![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I own 3 experimental - amatuer builts which I thoroughly enjoy. However the restrictions on them are no where near as restrictive as experimental - racing/exhibition. So I wonder if I "substantially modify" a certified glider (such as adding winglets or Schuemannizing,) might I be able to successfully argue that it belongs in the amatuer built category? Paul G |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 11:48*am, gliderman wrote:
I own 3 experimental - amatuer builts which I thoroughly enjoy. However the restrictions on them are no where near as restrictive as experimental - racing/exhibition. So I wonder if I "substantially modify" a certified glider (such as adding winglets or Schuemannizing,) might I be able to successfully argue that it belongs in the amatuer built category? Paul G Maybe if it looks like a homebuilt when done. Report back on your results. LOL UH |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The restrictions on Exhibition/Racing are minimal if you negotiate the
Operating Limitations properly. You are simply Exhibiting when just flying around, or practising exhibiting, and when there is a contest, you are racing, or practicing for racing. Every time any pilot flies I'd say they are practicing and honing their skills really! Here are my flight area restrictions Negotiated in my Operating Limitations. "Prohibited from operating in congested airways or over densely populated areas, except for takeoffs and landings or unless directed by ATC or unless sufficient altitude is maintained to effect a safe emergency landing..." So in effect I can fly anywhere I have the equipment for with VFR. I don't have any range limitations nor Program letters to submit and no matter where I go, fly-ins, contests etc, I'm always practicing my skills to exhibit or race. "21.191 (d) Exhibition. Exhibiting the aircraft's flight capabilities, performance, or unusual characteristics at air shows, motion picture, television, and similar productions, and the maintenance of exhibition flight proficiency, including (for persons exhibiting aircraft) flying to and from such air shows and productions. (e) Air racing. Participating in air races, including (for such participants) practicing for such air races and flying to and from racing events." Not very restrictive, although flying for hire is one restriction I can think of. The whole process is not nearly as big a deal as others are lead to believe and the people who have not gone through the process are unjustifiably paranoid about it, although there has surely been a case or two that has not gone as well, but that is probably the exception more than the rule. Also my inspection by the FAA inspectors in 2010 took 20-30 minutes and cost $0 (They do not charge for C of A inspections) I think my C of A and OP Lims may have cost $5 if I recall correctly. You could also pay for a DAR to inspect if you are in a hurry and your FAA folks are very busy but you may only save a couple weeks as the DAR looses time having to send stuff in, while the FAA folks simply bring your paperwork to the inspection in person and sign it right there. On Dec 7, 11:39*am, wrote: On Dec 7, 11:48*am, gliderman wrote: I own 3 experimental - amatuer builts which I thoroughly enjoy. However the restrictions on them are no where near as restrictive as experimental - racing/exhibition. So I wonder if I "substantially modify" a certified glider (such as adding winglets or Schuemannizing,) might I be able to successfully argue that it belongs in the amatuer built category? Paul G Maybe if it looks like a homebuilt when done. Report back on your results. LOL UH |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 2:46*pm, jb92563 wrote:
The restrictions on Exhibition/Racing are minimal if you negotiate the Operating Limitations properly. You are simply Exhibiting when just flying around, or practising exhibiting, and when there is a contest, you are racing, or practicing for racing. Every time any pilot flies I'd say they are practicing and honing their skills really! Here are my flight area restrictions Negotiated in my Operating Limitations. "Prohibited from operating in congested airways or over densely populated areas, except for takeoffs and landings or unless directed by ATC or unless sufficient altitude is maintained to effect a safe emergency landing..." So in effect I can fly anywhere I have the equipment for with VFR. I don't have any range limitations nor Program letters to submit and no matter where I go, fly-ins, contests etc, I'm always practicing my skills to exhibit or race. "21.191 *(d) Exhibition. Exhibiting the aircraft's flight capabilities, performance, or unusual characteristics at air shows, motion picture, television, and similar productions, and the maintenance of exhibition flight proficiency, including (for persons exhibiting aircraft) flying to and from such air shows and productions. (e) Air racing. Participating in air races, including (for such participants) practicing for such air races and flying to and from racing events." Not very restrictive, although flying for hire is one restriction I can think of. The whole process is not nearly as big a deal as others are lead to believe and the people who have not gone through the process are unjustifiably paranoid about it, although there has surely been a case or two that has not gone as well, but that is probably the exception more than the rule. Also my inspection by the FAA *inspectors in 2010 took 20-30 minutes and cost $0 (They do not charge for C of A inspections) I think my C of A and OP Lims may have cost $5 if I recall correctly. You could also pay for a DAR to inspect if you are in a hurry and your FAA folks are very busy but you may only save a couple weeks as the DAR looses time having to send stuff in, while the FAA folks simply bring your paperwork to the inspection in person and sign it right there. On Dec 7, 11:39*am, wrote: On Dec 7, 11:48*am, gliderman wrote: I own 3 experimental - amatuer builts which I thoroughly enjoy. However the restrictions on them are no where near as restrictive as experimental - racing/exhibition. So I wonder if I "substantially modify" a certified glider (such as adding winglets or Schuemannizing,) might I be able to successfully argue that it belongs in the amatuer built category? Paul G Maybe if it looks like a homebuilt when done. Report back on your results. LOL UH- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think all you are telling us is that you worked with a helpful inspector at a reasonable FSDO. Not all inspectors at all FSDOs are quite to so easy to deal with. Here in the Phoenix area we seem to have the new broom sweeps clean set. Hopefully there will be better standardization when the new issue of the order comes into effect. What FSDO did you use? Maybe there will be a rush of glider owners to get their ops lims revised. Andy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12-7-2010 16:48, gliderman wrote:
I own 3 experimental - amatuer builts which I thoroughly enjoy. However the restrictions on them are no where near as restrictive as experimental - racing/exhibition. So I wonder if I "substantially modify" a certified glider (such as adding winglets or Schuemannizing,) might I be able to successfully argue that it belongs in the amatuer built category? Paul G Nope. There's that pesky 51% rule. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Folks,
As the thread originator, I appreciated and enjoyed all the comments and shared wisdom....thanks! After reading all the pros/cons I think for my needs and level of experience the right decision is to just leave everything "as is", not get too wrapped up chasing paperwork and doing a rug dance for the Feds but instead spend that time flying instead! Again, thanks for all the info. Rob ps-as to the canopy gas strut replacement, just did that on the ASW-19b I have. We used a 1000 newton strut (Eastern Sailplane's rec., I believe) on one that does NOT have the lift up panel...a 700 nm was on it and it lasted only about 4-5 years. We cut grooves in each end fitting of the strut, then compressed it and wrapped it several times with safety wire to hold it until we got it installed, then cut the wire. It sure did feel like I was holding a safety-wired live cobra until I got that thing in place and the bolts and nuts back in! Hope the higher rated strut lasts as long as I fly this thing! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Standard D25 - New Standard D25 sun n fun 2010 (Custom).jpg | Glen in Orlando | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 22nd 10 11:49 PM |
experimental to standard certificate | shkdriver | Soaring | 20 | January 19th 10 09:25 AM |
Converting a glider from Experiemental to Standard Airworthiness | Peter[_1_] | Soaring | 2 | November 15th 09 06:20 AM |
Converting GPS info | [email protected] | Piloting | 9 | March 14th 06 01:36 AM |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |