![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am 18.11.2010 11:45, Don Johnstone wrote:
At 01:05 18 November 2010, PCool wrote: "Don Johnstone" ha scritto nel messaggio ... At 03:18 17 November 2010, Paul Remde wrote: Well done. The first is that the use of STEALTH mode degrades the performance of an instrument which is designed to enhance flight safety. While it is fine for an individual pilot to make a decision to do that I am extremely uncomfortable with requiring someone to degrade a unit and therefore safety. I am pretty sure that even a British court would take a very dim view of that were there to be an accident. Whether a court would find me personally liable I have no way of knowing and given the only way of finding out I prefer to remain ignorant. No, FLARM units are always transmitting correct position each other. Only the PDA output is degraded. But if you are close each other, output is no more degraded concerning nearby traffic. It is well thought. See http://www.flarm.com/support/Flarm_Competitions.pdf The warnings you may receive, and the data transmitted giving others warning are degraded, maybe not by much but they are degraded. The document above talks about 2 seconds. Would a jury understand this? The documentation accepts that the warnings that might be transmitted and received are degraded with some information unavailable. While we as glider pilots might understand that the effect is small a non glider pilot, especially a lawyer, might argue that any degredation is unacceptable. While individual pilots might make the decision by themselves, mandating a requirement puts the responsibility on the organisation/directors of competitions. Having a unit designed as a safety aid and then deliberately restricting it is any way is not likely to win favour in legal circles. Who is going to get sued if it all goes wrong? Don, there is a difference between "Competition Mode" and "Stealth Mode". I guess the wording could be better, but fact is that only Stealth Mode was in question to be mandatory in competitions. Stealth mode has in fact effects not only on your FLARM unit but also on others in obfuscating your height and climb rate, except for warnings. Competition Mode on the other hand is a setting that only affects the FLARM unit where it is set, resulting in less (and/or later) alarms. It only affects the pilot that choose to set that mode, either via FLARM-Tool Software or via the config file on th SD-Card. Alternativly you could turn the sound off or down if you get annoyed by too many alarm signals. I tried this mode during some days in a competition, but then turned it off again in favour of reducing the warning level when a gaggle situation lead to too many signals that were not a real threat. I can assure you that much of the confusion will go away once you have flown with FLARM for several days in different situation. In fact I am sure most of you will love it. It is a great enhancement for security. -- Peter Scholz ASW24 JE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OLC 2011 | dhaluza | Soaring | 12 | October 22nd 10 12:02 AM |
OLC Scoring for 2011 | robert hunter | Soaring | 23 | October 21st 10 11:34 PM |
OLC Scoring for 2011 | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 9 | October 17th 10 03:41 AM |
2011 15M Nationals | Andy[_10_] | Soaring | 10 | August 19th 10 05:23 PM |
2011 USA 18M Nationals | 5 ugly | Soaring | 3 | August 18th 10 04:52 AM |