A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

THE PILOT WHO WOULDN'T FLY



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 9th 04, 03:32 PM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: THE PILOT WHO WOULDN'T FLY
From: (Michael)
Date: 2/9/04 7:23 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

(BUFDRVR) wrote in message
...
do you think fighter and bomber pilots (in
general) have a completely diffferent mindset in regard to the final
missions of a tour? I know they're different breeds to begin with


I've often heard this, and I have trouble believing it. Usually the

"fighter
pilot" lable is defined as agressive, unshakeable and highly skilled

(someone
correct me if that's not the generalized definition).


I in no way want to imply that bomber men are inferior to figthers.
They both have to be unshakeable and highly skilled and even the
bomber pilot has to be aggressive to a certain extent. But there has
to be a different mindset for the fighter pilot if he's going to be
successful at shooting other men out of the sky or streaking low
through flak to drop bombs, compared with the mind set of a bomber
that has to flying straight and level and take what get's thrown up at
him.

The whole reason I brought this up was while you hear of WWII heavy
bomber crews wearing thin toward the end of their tours, you don't
hear the same thing about their brothers escorting them in fighters.
I'm wondering if that was because of a different mind sets to begin
with, or if it was because of different circumstances (fighters
weren't being lost in as great of numbers and they could hunt their
enemies down and kill them instead of sitting there waiting to be hit
by them). Maybe if they had had a higher attrition rate, they would
have started getting jumpy too as their tours neared completion? But
according to Ed, in Vietnam that didn't happen among fighters, if any
thing they got more confident and aggressive as things wound down for
them.

~Michael



I was there right to the bitter end. And as time went on and men got killed
just before the war ended, it gave us all a lot to think about.. But in bombers
you can't be :"careful" You flew your last mission just like your first. It
was all SOP all the way. No wiggle room whatever. Go to my website and read "
The Last To Die".



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? Badwater Bill Home Built 3 June 23rd 04 04:05 PM
definition of "dual controls" Lee Elson Instrument Flight Rules 4 April 24th 04 02:58 PM
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 41 November 20th 03 05:39 AM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.