A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

General Patton on Lieutenant Kerry



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 31st 04, 02:21 AM
cypher745
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ancestry of George S. Patton

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Henry III Plantagenet
[King of England]
1216-1272
|
+---------------------------------+
| |
Edward I Plantagenet Edmund
Plantagenet
[King of England] [Earl of
Lancaster]
1239-1307
1244/5-1296
| |
+-----------------------+ |
| | |
Edward II Plantagenet Elizabeth Plantagenet Henry
Plantagenet
[King of England] [Princess] [Earl of
Lancaster]
1284-1327 1282-1316
c1281-1345
| | |
Edward III Plantagenet | |
[King of England] | |
1312-1377 | |
| | |
+--------------------+ | |
| | | |
John of Gaunt Thomas Plantagenet Sir William de Bohun Alianor of
Lancsster
[Duke of Lancaster] [Earl of Gloucester] c1312-1360
1311/2-1372
1340-1399 1354/5-1397 | |
| | | |
Joan Beaufort Anne Plantagenet Elizabeth de Bohun--=--Richard
Fitzalan
c1379-1440 1383-1438 c1350-1385 |
1346-1397
| | |
George Nevill Sir John Bourchier Elizabeth Fitzalan
-1469 c1406-1474 c1366-1425
| | |
Henry Nevill----=---Joana Bourchier Joan Gousill
-1469 | c1442-1470 c1409-1459
| |
| +----------------------+
| | |
Richard Nevill, K.B. Katherine Stanley Sir John
Stanley
c1468-1530 1430-1498
c1439-c1485
| | |
Dorothy Nevill Christopher Savage---=---Anne
Stanley
1496-1532 -1513 | -
| |
Anne Dawney Christopher Savage
- -1546
| |
John Conyers Francis Savage
- -
| |
Eleanor Conyers Anthony Savage
1564-1611 -
| |
William Strother Anthony Savage
1597-1669 1605-1695
| |
William Strother---------------=--------------Dorothy Savage
1630-1702 | c1636-1716
|
Jeremiah Strother
c1655-1741
|
James Strother
c1707-1761
|
French Strother
1733-1799
|
Margaret French Strother
1758-1835
|
Lucy Slaughter
c1784-
|
Peggy French Williams
1804-1873
|
George Smith Patton
1833-1869
|
George Smith Patton, Jr.
1856-1927
|
George Smith Patton III
[U.S. Army General]
-1945

Brooks, please note the the use of III.

Have a good day.




  #2  
Old January 31st 04, 02:49 AM
S. Sampson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"cypher745" wrote
Ancestry of George S. Patton

George Smith Patton III
[U.S. Army General]
-1945

Brooks, please note the the use of III.

Have a good day.


Your source is in error. The WWI and WWII hero was "Jr."
His father changed his middle name from William to Smith, and
therefore was not a "Jr."


  #3  
Old January 31st 04, 11:11 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Your source is in error. The WWI and WWII hero was "Jr."
His father changed his middle name from William to Smith, and
therefore was not a "Jr."


The Biographical Dictionary of World War II confirms that the famous
(infamous, if you prefer) general was George Smith Patton, Junior.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #4  
Old January 31st 04, 02:56 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"cypher745" wrote in message
. com...
Ancestry of George S. Patton


snip incorrect garbage

Brooks, please note the the use of III.

Have a good day.


Check your sources, pal. Your batting average today ain't too hot, is it?

Brooks






  #5  
Old January 31st 04, 03:13 AM
cypher745
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brooks,

Here is a link to my original source:

http://members.aol.com/dwidad/pattonped.html

And another one from the Patton society

http://www.pattonhq.com/pattontree.html

They both show the General patton of WWII fame as being the III.




h
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...

"cypher745" wrote in message
. com...
Ancestry of George S. Patton


snip incorrect garbage

Brooks, please note the the use of III.

Have a good day.


Check your sources, pal. Your batting average today ain't too hot, is it?

Brooks








  #6  
Old January 31st 04, 04:53 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"cypher745" wrote in message
. com...
Brooks,

Here is a link to my original source:

http://members.aol.com/dwidad/pattonped.html

And another one from the Patton society

http://www.pattonhq.com/pattontree.html

They both show the General patton of WWII fame as being the III.


They are wrong. Again, check your sources. Just because some yahoo has
incorrect information and posts it on a webpage does not make it right.
"Brassey's Encyclopedia of Military History and Biography", pp. 762-765 has
the correct idenitification as "Jr". The freaking US Army lists him as "Jr"
(www.knox.army.mil/center/g3/museum/gspatton.htm ). Then there is:

Ayer, Frederick. BEFORE THE COLORS FADE. PORTRAIT OF A SOLDIER: GENERAL
GEORGE S. PATTON, JR. With a foreword by Omar N. Bradley. Boston:
Houghton-Mifflin, 1964. 266 p. 940.54092 Aye.

Unless you think Omar Bradley did not know who he was? You, and your
sources, are wrong...get it?

Brooks



  #7  
Old January 31st 04, 05:50 AM
cypher745
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brooks,


I think that we are both right.
He may have gone by Jr, but have been the third George Patton, or have gone
by Jr, and really have been the II.

If you look at the family tree from the Patton Society, you will notice that
his father's birth name was George William Patton. He later changed it to
George Smith Patton. The key Question here is when did he change his name?
If he changed it before the birth of our WWII hero, then his name is George
S Patton III. If he changed it afterwards, then his name is George S Patton
II with his grandfather being the first.

Technically this means, that the only way he could be a Jr. was if he was
indeed the III. Since, if his father's middle name was William at the time
of his birth he would not really be a Jr. You need to look no further than
our President and his dad to see that this is indeed the case.


Main Entry: 2junior
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, n. & adjective
1 a (1) : a person who is younger than another a man six years my junior
(2) : a male child : SON


As such the term Jr. would not apply between a grandfather and a grandson.








If you look at the source
"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...

"cypher745" wrote in message
. com...
Brooks,

Here is a link to my original source:

http://members.aol.com/dwidad/pattonped.html

And another one from the Patton society

http://www.pattonhq.com/pattontree.html

They both show the General patton of WWII fame as being the III.


They are wrong. Again, check your sources. Just because some yahoo has
incorrect information and posts it on a webpage does not make it right.
"Brassey's Encyclopedia of Military History and Biography", pp. 762-765

has
the correct idenitification as "Jr". The freaking US Army lists him as

"Jr"
(www.knox.army.mil/center/g3/museum/gspatton.htm ). Then there is:

Ayer, Frederick. BEFORE THE COLORS FADE. PORTRAIT OF A SOLDIER: GENERAL
GEORGE S. PATTON, JR. With a foreword by Omar N. Bradley. Boston:
Houghton-Mifflin, 1964. 266 p. 940.54092 Aye.

Unless you think Omar Bradley did not know who he was? You, and your
sources, are wrong...get it?

Brooks





  #8  
Old January 31st 04, 06:07 AM
John Keeney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"cypher745" wrote in message
. com...

Main Entry: 2junior
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, n. & adjective
1 a (1) : a person who is younger than another a man six years my junior
(2) : a male child : SON


As such the term Jr. would not apply between a grandfather and a grandson.


Sure it could, common usage.


  #9  
Old January 31st 04, 11:13 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


He may have gone by Jr, but have been the third George Patton, or have gone
by Jr, and really have been the II.


Naming doesn't happen that way. To be a Junior or II or III requires
that all your names be identical. That's why the 43rd president is not
George Bush Junior, though his father is also George Bush. The stuff
in between is different.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #10  
Old January 31st 04, 03:51 AM
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"cypher745" wrote:
|
George Smith Patton, Jr.
1856-1927
|
George Smith Patton III
[U.S. Army General]
-1945

Brooks, please note the the use of III.


Your elaborate family tree appears to need some editing:

From the beginning of http://www.generalpatton.com/biography.html

"BIOGRAPHY OF GENERAL GEORGE S. PATTON, JR.
One of the most complicated military men of all time, General George
Smith Patton, Jr. was born November 11, 1885 in San Gabriel, California."

Have a good day.


Heh.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Chris Thomas a Real Pilot? jls Home Built 147 September 14th 04 03:03 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Home Built 3 May 14th 04 11:55 AM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aviation Marketplace 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.