![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Stephen Harding
writes Paul J. Adam wrote: Sorry, but Hackworth is more interested in pandering to prejudice than rational analysis. (For instance, his cheerful bluster about the "useless" 9mm pistol and the "ineffective" M16 family... tell you what, he can stand in front of me and I'll put a few rounds from either into him; then he can tell me how "ineffective" they are) Although I've come around to your sort of opinion towards Hackworth, the "effectiveness" argument is sort of bogus isn't it? The argument is that these weapons are apparently so lacking in lethality that enemy soldiers laugh off multiple hits, crying out "stop that, it tickles" - on the rare occasions when these weapons apparently fire at all, they apparently being so unreliably that it's a miracle any US soldiers ever get a round off in combat before their weapons permanently jam. Hackworth's vilifying the M-16 family in a way that makes the L85 look like a paragon of reliability (oddly enough, the L85 _did_ perform very well during TELIC) A muzzle loading, black powder Kentucky Rifle would be "effective" under such a test, no? Most definitely - the complaints are reliability and lethality, and a well-handled muzzle loader should do well on both scores provided the weather's not too damp ![]() in rain, et cetera are not measures of effectiveness Hackworth mentions so I'm leaving them out too. His rules, not mine. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Kevin Brooks
writes "Paul J. Adam" wrote in message ... "British timidity"? Just how many reservists was the US mobilising for a ground offensive into Kosovo? I seem to recall the option being categorically ruled out in the US... but we were getting ready to sign Queen's Orders. Personally, I could care less what Hackworth has to say about anything--IMO he is a bit like James Dunnigan and Tom Clancy, in that he apparently enamored with the sound of his own voice and impresses himself if nobody else. But Paul, you do need to go back and check your facts--while Clinton & Company had indeed ruled out the ground option early on (rating as one of his administration's bigger military mistakes--it was stupid to give Milosevich the additional breathing room it afforded him), they did subsequently revisit the issue, Sure, and never claimed otherwise. But the US _did_ rule it out (and then change its mind), while here in the UK many of us were getting ready for mobilisation despite a few years away from the colours. The US was able to reverse course without having to call up reserves: not an option for others, particularly when the US was still mumbling "no ground troops under any circumstances". The US made a mistake and successfully reversed it, and I'm not attacking that: just the unspecified claims of "British timidity". Refusal to obey really stupid orders, perhaps, but not timidity. Sorry, but Hackworth is more interested in pandering to prejudice than rational analysis. (For instance, his cheerful bluster about the "useless" 9mm pistol and the "ineffective" M16 family... tell you what, he can stand in front of me and I'll put a few rounds from either into him; then he can tell me how "ineffective" they are) He has also spent his ire at other US targets--he was especially deriscive of the National Guard (though he has apparently piped down on that one over the last year or two). A quick poke around SFTT suggests not, at the moment: he's making the British argument of STABs versus ARABs look like a friendly debate at the moment. It seems the US National Guard units are untrained, unskilled, and laden with huge numbers of unfit freeloaders who never report and can't deploy but can justify claims for pay'n'rations... with only heroic interventions by Regular troops saving them from certain disaster. One wonders how such bumbling amateurs managed to survive in a warzone, let alone make any sort of useful contribution: yet rather more than a few have apparently deployed and served, and I don't hear tales of "Weeping National Guard wimps slaughtered as Regular heroes hold firm and fight to last round". Oh, well... where reality conflicts with a lucrative column, presumably reality simply hasn't been properly informed and will eventually fall into line. Just make sure you don't shoot him where he wore that unauthorized ranger tab he was bragging about... Having been trained by a few Paras and a bootneck or two, and working with both now, I imagine this is similar to wearing a red or green beret without having passed P Company or the Commando Course. (Neither are recommended strategies, if you couldn't guess). And I recall that Chief of Naval Operations Jim Boorda committed suicide over being accused of falsely wearing decorations he hadn't earned... perhaps an extreme reaction, but interesting to compare. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
#123
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well, I earned the privilege, but haven't flown as pilot in command in many years. I never had the urge to go to work for the airlines and there's nothing (short of maybe "warbird" ops) that would equate with flying tactical jets. People often ask, why I didn't go with the airlines and my answer is always the same, "would you ask Mario Andretti why he didn't start driving for Greyhound when he retired from racing?" Ed Rasimus Same with me. Never could get offered a pilot slot, bad timing, and the thought of airline flying just does not do it for me. Looks like I might just end up flying a DC-4 on fires this summer... Ron Pilot/Wildland Firefighter |
#125
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote:
Well, I earned the privilege, but haven't flown as pilot in command in many years. I never had the urge to go to work for the airlines and there's nothing (short of maybe "warbird" ops) that would equate with flying tactical jets. I dunno Ed, I know a few guys who flew fighters and this is what one of them (a former A-7, F-106 and F-16 jock) had to say: Q: So Jim how does flying a trike compare to flying a fighter on the fun scale? A: Equal, but different. Way different. I like all types of flying, but they are all fun in different ways. Flying trikes is probably the most natural sensation of flying like a bird, like you dream about, of any form of powered flight I've ever experienced. Flying fighters is like flying a Formula I race car with wings, except even more physically punishing. There's nothing like being at 100' and seeing the electrical line poles go by at 600 kts +, and there's nothing like cruising along at 50 mph waving at people and smelling the new cut hay and feeling like a puppy with your head out of the car window. I'm happy to have had the opportunity to experience both. I'd rate them both as 10's, but different forms of fun. If I had to pick one to experience in life and couldn't do the other, I'd pick fighters. Fortunately, I didn't have to pick just one. People often ask, why I didn't go with the airlines and my answer is always the same, "would you ask Mario Andretti why he didn't start driving for Greyhound when he retired from racing?" I can understand that but I think there may be something else going on there. In other words, maybe guys like you whom have pushed the envelope so many times in combat sense deep down that it's simply time to quit? |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Ron) wrote:
Ed Rasimus wrote: Well, I earned the privilege, but haven't flown as pilot in command in many years. I never had the urge to go to work for the airlines and there's nothing (short of maybe "warbird" ops) that would equate with flying tactical jets. People often ask, why I didn't go with the airlines and my answer is always the same, "would you ask Mario Andretti why he didn't start driving for Greyhound when he retired from racing?" Same with me. Never could get offered a pilot slot, bad timing, and the thought of airline flying just does not do it for me. Looks like I might just end up flying a DC-4 on fires this summer... Haven't flown fighters like Ed but I have flown single pilot IFR under Part 135 like you and no offense, but that DC-4 position sounds like just another uneviable, low-pay, low-prestige yet high-risk flying job. No thanks. |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Marron" wrote
Haven't flown fighters like Ed but I have flown single pilot IFR under Part 135 like you and no offense, but that DC-4 position sounds like just another uneviable, low-pay, low-prestige yet high-risk flying job. No thanks. On top of that, very little is done to tame the fires. In most cases the fires just keep burning until the weather changes. Water and Retardant bombers are like ****ing on a house fire. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Haven't flown fighters like Ed but I have flown single pilot IFR
under Part 135 like you and no offense, but that DC-4 position sounds like just another uneviable, low-pay, low-prestige yet high-risk flying job. No thanks. On top of that, very little is done to tame the fires. In most cases the fires just keep burning until the weather changes. Water and Retardant bombers are like ****ing on a house fire. Well it depends on the situation. Retardant is rarely dropped on a fire anyways. Its main use to to help get a fire under control so the people on the ground can get a handle on it. On smaller fires, it definitely makes a big different, but on larger firestorms like what was in San Diego last year and Yellowstone in 88, they do not always have a big impact. Ron Pilot/Wildland Firefighter |
#129
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul J. Adam" wrote in message ... In message , Kevin Brooks snip He has also spent his ire at other US targets--he was especially deriscive of the National Guard (though he has apparently piped down on that one over the last year or two). A quick poke around SFTT suggests not, at the moment: he's making the British argument of STABs versus ARABs look like a friendly debate at the moment. It seems the US National Guard units are untrained, unskilled, and laden with huge numbers of unfit freeloaders who never report and can't deploy but can justify claims for pay'n'rations... with only heroic interventions by Regular troops saving them from certain disaster. One wonders how such bumbling amateurs managed to survive in a warzone, let alone make any sort of useful contribution: yet rather more than a few have apparently deployed and served, and I don't hear tales of "Weeping National Guard wimps slaughtered as Regular heroes hold firm and fight to last round". He must have missed the close combat operations conducted by the light infantry battalion out of the FLARNG in Iraq, the various SF operations conducted by 19th and 20th SFG (both ARNG assets) troops in Afghanistan (and other places), the ARNG combat engineers, truck drivers, etc., who have suffered their fair share of casualties in Iraq, etc. Like I said before, the guy apparently just brays to hear the discordant sound of his own voice. Oh, well... where reality conflicts with a lucrative column, presumably reality simply hasn't been properly informed and will eventually fall into line. Just make sure you don't shoot him where he wore that unauthorized ranger tab he was bragging about... Having been trained by a few Paras and a bootneck or two, and working with both now, I imagine this is similar to wearing a red or green beret without having passed P Company or the Commando Course. (Neither are recommended strategies, if you couldn't guess). And I recall that Chief of Naval Operations Jim Boorda committed suicide over being accused of falsely wearing decorations he hadn't earned... perhaps an extreme reaction, but interesting to compare. You were aware that he was intimately involved in that affair? He was the goober who "tipped off" Newsweek magazine about Boorda's decorations, and a week after the suicide he was all over the media bellyaching about the sanctity of decorations...then he got sort of quiet about that after his unauthorized Ranger tab was mentioned. He used to portray himself as "America's most decorated soldier"...and then the Department of the Army stated that there was no such a beast (and one wonders what the surviving MoH winners thought of his claim). The guy is scum, plain and simple. He was danged lucky to have been able to retire--there was serious consideration given to courts martialing him after he went to the media with his "get out of Vietnam" crap while he was still a serving officer. Brooks Paul J. Adam |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Chris Thomas a Real Pilot? | jls | Home Built | 147 | September 14th 04 03:03 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |