![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Thornley" wrote in message ... In article , Spiv wrote: I know exactly what they are. Overseas territories, are just that, no matter what the sovereign state calls them. If you are going to suggest that Alaska and Hawaii are not part of the US, Yes I am. Alaska has a lot of Canada between it and the USA. you're suggesting something that nobody will agree with. I couldn't care. BTW, local Hawaiians want independence. The US stole the islands. It has now more westerners on it than locals. Now, if the US can be geographically split, why can't France or Denmark? Without actually looking at a globe, I'd imagine that Greenland is closer to continental Denmark than Hawaii is to the continental US. -- David H. Thornley | If you want my opinion, ask. | If you don't, flee. http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Spiv wrote:
"David Thornley" wrote in message m... In article , Spiv wrote: I know exactly what they are. Overseas territories, are just that, no matter what the sovereign state calls them. If you are going to suggest that Alaska and Hawaii are not part of the US, Yes I am. Alaska has a lot of Canada between it and the USA. If you're going to talk some language vaguely related to English, as opposed to English, you might as well let us know beforehand. Alaska and Hawaii are part of the US. Between WWI and WWII, East Prussia was part of Germany. Why is this so difficult to understand? you're suggesting something that nobody will agree with. I couldn't care. Obviously. Here's a clue: if you want to get anything out of participation in Usenet, you really should be able to communicate. Disagreeing with entire national populations about what a country is does not seem, to me, like communicating. BTW, local Hawaiians want independence. The US stole the islands. It has now more westerners on it than locals. Granted that the US stole the islands, like a lot of other US territory, are you sure the locals want independence? I wouldn't be surprised to find some do; on Puerto Rico (stolen in the 1898 war) there are a good number of people who want independence, a good number who want statehood, and a larger number who like the status quo. BTW, "has now more westerners on it than locals" is a fairly good description of most of the US, given suitable definitions of "westerners" and "locals". -- David H. Thornley | If you want my opinion, ask. | If you don't, flee. http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Thornley" wrote in message ... In article , Spiv wrote: "David Thornley" wrote in message m... In article , Spiv wrote: I know exactly what they are. Overseas territories, are just that, no matter what the sovereign state calls them. If you are going to suggest that Alaska and Hawaii are not part of the US, Yes I am. Alaska has a lot of Canada between it and the USA. If you're going to talk some language vaguely related to English, as opposed to English, you might as well let us know beforehand. Alaska and Hawaii are part of the US. As is are the Falklands a part of the UK if we go to the point of who has sovereignty. However these places are not a part of the main mother. They are detached and acquired much later. Between WWI and WWII, East Prussia was part of Germany. And it disappeared because it was not a part of the mother country. you're suggesting something that nobody will agree with. I couldn't care. Obviously. Here's a clue: if you want to get anything out of participation in Usenet, you really should be able to communicate. Disagreeing with entire national populations about what a country is does not seem, to me, like communicating. BTW, local Hawaiians want independence. The US stole the islands. It has now more westerners on it than locals. Granted that the US stole the islands, like a lot of other US territory, are you sure the locals want independence? Last I read. I wouldn't be surprised to find some do; on Puerto Rico (stolen in the 1898 war) Not a part of the USA apparently being some sort of protectorate as are the US Virgin Islands. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Spiv" wrote:
"David Thornley" wrote in message ... Granted that the US stole the islands, like a lot of other US territory, are you sure the locals want independence? Last I read. This thread would lead most sane people to believe you don't actually have that in your skill set. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Spiv wrote:
"David Thornley" wrote in message m... In article , Spiv wrote: Yes I am. Alaska has a lot of Canada between it and the USA. If you're going to talk some language vaguely related to English, as opposed to English, you might as well let us know beforehand. Alaska and Hawaii are part of the US. As is are the Falklands a part of the UK if we go to the point of who has sovereignty. Sovereignity is not the issue here. Do the people who live in the Falklands vote for members of the Parliament that sits in London? Do they have UK citizenship? It is possible to have sovereignity over a territory without it being a part of the sovereign country. That's not the point here. However these places are not a part of the main mother. They are detached and acquired much later. Some are, some aren't. The Falklands is not a part of the UK in the same way Hawaii is part of the US. Between WWI and WWII, East Prussia was part of Germany. And it disappeared because it was not a part of the mother country. No, it disappeared along with a good chunk of Silesia, in a Stalin-dictated border shift. Granted that the US stole the islands, like a lot of other US territory, are you sure the locals want independence? Last I read. Could be. It really doesn't matter much, except to them. I wouldn't be surprised to find some do; on Puerto Rico (stolen in the 1898 war) Not a part of the USA apparently being some sort of protectorate as are the US Virgin Islands. Puerto Rico is in its own anomalous status, and it isn't really part of the US by the standards I set. It is conceivable that it could be formally independent within the next ten or twenty years, although it would surprise me. That isn't happening with Hawaii. -- David H. Thornley | If you want my opinion, ask. | If you don't, flee. http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lost comms after radar vector | Mike Ciholas | Instrument Flight Rules | 119 | January 31st 04 11:39 PM |
All Vietnam Veterans Were Awarded The Vietnam Cross of Gallantry | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 1st 03 12:07 AM |
Vietnam, any US planes lost in China ? | Mike | Military Aviation | 7 | November 4th 03 11:44 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
Attorney honored for heroism during the Vietnam War | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 6 | August 14th 03 11:59 PM |