A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Transponder for us



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 9th 10, 02:59 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default New Transponder for us

On 12/8/2010 4:51 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote:
However that does
*not* get close to explaining the apparent high power consumption
(1.1 Amp!!) of this Mode C transponder vs. the Trig Mode S
transponder.


According to the brochure I downloaded, the remote version of the unit
only requires 200 ma, instead of 500 (still at 28 volts). That's still
pretty high for a version without the encoder, but it makes me wonder
where the 300 ma is going.

Someone could call the company to find out, but really, I see little
value in it when the Trig is so good. If you want to save some money,
offer to buy a used Becker for, say, $1000-$1200, and get one from
someone that's thinking of upgrading to a Trig.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
  #2  
Old December 9th 10, 03:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Grider Pirate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 238
Default New Transponder for us

Someone could call the company to find out, but really, I see little
value in it when the Trig is so good. If you want to save some money,
offer to buy a used Becker for, say, $1000-$1200, and get one from
someone that's thinking of upgrading to a Trig.

I'm just waiting for Trig to produce a transceiver too.
  #3  
Old December 9th 10, 03:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Darryl Ramm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,403
Default New Transponder for us

On Dec 8, 6:59*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On 12/8/2010 4:51 PM, Darryl Ramm wrote:

However that does
*not* get close to explaining the apparent high power consumption
(1.1 Amp!!) of this Mode C transponder vs. the Trig Mode S
transponder.


According to the brochure I downloaded, the remote version of the unit
only requires 200 ma, instead of 500 (still at 28 volts). That's still
pretty high for a version without the encoder, but it makes me wonder
where the 300 ma is going.

Someone could call the company to find out, but really, I see little
value in it when the Trig is so good. If you want to save some money,
offer to buy a used Becker for, say, $1000-$1200, and get one from
someone that's thinking of upgrading to a Trig.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)


Either Sandia is quoting numbers for an encoder with heater full on
(unusual to do so), or they have an inefficient encoder design or
their control head draws a surprising large amount of power (for
something with an OLED display), or some combination of all of that.

A good rough number for steady state consumption for an ACK-30 encoder
(what most of us with Mode C transponders in gliders use today) is a
bit over 60mA @ 12VDC without the heater on. Heater full on they can
draw 400mA @ 12VDC (luckily the heater should not be on often in
usual use - but if you are flying in wave especially make sure the
encoder box is insulated and protected from drafts).

But even then even if you were compete nuts and wanted to spend money
on a Mode C transponder today the headless version of this transponder
is still not an option until somebody has a controller that can
control it.

BTW the heater in the encoder built into the Trig TT21/22 kicks in
starting at 4C down to -25C where it is full on. At its peak it
consumes 1.7 Watts (= 140mA @ 12VDC). Very impressive numbers. Data is
from Trig engineering.

I have a pair of very nice electrical heated boot insoles that I
brought for wave flying and they consume almost the same as the spec
on this Sandia transponder implies it does at 12VDC. Possible since I
have 2 x 18Ah batteries, a engine driven generator, and a large solar
panel in my motor glider... but still if I'm going to just absolutely
burn power for the hell of it its going to be for important stuff like
keeping my feet warm not to run this junk.

Darryl
  #4  
Old December 9th 10, 04:13 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike Ash
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 299
Default New Transponder for us

In article
,
Darryl Ramm wrote:

A good rough number for steady state consumption for an ACK-30 encoder
(what most of us with Mode C transponders in gliders use today) is a
bit over 60mA @ 12VDC without the heater on. Heater full on they can
draw 400mA @ 12VDC (luckily the heater should not be on often in
usual use - but if you are flying in wave especially make sure the
encoder box is insulated and protected from drafts).


Pardon me for hijacking the thread, but this suddenly made me realize
that I've been wondering about these encoders for a while.

This is probably obvious to those in the know, but alas, it's not coming
to me. Why is it that a transponder encoder requires a heater, when a
mechanical altimeter functions just fine on its own?

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transponder vs. Portable Transponder Detectors John Murphy Soaring 16 December 20th 08 07:25 AM
transponder LJ Blodgett Home Built 4 March 19th 07 05:22 PM
TRANSPONDER LJ Blodgett Home Built 5 January 8th 07 06:50 PM
wtb transponder LJ Aviation Marketplace 0 September 7th 06 05:05 PM
Which Transponder? Danl Johnson Soaring 10 October 29th 04 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.