Why We Lost The Vietnam War

"Brett" wrote in message
...
"Spiv" wrote:
"Brett" wrote in message
...
"Spiv" wrote:

...

I advise you to look into the Brabazon
project instead of babbling balls. It was

the forerunner of "every" modern
airliner

Strange most "modern airliners" look like they are direct descendants
of
the
Dash 80, two to four podded engines located on the wing.

Read what I wrote about the Brabazon 1

Why should I bother to read your account elsewhere - your previous ravings
in this thread and a couple of others already indicate you don't know
anything about the subject.

I repaet "Read what I wrote about the Brabazon 1"

** snip babble **

"Spiv" wrote:
"Brett" wrote in message
...
"Spiv" wrote:
"Brett" wrote in message
...
"Spiv" wrote:

...

I advise you to look into the Brabazon
project instead of babbling balls. It was

the forerunner of "every" modern
airliner

Strange most "modern airliners" look like they are direct
descendants
of
the
Dash 80, two to four podded engines located on the wing.

Read what I wrote about the Brabazon 1

Why should I bother to read your account elsewhere - your previous
ravings
in this thread and a couple of others already indicate you don't know
anything about the subject.

I repaet "Read what I wrote about the Brabazon 1"

As I said "head, of mush" your ravings on the subject indicate that you know
absolutely nothing worth listening to about the Bristol Brabazon or the
conclusions of the Brabazon Committee (I will give you one clue, I have been
a passenger in aircraft that resulted from the Brabazon Committee Type IIB,
Type IV, Type VB specification and something that could have been built to
satisfy the Type III specification).

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

I repaet "Read what I wrote about the Brabazon 1"


What you wrote about the Brabazon is incorrect.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

I repaet "Read what I wrote about the Brabazon 1"

What you wrote about the Brabazon is incorrect.

Prove please.

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

Prove please.


I already have, review the thread.

Why don't you respond when challenged to provide proof of your claims?

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

Prove please.


I already have, review the thread.

Why don't you respond when challenged to provide proof of your claims?

Well, why don't you respond when challenged to provide proof of your claims?

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

Well, why don't you respond when challenged to provide proof of your
claims?


I have responded to all of your challenges, I just see no need to repeat
myself. You, on the other hand, have provided nothing to support your
assertions when challenged.

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Spiv" wrote in message
...

Well, why don't you respond when challenged to provide proof of your
claims?


I have responded to all of your challenges, I just see no need to repeat
myself. You, on the other hand, have provided nothing to support your
assertions when challenged.

Please all the threads again - twice.