![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Remde has argued that there would be a safety advantage in allowing
normal mode so that thermals in the vicinity could be located and assessed. I think it sounds like fun to be able to do that but I am skeptical about any net safety advantage. The problem that I see is that normal mode will dictate a significant amount of face down time. This would be especially true during the prestart gaggle time when it would be critical to see when other pilots are leaving on course and whether they are hitting decent lift. It is exactly the congested prestart period which is by far the most dangerous part of racing now even without that added distraction. Of course, Flarm itself helps to reduce the hazard but I doubt that setting ourselves up for maybe 10% or 20% face down time during the prestart interval is a really smart idea. Perhaps we can ask for a software feature that automatically forces competition mode until the glider has traveled say 15 miles from the launch point. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flarm in the US | Steve Freeman | Soaring | 163 | August 15th 10 12:12 AM |
Chinese J-XX ''stealth fighter''. - File 1 of 1 - Chinese J-XX ''stealth fighter''.jpg (1/1) | Troy[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 10 | June 10th 08 01:41 PM |
IGC FLARM DLL | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | March 25th 08 11:27 AM |
FLARM | Robert Hart | Soaring | 50 | March 16th 06 11:20 PM |
FLARM | John Galloway | Soaring | 9 | November 27th 04 07:16 AM |