![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
And note I am free and see not reasons to behave better than anyone else does. Hmmmm... interesting that you should bring up 'freedom', considering that yes you are *now* free to post whatever thoughts you may have to the internet, which, under the old Soviet system you would never have even known existed. Such irony. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote in message . ..
snip And note I am free and see not reasons to behave better than anyone else does. Hmmmm... interesting that you should bring up 'freedom', considering that yes you are *now* free to post whatever thoughts you may have to the internet, which, under the old Soviet system you would never have even known existed. Such irony. Disagree. If USSR would exist now Internet would be very well known and in use. There would be certainly some restrictions like those recently reported in China for instance which certainly cannot significantly stop free spread of information. Like a telephone for instance it is simply too important invention in order anyone can ignore or ban it. BTW telephone was pretty well known in USSR as well as all other telecommunication technologies known in the world. However there is irony indeed that internet (US invention) kills US propaganda media by free disrtibution of true info and true foreign public opinions on US politics in US itself. Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message
| | Disagree. If USSR would exist now Internet would be very well | known and in use. There would be certainly some restrictions | like those recently reported in China for instance which certainly | cannot significantly stop free spread of information. Like | a telephone for instance it is simply too important invention in order | anyone can ignore or ban it. BTW telephone was pretty well known | in USSR as well as all other telecommunication technologies | known in the world. However there is irony indeed that internet (US invention) | kills US propaganda media by free disrtibution of true info and true | foreign public opinions on US politics in US itself. | | Michael I understand that television was different in the old USSR as well. While we in the west would watch the television for entertainment - in the USSR, the TV watches you. -- Cheers Dave Kearton |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Kearton" wrote in message ... "Michael Petukhov" wrote in message | | Disagree. If USSR would exist now Internet would be very well | known and in use. There would be certainly some restrictions | like those recently reported in China for instance which certainly | cannot significantly stop free spread of information. Like | a telephone for instance it is simply too important invention in order | anyone can ignore or ban it. BTW telephone was pretty well known | in USSR as well as all other telecommunication technologies | known in the world. However there is irony indeed that internet (US invention) | kills US propaganda media by free disrtibution of true info and true | foreign public opinions on US politics in US itself. | | Michael Whats really funny is that Micheal has neglected to mention how paranoid the Soviet authorities were about technology. Photocopiers and duplicating machines were rigidly controlled and licensed lest people use them for publishing counter revolutionary documents and the Fax machines had them in a real tizzy since with the technology available the authorities had a hard time listening in and intercepting fax communications. Indeed it was the explosion in the numbers of fax machines that was made possible by Gotbachev's reforms that made organising resistance to the communist coup of 1991 possible. In a real sense information technology was one of the major factors that brought an end to the USSR. I understand that television was different in the old USSR as well. While we in the west would watch the television for entertainment - in the USSR, the TV watches you. The reality of TV in the old USSR was more prosaic. It was just plain boring. There were few decent arts programmes and some opera/ballet which were Ok but for the most part it was incredibly dull. They were quite creative when it came to ensuring that people only listened to 'approved' radio stations as I recall. They made really cheap radios that had only presets that were tuned to the frequencies of government approved stations. Still most people preferred the news from BBC World Service. Keith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"Dave Kearton" wrote in message ... "Michael Petukhov" wrote in message | | Disagree. If USSR would exist now Internet would be very well | known and in use. There would be certainly some restrictions | like those recently reported in China for instance which certainly | cannot significantly stop free spread of information. Like | a telephone for instance it is simply too important invention in order | anyone can ignore or ban it. BTW telephone was pretty well known | in USSR as well as all other telecommunication technologies | known in the world. However there is irony indeed that internet (US invention) | kills US propaganda media by free disrtibution of true info and true | foreign public opinions on US politics in US itself. | | Michael Whats really funny is that Micheal has neglected to mention how paranoid the Soviet authorities were about technology. Which technology? USSR was number 1 or number 2 in almost all technology areas with only possible exception of computers where it was number 3 or 4. Photocopiers and duplicating machines were rigidly controlled and licensed lest people use them for publishing counter revolutionary documents and the Fax machines had them in a real tizzy since with the technology available the authorities had a hard time listening in and intercepting fax communications. Well partly true. photocopiers and faxes were not available in shops for general public. Although it was available in offices. I am not aware of anyone who wanted to copy "counter revolutionary documents" at any time. Maybe a very few so called dissidents which were never more than 200-300 for all USSR. general public did not cared about any such documents then and now. I do remmeber that when we wanted to have copy of Bulgakov novel "Master and Margarite" possible but very difficult to find in a shop we (10 students) just typed it and printed in an office printer. As for photocopiers and faxes, I think it was not available in the shops simply because at that time it was too big and expansive mashines and given rather low incomes of population there would no significant demand. Indeed it was the explosion in the numbers of fax machines that was made possible by Gotbachev's reforms that made organising resistance to the communist coup of 1991 possible. Hm... After all these years we do not so sure there was a "coup" and "organising resistance". The faxes were already in big numbers since many privat and state companies certainly had ones for ages. In a real sense information technology was one of the major factors that brought an end to the USSR. I understand that television was different in the old USSR as well. While we in the west would watch the television for entertainment - in the USSR, the TV watches you. The reality of TV in the old USSR was more prosaic. It was just plain boring. There were few decent arts programmes and some opera/ballet which were Ok but for the most part it was incredibly dull. They were quite creative when it came to ensuring that people only listened to 'approved' radio stations as I recall. They made really cheap radios that had only presets that were tuned to the frequencies of government approved stations. partly true. Although it was less boring than western TV cud (particularly in US), in my taste certainly. There was lost of sports, many good movies and arts and very little politics. Most people was interesting in mostly their personal lifes, and nobody was affraid of their future. Anyone could walk at any place of a town and at any time of day or night. Totally diffrent atmosphere as it is now in many places. BTW in my house now anyone can watch any western station for very little fee. And what? Yes no demand whatsoever. I know because a cable company worker came to ask if we would like to subscribe and complained nobody wanted and they probably would have to disconnect all this rubbish. Michael Still most people preferred the news from BBC World Service. No, BBC was not very popular due to its elevated stupidity. I mean russian branch of BBC. English BBC radio was always fine. Russian branch was populated mostly by old sick russian clouns whose the anly advantage was they "selected freedom". They are all still there and did not learn anything since that time. Voice of America was indeed rather good and popular. Michael Keith |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Petukhov" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Dave Kearton" wrote in message ... "Michael Petukhov" wrote in message | | Disagree. If USSR would exist now Internet would be very well | known and in use. There would be certainly some restrictions | like those recently reported in China for instance which certainly | cannot significantly stop free spread of information. Like | a telephone for instance it is simply too important invention in order | anyone can ignore or ban it. BTW telephone was pretty well known | in USSR as well as all other telecommunication technologies | known in the world. However there is irony indeed that internet (US invention) | kills US propaganda media by free disrtibution of true info and true | foreign public opinions on US politics in US itself. | | Michael Whats really funny is that Micheal has neglected to mention how paranoid the Soviet authorities were about technology. Which technology? USSR was number 1 or number 2 in almost all technology areas with only possible exception of computers where it was number 3 or 4. Information technology, as a member of a team who gave a number of talks to various Soviet Ministries in 1988 I can assure you the USSR was not high on the list of capability. Photocopiers and duplicating machines were rigidly controlled and licensed lest people use them for publishing counter revolutionary documents and the Fax machines had them in a real tizzy since with the technology available the authorities had a hard time listening in and intercepting fax communications. Well partly true. photocopiers and faxes were not available in shops for general public. Although it was available in offices. I am not aware of anyone who wanted to copy "counter revolutionary documents" at any time. Maybe a very few so called dissidents which were never more than 200-300 for all USSR. general public did not cared about any such documents then and now. I do remmeber that when we wanted to have copy of Bulgakov novel "Master and Margarite" possible but very difficult to find in a shop we (10 students) just typed it and printed in an office printer. As for photocopiers and faxes, I think it was not available in the shops simply because at that time it was too big and expansive mashines and given rather low incomes of population there would no significant demand. Strangely every small club, scout troop and students union in Britain had discovered a need for such equipment and the cost was quite low. Of course it wasnt a crime here to have an unlicensed copier. Indeed it was the explosion in the numbers of fax machines that was made possible by Gotbachev's reforms that made organising resistance to the communist coup of 1991 possible. Hm... After all these years we do not so sure there was a "coup" and "organising resistance". The faxes were already in big numbers since many privat and state companies certainly had ones for ages. Not in 1988 they didnt, we had major problems getting permission to install one in our Moscow office in 1998 In a real sense information technology was one of the major factors that brought an end to the USSR. I understand that television was different in the old USSR as well. While we in the west would watch the television for entertainment - in the USSR, the TV watches you. The reality of TV in the old USSR was more prosaic. It was just plain boring. There were few decent arts programmes and some opera/ballet which were Ok but for the most part it was incredibly dull. They were quite creative when it came to ensuring that people only listened to 'approved' radio stations as I recall. They made really cheap radios that had only presets that were tuned to the frequencies of government approved stations. partly true. Although it was less boring than western TV cud (particularly in US), in my taste certainly. There was lost of sports, many good movies and arts and very little politics. Most people was interesting in mostly their personal lifes, and nobody was affraid of their future. Anyone could walk at any place of a town and at any time of day or night. You have to be joking. By 1988 things were easing but during my first business trip to the USSR in 1974 people were VERY careful about who they talked frankly to. Totally diffrent atmosphere as it is now in many places. BTW in my house now anyone can watch any western station for very little fee. And what? Yes no demand whatsoever. I know because a cable company worker came to ask if we would like to subscribe and complained nobody wanted and they probably would have to disconnect all this rubbish. Ah a truly objective sample - NOT Keith |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"Michael Petukhov" wrote in message om... "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Dave Kearton" wrote in message ... "Michael Petukhov" wrote in message | | Disagree. If USSR would exist now Internet would be very well | known and in use. There would be certainly some restrictions | like those recently reported in China for instance which certainly | cannot significantly stop free spread of information. Like | a telephone for instance it is simply too important invention in order | anyone can ignore or ban it. BTW telephone was pretty well known | in USSR as well as all other telecommunication technologies | known in the world. However there is irony indeed that internet (US invention) | kills US propaganda media by free disrtibution of true info and true | foreign public opinions on US politics in US itself. | | Michael Whats really funny is that Micheal has neglected to mention how paranoid the Soviet authorities were about technology. Which technology? USSR was number 1 or number 2 in almost all technology areas with only possible exception of computers where it was number 3 or 4. Information technology, as a member of a team who gave a number of talks to various Soviet Ministries in 1988 I can assure you the USSR was not high on the list of capability. When and what exactly are you talking about? Photocopiers and duplicating machines were rigidly controlled and licensed lest people use them for publishing counter revolutionary documents and the Fax machines had them in a real tizzy since with the technology available the authorities had a hard time listening in and intercepting fax communications. Well partly true. photocopiers and faxes were not available in shops for general public. Although it was available in offices. I am not aware of anyone who wanted to copy "counter revolutionary documents" at any time. Maybe a very few so called dissidents which were never more than 200-300 for all USSR. general public did not cared about any such documents then and now. I do remmeber that when we wanted to have copy of Bulgakov novel "Master and Margarite" possible but very difficult to find in a shop we (10 students) just typed it and printed in an office printer. As for photocopiers and faxes, I think it was not available in the shops simply because at that time it was too big and expansive mashines and given rather low incomes of population there would no significant demand. Strangely every small club, scout troop and students union in Britain had discovered a need for such equipment and the cost was quite low. Of course it wasnt a crime here to have an unlicensed copier. It was not a crime in USSR as well. But at that time soviet model of photocopier (huge and heavy, office format) costed I think in the range of several 10000s of rubbles while average salary was in range of a few 100s. Foreign cheap portable models were not allowed for import. Who and why someone would want to buy it? All this stuff was avaibale office in big numbers. Indeed it was the explosion in the numbers of fax machines that was made possible by Gotbachev's reforms that made organising resistance to the communist coup of 1991 possible. Hm... After all these years we do not so sure there was a "coup" and "organising resistance". The faxes were already in big numbers since many privat and state companies certainly had ones for ages. Not in 1988 they didnt, we had major problems getting permission to install one in our Moscow office in 1998 Well. we are talking about 1991? My institute as far as I remmeber always had a fax mashine. I have installed our first email system in 1990 as far as I rememeber. At that time in Moscow almost every computer belonging to my friends had a modem and email connection. Should I remind you that at that time there was no WWW. And most of western users were just at the same email level. I remmeber there was a company offering telnet service but the costs were high and we did not find any reasons to buy that. We simply had no places to telnet. In a real sense information technology was one of the major factors that brought an end to the USSR. I understand that television was different in the old USSR as well. While we in the west would watch the television for entertainment - in the USSR, the TV watches you. The reality of TV in the old USSR was more prosaic. It was just plain boring. There were few decent arts programmes and some opera/ballet which were Ok but for the most part it was incredibly dull. They were quite creative when it came to ensuring that people only listened to 'approved' radio stations as I recall. They made really cheap radios that had only presets that were tuned to the frequencies of government approved stations. partly true. Although it was less boring than western TV cud (particularly in US), in my taste certainly. There was lost of sports, many good movies and arts and very little politics. Most people was interesting in mostly their personal lifes, and nobody was affraid of their future. Anyone could walk at any place of a town and at any time of day or night. You have to be joking. By 1988 things were easing but during my first business trip to the USSR in 1974 people were VERY careful about who they talked frankly to. I think anyone must be VERY careful about who they talked frankly to. But I know what you mean. if you are not a plain stupid you had to quickly understand that the people who had job connected to foreigners were rather different from the rest of us. It was a sort of moscow mafia. It was profitable and very difficult to get job. All these was not due to political restrictions, even at that time nobody of them cared about politics. They cared more what they could get from you. You know what I mean, Keith. Right? Totally diffrent atmosphere as it is now in many places. BTW in my house now anyone can watch any western station for very little fee. And what? Yes no demand whatsoever. I know because a cable company worker came to ask if we would like to subscribe and complained nobody wanted and they probably would have to disconnect all this rubbish. Ah a truly objective sample - NOT Maybe not so. But russia still is the only county I know where you can watch CNN only in foreigner oriented hotels, and even not in each of it. Michael Keith |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael Petukhov wrote: "Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ... "Dave Kearton" wrote in message ... "Michael Petukhov" wrote in message | | Disagree. If USSR would exist now Internet would be very well | known and in use. There would be certainly some restrictions | like those recently reported in China for instance which certainly | cannot significantly stop free spread of information. Like | a telephone for instance it is simply too important invention in order | anyone can ignore or ban it. BTW telephone was pretty well known | in USSR as well as all other telecommunication technologies | known in the world. However there is irony indeed that internet (US invention) | kills US propaganda media by free disrtibution of true info and true | foreign public opinions on US politics in US itself. | | Michael Whats really funny is that Micheal has neglected to mention how paranoid the Soviet authorities were about technology. Which technology? USSR was number 1 or number 2 in almost all technology areas with only possible exception of computers where it was number 3 or 4. snip I have to hand it to you, Michael -- you're the funniest Russian since Yakov Smirnov. Speaking of which, if you're ever looking for work, maybe you could find a job at one of his theaters in Branson -- http://www.yakov.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
under the old Soviet system you would never have even known
existed. Such irony. Disagree. If USSR would exist now Internet would be very well known and in use. .....by all three of the people that could afford computers. Of coures, there would also be a KGB guy standing over their shoulder, copying down every website they visited. There would be certainly some restrictions like those recently reported in China for instance which certainly cannot significantly stop free spread of information. If the government can tell you which sites to visit, its not "free spread" of anything. Like a telephone for instance it is simply too important invention in order anyone can ignore or ban it. BTW telephone was pretty well known in USSR as well as all other telecommunication technologies Right, Comrade... tell us how free it was under the Old System that you knew and loved so well However there is irony indeed that internet (US invention) kills US propaganda media by free disrtibution of true info and true foreign public opinions on US politics in US itself. Sorta proves that our government doesn't bother trying to restrict access. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT (sorta): Bush Will Announce New Space Missions | Dav1936531 | Military Aviation | 0 | January 9th 04 10:34 AM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
The most probable origin of NASA moon rocks | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 98 | October 29th 03 08:08 PM |