![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 7:58*am, "a425couple" wrote:
"Paul J. Adam" wrote... In message , Dave Kearton writes IMHO Lt Osborn made all the right decisions under very trying circumstances. He kept the plane aloft, long enough for all the sensitive gear to be destroyed, Well, the last above line is the critical question! Did you read the original citehttp://readersupportednews.org/off-site-news-section/157-157/3730-the... The Online Threat Should we be worried about a cyber war? by Seymour M. Hersh Read morehttp://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/11/01/101101fa_fact_hersh?cur... and find it unconvincing? he KEPT HIS CREW ALIVE and what was left of the plane was flown back to the US after the Chinese were done with it. If you think worst-case, ditching or baling out offers the Chinese a nasty option. "We picked up nine of the crew, here they are. Mission Supervisor Snuffy, who knows all about what the aircraft can do and what its mission was? No, haven't found a trace of him, but we're still searching..." And who's to know different? Once the crew lose sight of each other, there's no way to know whether Supervisor Snuffy died during the bailout, drowned in the ocean, is on a slow fishing boat with no comms on his way to port, or is being forcibly persuaded to be detailed and explicit about EP-3 capabilities in a Beijing basement. Very interesting valid point of view, thanks. I certainly admit that I do not know what 'equipment' and software was destroyed and what was still discoverable. I'm also not sure how knowledgable the crew was! For example, in WWII it was policy that nobody who had knowledge of important secrets should ever be allowed in areas where it might be possible to be captured. For example, anyone who even knew that we were able to decipher the Japanese messages (MAGIC) was not to be in harms way *. The crew are the real prize which could compromise the capability: Are you really sure about that? Knowing how to use a computer program, does not at all mean, you know the program. *Or the equipment that runs the program. * Leatherneck: Star-Crossed Translator Story by Dick Camp Second Lt Merle Ralph Cory was an expert cryptanalyst, who, ---- *joined the Corps and went to war. His comprehensive knowledge of the American code-breaking successes caused many to second-guess the decision that allowed him to risk capture by the Japanese. ((It was no "decision", he just slipped through the cracks.)) ((he had gone on a 'patrol', and was killed)) Ralph Cory should never have been ---- at Guadalcanal. It was government policy that anyone connected with MAGIC was expressly prohibited from combat or duty that put them in close proximity to the enemy. He slipped through the cracks ---. 2004 Leatherneck Magazine. All rights reserved. Anything from Seymour Hersh is unconvincing. He's had an anti-military bent ever since the '60s. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 4:08*pm, Matt Wiser wrote:
On Oct 29, 7:58*am, "a425couple" wrote: "Paul J. Adam" wrote... In message , Dave Kearton writes IMHO Lt Osborn made all the right decisions under very trying circumstances. He kept the plane aloft, long enough for all the sensitive gear to be destroyed, Well, the last above line is the critical question! Did you read the original citehttp://readersupportednews.org/off-site-news-section/157-157/3730-the... The Online Threat Should we be worried about a cyber war? by Seymour M. Hersh Read morehttp://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/11/01/101101fa_fact_hersh?cur... and find it unconvincing? he KEPT HIS CREW ALIVE and what was left of the plane was flown back to the US after the Chinese were done with it. If you think worst-case, ditching or baling out offers the Chinese a nasty option. "We picked up nine of the crew, here they are. Mission Supervisor Snuffy, who knows all about what the aircraft can do and what its mission was? No, haven't found a trace of him, but we're still searching..." And who's to know different? Once the crew lose sight of each other, there's no way to know whether Supervisor Snuffy died during the bailout, drowned in the ocean, is on a slow fishing boat with no comms on his way to port, or is being forcibly persuaded to be detailed and explicit about EP-3 capabilities in a Beijing basement. Very interesting valid point of view, thanks. I certainly admit that I do not know what 'equipment' and software was destroyed and what was still discoverable. I'm also not sure how knowledgable the crew was! For example, in WWII it was policy that nobody who had knowledge of important secrets should ever be allowed in areas where it might be possible to be captured. For example, anyone who even knew that we were able to decipher the Japanese messages (MAGIC) was not to be in harms way *. The crew are the real prize which could compromise the capability: Are you really sure about that? Knowing how to use a computer program, does not at all mean, you know the program. *Or the equipment that runs the program. * Leatherneck: Star-Crossed Translator Story by Dick Camp Second Lt Merle Ralph Cory was an expert cryptanalyst, who, ---- *joined the Corps and went to war. His comprehensive knowledge of the American code-breaking successes caused many to second-guess the decision that allowed him to risk capture by the Japanese. ((It was no "decision", he just slipped through the cracks.)) ((he had gone on a 'patrol', and was killed)) Ralph Cory should never have been ---- at Guadalcanal. It was government policy that anyone connected with MAGIC was expressly prohibited from combat or duty that put them in close proximity to the enemy. He slipped through the cracks ---. 2004 Leatherneck Magazine. All rights reserved. Anything from Seymour Hersh is unconvincing. He's had an anti-military bent ever since the '60s. He may be anti military, but he does have his sources. Consider, if the powers that be do something stupid and the peons at the bottom don't like it, they do talk to reporters like a sieve. And DC is bad about that. I don't know why people with a clearance feel the need to leak. I remember some GS whatevers, that really knew better shooting their mouths off on stuff they should never had knowledge of. We're trying to keep it secret and compartementalized, meanwhile some damned bureaucrat is running his mouth all over the base. Go figure. Which is why some people never told their wives anything. I'd never tell mine anything. She's blabs. I get back in the real world, not ever sure I'd tell her where I was. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PanAm flt943 ditching | Private | Piloting | 0 | February 18th 09 06:26 AM |
Information on Ditching | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 2 | May 5th 05 02:19 AM |
Ditching at Sea | Mike Keown | Naval Aviation | 5 | November 17th 03 09:58 PM |
Ditching Gear Down | Dave Kearton | Military Aviation | 18 | October 7th 03 10:27 PM |
Ditching Gear Down | Mike Keown | Naval Aviation | 6 | October 6th 03 04:39 PM |