![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 17, 1:43*am, Mark Dickson wrote:
Sorry, but thermalling gliders will almost always show on radar. * At 23:39 16 October 2010, John Smith wrote: Mark Dickson wrote: No, it's Ryanair. *They always look for direct routings, even if it takes them outside controlled airspace. They can ask as much as they want, it's the controller authority to allow it or not. But how can I explain this to somebody who doesn't even know that class E airspace is controlled? Contrary to popular myth, gliders show as a primary return on radar displays Contrary to popular myth, stationary primary targets are filtered out by the radar software, hence thermalling gliders don't show on the controller's display. John is right, and we need to be careful with claims like this because misunderstanding around statements like this can lead people to dismiss the role of transponders in providing a valuable tool for traffic awareness/separation, especially near those airliners and fast jets. The answer is both yes (from a technically possible viewpoint) but in practice it is almost certainly no. A modern primary radar system will usually have no problem detecting a glider under benign circumstances, including a fiberglass glider (not carbon) -- there is enough metal in the glider to show up. However in practice to have the radar set to detect the glider the controllers will be seeing all kinds of ground and other clutter (birds, traffic on roads/freeways, wind turbines, ....). In practice in most places the Doppler discriminators aka "MTI" (Motion Target Indicator) will be set to reduce all this clutter and give the radar operator a usable display. In that practical situation they won't see slow speed gliders thermalling, those targets would have be removed by the MTI. It is not possible to say more without knowing the particular situation. The clutter and other issues, type of radar and target ranges and elevation etc. If it important you can followup with your local ATC radar facility and ask them. But I expect the answer in practice is they will not be able to usefully observe a glider from a primary radar return. And even if they could observe the glider the radar likely only provides location, with no elevation data. e.g. for all civil approach/ terminal radar in the USA. And even if a radar system (like the ARSR-4 used in the USA for civil en-route and CONUS surveillance) does provide some crude primary radar elevation data it is not always clear this is passed to particular ATC operators at all, and if it is it is unlikely to be useful for usual ATC separation services. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Swallow - Me 262 A-1a of KG 51 at Frankfurt 27 Mar 45.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 29th 07 03:33 AM |
Airports and Air Strips frankfurt.jpg (2/2) | J.F. | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 20th 07 02:07 AM |
Glider-Airliner Near Miss | jcarlyle | Soaring | 0 | June 12th 07 04:52 PM |
Why Screeners Miss Guns and Knives (and why pilots miss planes and airports) | cjcampbell | Piloting | 2 | January 3rd 06 04:24 AM |
ATC of Near-Miss over BOS | Marco Leon | Piloting | 40 | August 31st 05 01:53 PM |