![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi John,
Well said. Just to be clear - I am not in favor of mandating anything. I don't want to mandate the use of FLARM at all. My hope is that enough people will start using FLARM that the others will hear how great it is and then also buy one. If there are a few hold-outs (after a year or 2 or 3) that are the only people not using FLARM at a contest or crowded gliderport or along a crowded ridge - I imagine they will be pressured by the other competitors (hopefully in a friendly way) to buy one. I agree that it will be tough to make any big decisions until we have a lot more experience. But that makes it tough to make rules for 2011 contests. I'm glad I'm not on the U.S. Contest Rules Committee this year. : ) Best Regards, Paul Remde "John Cochrane" wrote in message ... As we think about this, I also think we need help on the practicalities of a stealth mode requirement. First, It seems we would need a cockpit check to make sure a competitor doesn't have a second flarm driving his PDA, so a few buddies can fly "team mode" while everyone else has stealth on. Then we need to demand Flarm IGC files every day from every competitor, the scorer would have to know what to look for to check both stealth status and security. Finally we would need a system of penalties for missing flarm files or security failures of the flarm files (can't have guys editing it on notepad to change the stealth indication). Is this how it works in countries (UK?) that are imposing a stealth mode requirement? Is all that working out? I know at WGC there was a stealth mode requirement that everybody ignored. This does not seem like the right outcome. Second, how do you insist on stealth and not also ban PCAS (zaon xrx), or ADS-B traffic receivers and displays? Many gliders are equipped with transponders, and more so will be in the future. GA ADS-B receivers are on their way as their many advocates on other flarm threads like to point out; not very good for glider collision avoidance, but inevitably will show you everything with a transponder in a 5 mile range. Are we going to ban all traffic alert systems, or without glider specific filters? This doesn't seem possible or wise. From those with strong opinions we should require stealth mode right, now, explaining the practicalities would help. And I'm curious how other countries that are requiring stealth mode are dealing with these problems. My brain hurts... John Cochrane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flarm in the US | Steve Freeman | Soaring | 163 | August 15th 10 12:12 AM |
Chinese J-XX ''stealth fighter''. - File 1 of 1 - Chinese J-XX ''stealth fighter''.jpg (1/1) | Troy[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 10 | June 10th 08 01:41 PM |
IGC FLARM DLL | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | March 25th 08 11:27 AM |
FLARM | Robert Hart | Soaring | 50 | March 16th 06 11:20 PM |
FLARM | John Galloway | Soaring | 9 | November 27th 04 07:16 AM |