![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 5, 11:00*am, lanebush wrote:
I am compelled to make a distinction between properly complying with the regulations and being in a noncompliance state. * Well I read all your post several times but I don't see where you make that distinction. Seems to me the two are equivalent in that failing to do one will always result in the other. I just spent over an hour going through the sections of Order 8130.2G that apply to group 1, and then reviewing my Operating Limitations. It is clear to me that my operating limitations do not comply with the group 1 requirements of 4113. They have several paragraphs that are not currently called out by the order and others do not match the wording of the boilerplate. I'm also puzzled by the fact that 4110 assigns a requirement for a geographic area only to groups 6 and 7. I don't see a requirement for a defined geographic area for group 1 (except for phase 1 flight test). Did I miss it or is this something that has changed since my operating limitations were issued in 2002. Did the 300nm radius requirement go away? No, I don't plan to call my local FSDO, but I will have a copy of Order 8130.2G on hand if/when I become the target of a FSDO inspection. Andy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 5, 1:26*pm, Andy wrote:
On Dec 5, 11:00*am, lanebush wrote: I am compelled to make a distinction between properly complying with the regulations and being in a noncompliance state. * Well I read all your post several times but I don't see where you make that distinction. *Seems to me the two are equivalent in that failing to do one will always result in the other. I just spent over an hour going through the sections of Order 8130.2G that apply to group 1, and then reviewing my Operating Limitations. It is clear to me that my operating limitations do not comply with the group 1 requirements of 4113. They have several paragraphs that are not currently called out by the order and others do not match the wording of the boilerplate. I'm also puzzled by the fact that 4110 assigns a requirement for a geographic area only to groups 6 and 7. * I don't see a requirement for a defined geographic area for group 1 (except for phase 1 flight test). *Did I miss it or is this something that has changed since my operating limitations were issued in 2002. *Did the 300nm radius requirement go away? No, I don't plan to call my local FSDO, but I will have a copy of Order 8130.2G on hand if/when I become the target of a FSDO inspection. Andy The following web site has some good info on aircraft certification. Two weeks ago I met with an Atlanta FSDO inspector and we rewrote my operating limitations to clean up some outdated language. The 300 mile radius was in effect at that time. Try this website for more info http://www.faa-aircraft-certificatio...ir-racing.html Lane XF |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Standard D25 - New Standard D25 sun n fun 2010 (Custom).jpg | Glen in Orlando | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 22nd 10 11:49 PM |
experimental to standard certificate | shkdriver | Soaring | 20 | January 19th 10 09:25 AM |
Converting a glider from Experiemental to Standard Airworthiness | Peter[_1_] | Soaring | 2 | November 15th 09 06:20 AM |
Converting GPS info | [email protected] | Piloting | 9 | March 14th 06 01:36 AM |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |