![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/14/2010 8:17 AM, Derek C wrote:
On Aug 14, 11:30 am, John wrote: Derek C wrote: The consequence of using a 10% weaker link would be a greater chance of a broken weak link and a failed launch, which might be hazardous in itself under some circumstances. No, never! A cable break is routine and *never* hazardous in *any* circumstances. If it is, then something in your operation is seriously flawed. Depends on the size and nature of the airfield. Our site at Lasham in the UK is large and flat, and gives you a wide range of options after a winch launch failure. I have flown at a small sloping German site where they launched without a weak link because having a weak link failure was considered a serious hazard. Having said that the speed control and quality of their winch launches was very good. Derek C Out of genuine curiosity, can you share more details of "small sloping...site"? I have difficulty imagining a winch site unsuitable for either a straight ahead landing following an 'early-early' launch problem not also suitable for a 360-to-a-return-at-the-launch-point for a 'later-in-time' launch problem. I am assuming a 'reasonably powered winch' of course, which I imagine is the German norm. Short of an anemic winch with the winch/line stashed down a road in a copse of woods, my imagination fails me here. My experience in the western U.S. (generally 5000' msl) is any field considered 'distance-suitable' for (even marginal) aerotowing is - in a launch-emergency sense - far more 'emergency-option-friendly' than aerotowing, because you never get dragged at low altitude over completely unlandable terrain...which is definitely *not* the case in these parts with aerotowing. Are there folks winch launching from postage-stamp-sized-fields surrounded by unlandable terrain using a beyond-the-boundary-winch? Curiously, Bob W. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 15, 2:23*pm, Bob Whelan wrote:
Are there folks winch launching from postage-stamp-sized-fields surrounded by unlandable terrain using a beyond-the-boundary-winch? The site where I converted to winch launching was like that. It's "Jury Hill", at Greytown, near Wellington NZ. There is a quite long north/south runway, but the interesting conditions are often in westerly winds. The westerly runway starts from the southern end of the main runway and at the time I was flying there had a length of around 300 - 400 m. The winch run was something like 1200 m with the remainder of the distance to the winch crossing a mixture of swamp and low "sand dunes" (not actually sand, but similarly lumpy). The cable retrieve vehicle used a not terribly straight path through the lumps, including crossing a farm track and one or two small streams. With a glider with good brakes (e.g. Ka7, ASK13) and a bit of a headwind (and you wouldn't use that runway unless there was too much crosswind for the other one) you could land straight ahead from a cable break at 200 or 250 ft and make some kind of circuit from 200 ft or less, so there was always either one good option or else two reasonable ones for the same runway, plus the option of simply turning right 90 degrees onto the 1000+ m runway and land with a crosswind. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
physics question about pull ups | John Rivers | Soaring | 59 | June 10th 10 12:21 PM |
FS: Wings&Wheels Wing Stand | James Hamilton[_2_] | Soaring | 0 | September 12th 09 01:15 AM |
Pull up a chair and hear me out: | Vaughn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 2nd 06 02:04 AM |
Better GPS, Flight Computer, Variable Wing Geometry, abililty to Self-Launch | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 7 | May 2nd 05 06:02 PM |
Glider pull-up and ballast | M B | Soaring | 0 | September 15th 03 06:29 PM |