X-37B landed Friday

On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 16:29:26 -0500, Ari Silverstein wrote:

On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 02:54:29 -0800 (PST), Mark. wrote:

Valid points within reason. By virtue of the fact that it
*is* military, right off the bat we know that cost has a far
different priority. The military can not only spend more due
to the fact that they won't go out of business, but they WILL
spend more due to nepotism. Cost overruns are business
as usual.

Bull**** and proof that you have never been involved in a Prime
Contractor relationship with the miliary.

Stupid git.

That you are.

I've since moved on to guitars, turbojets, alternative energy, and
Victory gardens. I've had a long and extensive career in the lifeguard
and swimming pool industry.

I remember convincing the chairman of the bank and head of the Georgia
Republican party to fly to Washington, D.C. and within 3 days bring me
a Small Business Admin. check for 350 thousand dollars. But what makes
me a creative genius when I founded a school of the arts in my name.

http://gayincarolina.jottit.com/my_main_squeeze

Mark IV - Sold Military Secrets to the Military