in any way, shape or form.

Please tell us again that people can't run trains for fun when in fact
they do and can think of two places fairly locally to me where it happens,
and how that somehow is relevant to aviation.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.