A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 25th 10, 12:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:52Â*pm, Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:21Â*pm, wrote:

Mark wrote:
Huh? Â*Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. Â*Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. Â*I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?


--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.

---
Mark


They're also having trouble keeping up with demand.

My last count was in excess of 1500 already sold,


And that is world wide.

So far this year, the worlds car makers have put out roughly 38,000,000 cars.

Tesla has managed to capture .004% of the market.

Oh yeah, the crowds are forming to buy these things.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #2  
Old September 25th 10, 12:35 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 24, 7:16*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:52*pm, Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:21*pm, wrote:


Mark wrote:
Huh? *Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. *Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. *I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?


--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.


---
Mark


They're also having trouble keeping up with demand.


My last count was in excess of 1500 already sold,


And that is world wide.

So far this year, the worlds car makers have put out roughly 38,000,000 cars.

Tesla has managed to capture .004% of the market.

Oh yeah, the crowds are forming to buy these things.

--
Jim Pennino


Let's pretend for a second. I've invented a new HVAC
system for the residental market. It is 2X as efficient
as anything Carrier or anyone else has. But, I've
just started production. You can get one next spring
through you building contractor. It will save people
50% on their heating and cooling. If asked, NO one
says they don't want one.

What will my sales figures look like today?

What about people who want one, but have
no store to purchase it yet.

What about people, like you, just finding out?

What about people who want one, but cannot
afford to rip out their old HVAC system?

Apples to apples.

Your position on e cars is overlooking several key
factors, which invalidates your opinion.

---
Mark

  #3  
Old September 25th 10, 01:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 7:16Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:52Â*pm, Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:21Â*pm, wrote:


Mark wrote:
Huh? Â*Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. Â*Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. Â*I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?


--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.


---
Mark


They're also having trouble keeping up with demand.


My last count was in excess of 1500 already sold,


And that is world wide.

So far this year, the worlds car makers have put out roughly 38,000,000 cars.

Tesla has managed to capture .004% of the market.

Oh yeah, the crowds are forming to buy these things.

--
Jim Pennino


Let's pretend for a second. I've invented a new HVAC
system for the residental market. It is 2X as efficient
as anything Carrier or anyone else has. But, I've
just started production. You can get one next spring
through you building contractor. It will save people
50% on their heating and cooling. If asked, NO one
says they don't want one.


A big unstated factor is the installed price.

Assuming it is cost competive, then people will fall into groups:

Non-buyers:

People that don't want the big capital outlay as long as the current system
is working, i.e. the majority of people.

Buyers:

People who need the existing system replaced, i.e. some small fraction.

People with "needs" that require the system run 24/7, have huge utility
bills, and have the capital to replace the system, i.e. some small fraction.

Wealth enviro-whinners that will buy and pay for anything with a "green"
lable on it, i.e. some small fraction.

If it is not cost competitive, buyer group 1 gets even smaller and
buy something else while group 2 will do an economic analysis of capital
cost versus saved utilities cost.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #4  
Old September 25th 10, 03:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 24, 8:17*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 7:16*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:52*pm, Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:21*pm, wrote:


Mark wrote:
Huh? *Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. *Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. *I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?


--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.


---
Mark


They're also having trouble keeping up with demand.


My last count was in excess of 1500 already sold,


And that is world wide.


So far this year, the worlds car makers have put out roughly 38,000,000 cars.


Tesla has managed to capture .004% of the market.


Oh yeah, the crowds are forming to buy these things.


--
Jim Pennino


Let's pretend for a second. I've invented a new HVAC
system for the residental market. It is 2X as efficient
as anything Carrier or anyone else has. *But, I've
just started production. You can get one next spring
through you building contractor. It will save people
50% on their heating and cooling. If asked, NO one
says they don't want one.


A big unstated factor is the installed price.


Good point. The examination of hvac systems to e cars
has an additional unparallel comparison, installation. That
is a one time fee. With e cars, their R & D might be the
unstated factor which the company must recoupe. So,
initally, the prices would be higher for them to make a
profit. Over time...the prices will fall as their R & D
investment is returned.

Assuming it is cost competive, then people will fall into groups:

Non-buyers:

People that don't want the big capital outlay as long as the current system
is working, i.e. the majority of people.


Maybe. But how do the majority of people (in America) fund their
big capital outlays? They finance, and make monthly payments.
What is an electric bill? A monthly payment. Cut your electric
bill in half and now you can afford your new HVAC system. After
4 months you've paid off the installation portion of your investment.
Later you've paid off the entire new system, and freed up monthly
cash.

Buyers:

People who need the existing system replaced, i.e. some small fraction.


But, *everyone* needs this new HVAC system. It's warmer, it's
cooler, it's quieter, it takes up less room, and it has a lifetime
warranty.

People with "needs" that require the system run 24/7, have huge utility
bills, and have the capital to replace the system, i.e. some small fraction.


Ok, this group needs it even worse, and can act immediately.

Wealth enviro-whinners that will buy and pay for anything with a "green"
lable on it, i.e. some small fraction.


Agreed.

If it is not cost competitive, buyer group 1 gets even smaller


But...it cuts your electric/gas bill down from 450/month to
225/month.

and
buy something else while group 2 will do an economic analysis of capital
cost versus saved utilities cost.


Well, in all actuality, what would really occur is that your
building contractor would steer you into the new system, and
infomercials would saturate the media to convince the large
majority of people who make impulse purchases.

thinking

So...you're really a good guy, aren't you? And...you feel an
allegiance to this group and feel like you're pretty good at
running off interloping phonies. If so, that's commendable.
Or, you're a good guy with a gruff personality, kinda loose
with details, but everyone accepts that, because you're a
good guy. You may act like an asshole to me, but I see
through that. That is why I feel so bad about calling you a
pinhead in a post title. Just bear in mind that I'm an
aggressive competetor, not a troll, and no one pushes me
around. If other pilots will post piloting questions and
stories, then I can go back to just lurking.

g Or I might get back on my bicycle at the airport
and ride around with my magic headphones that
pick up alien spacecraft.

---
Mark

--
Jim Pennino



  #5  
Old September 25th 10, 06:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 8:17Â*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:


Let's pretend for a second. I've invented a new HVAC
system for the residental market. It is 2X as efficient
as anything Carrier or anyone else has. Â*But, I've
just started production. You can get one next spring
through you building contractor. It will save people
50% on their heating and cooling. If asked, NO one
says they don't want one.


A big unstated factor is the installed price.


Good point. The examination of hvac systems to e cars
has an additional unparallel comparison, installation. That
is a one time fee. With e cars, their R & D might be the


Babble.

Any new product has R&D costs.

Non-buyers:

People that don't want the big capital outlay as long as the current system
is working, i.e. the majority of people.


Maybe. But how do the majority of people (in America) fund their
big capital outlays? They finance, and make monthly payments.
What is an electric bill? A monthly payment. Cut your electric
bill in half and now you can afford your new HVAC system.


Babble.

Half my average electric bill is about $45, hardly enough to cover the
payment on a new HVAC system.

4 months you've paid off the installation portion of your investment.


Babble.

The installation cost is rolled into the total cost.

People who need the existing system replaced, i.e. some small fraction.


But, *everyone* needs this new HVAC system. It's warmer, it's
cooler, it's quieter, it takes up less room, and it has a lifetime
warranty.


Babble.

The temperature is set by the thermostate, all modern HVAC systems are quiet,
and nobody cares how much room it takes on the roof or the patio.

People with "needs" that require the system run 24/7, have huge utility
bills, and have the capital to replace the system, i.e. some small fraction.


But...it cuts your electric/gas bill down from 450/month to
225/month.


If you have a $450/monthe electric bill, you either live in a mansion or
you are doing something really stupid.

buy something else while group 2 will do an economic analysis of capital
cost versus saved utilities cost.


Well, in all actuality, what would really occur is that your
building contractor would steer you into the new system, and
infomercials would saturate the media to convince the large
majority of people who make impulse purchases.


Babble.

People make impulse purchases of bags of potatoe chips and cookies, not
major appliances.

So...you're really a good guy, aren't you? And...you feel an
allegiance to this group and feel like you're pretty good at
running off interloping phonies. If so, that's commendable.
Or, you're a good guy with a gruff personality, kinda loose
with details, but everyone accepts that, because you're a
good guy. You may act like an asshole to me, but I see
through that. That is why I feel so bad about calling you a
pinhead in a post title. Just bear in mind that I'm an
aggressive competetor, not a troll, and no one pushes me
around. If other pilots will post piloting questions and
stories, then I can go back to just lurking.


Babble.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #6  
Old September 25th 10, 07:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
joeturn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 25, 10:00*am, Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 8:17*pm, wrote:





Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 7:16*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:52*pm, Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:21*pm, wrote:


Mark wrote:
Huh? *Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. *Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. *I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?


--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.


---
Mark


They're also having trouble keeping up with demand.


My last count was in excess of 1500 already sold,


And that is world wide.


So far this year, the worlds car makers have put out roughly 38,000,000 cars.


Tesla has managed to capture .004% of the market.


Oh yeah, the crowds are forming to buy these things.


--
Jim Pennino


Let's pretend for a second. I've invented a new HVAC
system for the residental market. It is 2X as efficient
as anything Carrier or anyone else has. *But, I've
just started production. You can get one next spring
through you building contractor. It will save people
50% on their heating and cooling. If asked, NO one
says they don't want one.


A big unstated factor is the installed price.


Good point. The examination of hvac systems to e cars
has an additional unparallel comparison, installation. That
is a one time fee. With e cars, their R & D might be the
unstated factor which the company must recoupe. So,
initally, the prices would be higher for them to make a
profit. Over time...the prices will fall as their R & D
investment is returned.

Assuming it is cost competive, then people will fall into groups:


Non-buyers:


People that don't want the big capital outlay as long as the current system
is working, i.e. the majority of people.


Maybe. But how do the majority of people (in America) fund their
big capital outlays? *They finance, and make monthly payments.
What is an electric bill? A monthly payment. Cut your electric
bill in half and now you can afford your new HVAC system. After
4 months you've paid off the installation portion of your investment.
Later you've paid off the entire new system, and freed up monthly
cash.

Buyers:


People who need the existing system replaced, i.e. some small fraction.


But, *everyone* needs this new HVAC system. It's warmer, it's
cooler, it's quieter, it takes up less room, and it has a lifetime
warranty.

People with "needs" that require the system run 24/7, have huge utility
bills, and have the capital to replace the system, i.e. some small fraction.


Ok, this group needs it even worse, and can act immediately.

Wealth enviro-whinners that will buy and pay for anything with a "green"
lable on it, i.e. some small fraction.


Agreed.

If it is not cost competitive, buyer group 1 gets even smaller


But...it cuts your electric/gas bill down from 450/month to
225/month.

and
buy something else while group 2 will do an economic analysis of capital
cost versus saved utilities cost.


Well, in all actuality, what would really occur is that your
building contractor would steer you into the new system, and
infomercials would saturate the media to convince the large
majority of people who make impulse purchases.

thinking

So...you're really a good guy, aren't you? *And...you feel an
allegiance to this group and feel like you're pretty good at
running off interloping phonies. If so, that's commendable.
Or, you're a good guy with a gruff personality, kinda loose
with details, but everyone accepts that, because you're a
good guy. You may act like an asshole to me, but I see
through that. That is why I feel so bad about calling you a
pinhead in a post title. Just bear in mind that I'm an
aggressive competetor, not a troll, and no one pushes me
around. If other pilots will post piloting questions and
stories, then I can go back to just lurking.

g Or I might get back on my bicycle at the airport
* * * *and ride around with my magic headphones that
* * * *pick up alien spacecraft.

---
Mark



--
Jim Pennino- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


As I was stalking the spamologist Edward,I was intriged with your
thread.The Tesla car could be made to be limitless,if it contained one
of these to charge the battery while in motion!''However the
illuminati has too much to loose to allow production of a replacement
for the internal combustion engine!

The power companies would go out of buisiness and Obama would have to
tear down all those power lines and do away with nuclear facilties as
thats their intended purpose to furnish electricity instead of
building nuclear weapons!

So free energy devices are too much of a threat to big buisiness $$$$$$
$$$$$$

http://www.magniwork.com/?hop=promo15391

  #7  
Old September 25th 10, 10:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 25, 2:54*pm, joeturn wrote:
On Sep 25, 10:00*am, Mark wrote:





On Sep 24, 8:17*pm, wrote:


Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 7:16*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:52*pm, Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:21*pm, wrote:


Mark wrote:
Huh? *Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. *Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. *I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?


--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.


---
Mark


They're also having trouble keeping up with demand.


My last count was in excess of 1500 already sold,


And that is world wide.


So far this year, the worlds car makers have put out roughly 38,000,000 cars.


Tesla has managed to capture .004% of the market.


Oh yeah, the crowds are forming to buy these things.


--
Jim Pennino


Let's pretend for a second. I've invented a new HVAC
system for the residental market. It is 2X as efficient
as anything Carrier or anyone else has. *But, I've
just started production. You can get one next spring
through you building contractor. It will save people
50% on their heating and cooling. If asked, NO one
says they don't want one.


A big unstated factor is the installed price.


Good point. The examination of hvac systems to e cars
has an additional unparallel comparison, installation. That
is a one time fee. With e cars, their R & D might be the
unstated factor which the company must recoupe. So,
initally, the prices would be higher for them to make a
profit. Over time...the prices will fall as their R & D
investment is returned.


Assuming it is cost competive, then people will fall into groups:


Non-buyers:


People that don't want the big capital outlay as long as the current system
is working, i.e. the majority of people.


Maybe. But how do the majority of people (in America) fund their
big capital outlays? *They finance, and make monthly payments.
What is an electric bill? A monthly payment. Cut your electric
bill in half and now you can afford your new HVAC system. After
4 months you've paid off the installation portion of your investment.
Later you've paid off the entire new system, and freed up monthly
cash.


Buyers:


People who need the existing system replaced, i.e. some small fraction.

  #8  
Old September 28th 10, 02:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
joeturn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16
Default Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion

On Sep 25, 5:32*pm, Mark wrote:
On Sep 25, 2:54*pm, joeturn wrote:





On Sep 25, 10:00*am, Mark wrote:


On Sep 24, 8:17*pm, wrote:


Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 7:16*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:52*pm, Mark wrote:
On Sep 24, 6:21*pm, wrote:


Mark wrote:
Huh? *Now Mr.Logajan has also posted the same
info in this thread. *Now 2 of us have mentioned this
300 mile/charge electric car. *I don't understand.


You don't understand that the Tesla doesn't claim 300 mile/charge?


--
Jim Pennino


Tesla claims beyond 300 miles on one charge.


---
Mark


They're also having trouble keeping up with demand.


My last count was in excess of 1500 already sold,


And that is world wide.


So far this year, the worlds car makers have put out roughly 38,000,000 cars.


Tesla has managed to capture .004% of the market.


Oh yeah, the crowds are forming to buy these things.


--
Jim Pennino


Let's pretend for a second. I've invented a new HVAC
system for the residental market. It is 2X as efficient
as anything Carrier or anyone else has. *But, I've
just started production. You can get one next spring
through you building contractor. It will save people
50% on their heating and cooling. If asked, NO one
says they don't want one.


A big unstated factor is the installed price.


Good point. The examination of hvac systems to e cars
has an additional unparallel comparison, installation. That
is a one time fee. With e cars, their R & D might be the
unstated factor which the company must recoupe. So,
initally, the prices would be higher for them to make a
profit. Over time...the prices will fall as their R & D
investment is returned.


Assuming it is cost competive, then people will fall into groups:


Non-buyers:


People that don't want the big capital outlay as long as the current system
is working, i.e. the majority of people.


Maybe. But how do the majority of people (in America) fund their
big capital outlays? *They finance, and make monthly payments.
What is an electric bill? A monthly payment. Cut your electric
bill in half and now you can afford your new HVAC system. After
4 months you've paid off the installation portion of your investment.
Later you've paid off the entire new system, and freed up monthly
cash.


Buyers:


People who need the existing system replaced, i.e. some small fraction.


But, *everyone* needs this new HVAC system. It's warmer, it's
cooler, it's quieter, it takes up less room, and it has a lifetime
warranty.


People with "needs" that require the system run 24/7, have huge utility
bills, and have the capital to replace the system, i.e. some small fraction.


Ok, this group needs it even worse, and can act immediately.


Wealth enviro-whinners that will buy and pay for anything with a "green"
lable on it, i.e. some small fraction.


Agreed.


If it is not cost competitive, buyer group 1 gets even smaller


But...it cuts your electric/gas bill down from 450/month to
225/month.


and
buy something else while group 2 will do an economic analysis of capital
cost versus saved utilities cost.


Well, in all actuality, what would really occur is that your
building contractor would steer you into the new system, and
infomercials would saturate the media to convince the large
majority of people who make impulse purchases.


thinking


So...you're really a good guy, aren't you? *And...you feel an
allegiance to this group and feel like you're pretty good at
running off interloping phonies. If so, that's commendable.
Or, you're a good guy with a gruff personality, kinda loose
with details, but everyone accepts that, because you're a
good guy. You may act like an asshole to me, but I see
through that. That is why I feel so bad about calling you a
pinhead in a post title. Just bear in mind that I'm an
aggressive competetor, not a troll, and no one pushes me
around. If other pilots will post piloting questions and
stories, then I can go back to just lurking.


g Or I might get back on my bicycle at the airport
* * * *and ride around with my magic headphones that
* * * *pick up alien spacecraft.


---
Mark


--
Jim Pennino- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


As I was stalking the spamologist Edward,I was intriged with your
thread.The Tesla car could be made to be limitless,if it contained one
of these to charge the battery while in motion!''However the
illuminati has too much to loose to allow production of a replacement
for the internal combustion engine!


The power companies would go out of buisiness and Obama would have to
tear down all those power lines and do away with nuclear facilties as
thats their intended purpose to furnish electricity instead of
building nuclear weapons!


So free energy devices are too much of a threat to big buisiness $$$$$$
$$$$$$


http://www.magniwork.com/?hop=promo15391-Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


That machine is an illusion. You cannot violate the law of
thermodynamics. Perpetual motion is impossible.

http://burtleburtle.net/bob/physics/whythere.html

---
Mark- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Ahh, you've disappointed me Mark!

I was sure you would pick up on the fact that free energy was directly
censored out of the equation by big buisiness!

Remember Kaku said physics was off by a factor of 20 after being
proven wrong!

Now you have swallowed the idea that a perpetual motion machine is
imposible!?!?

Now do some digging ole Albert says Energy is equal to mass times the
time constant squared!

This means anything that has motion produces energy!

The electro-magnetic reaction will produce endless motion as a motor.
In reverse tecnology produces power(the generator/alternator).

Now to replace the electro magnets within an alternator/motor with
permanet magnets will cause passing the coil through the magnetic
field will produce Electricity without any power.

Trust me here it is being done! The illusion is censored
tecnology(free energy)I;-)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electric locomotion will replace internal combustion Mark Piloting 81 September 22nd 10 05:40 PM
IFR GPS replace DME / ADF? [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 21 May 15th 06 03:13 PM
H2 Combustion-Booster Claimed [email protected] Home Built 44 October 12th 05 04:14 AM
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? Guy Alcala Military Aviation 265 March 7th 04 09:28 AM
high-speed camera view of a piston intake, combustion, exhaust R.Hubbell General Aviation 0 February 20th 04 03:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.