![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:04:12 +0000, Doug Greenwell wrote:
At 02:48 05 January 2011, bildan wrote: On Jan 4, 7:13=A0pm, AGL wrote: Has anyone tried some flaps in an integrated flap machine (which reduces stall speed) to see if the wallowing goes away? With every flapped glider I've flown, negative flap improves aileron response fairly dramatically. Positive flap does lower the stall speed a little. I've flown a 20 meter Nimbus 2C ballasted to 11 lbs/sq ft wing loading behind a tug pilot accustomed to towing 2-33's. The speed was low enough to need +1 flap but it didn't wallow. The tug pilot turned off his radio when he got tired of me yelling for more speed than what he "knew" was right. Sorry if this is an obvious question (never flown a flapped glider), but with an integrated flap system what is the relative movement of the ailerons and flaps? Presumably the ailerons don't move at all for negative settings? On an ASW-20 flaps and ailerons move together so the trailing edge remains straight with the stick central in the flying flap settings: +8 (thermal) through -9 (max negative flap). When stick is moved laterally the flap deflects half as far as the aileron. In landing flap settings the ailerons mover to -8 degrees - what the RC glider guys call 'crow mode'. This reduces tip stalling tendencies and the handbook says this also increases drag. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 13:09 05 January 2011, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 09:04:12 +0000, Doug Greenwell wrote: At 02:48 05 January 2011, bildan wrote: On Jan 4, 7:13=A0pm, AGL wrote: Has anyone tried some flaps in an integrated flap machine (which reduces stall speed) to see if the wallowing goes away? With every flapped glider I've flown, negative flap improves aileron response fairly dramatically. Positive flap does lower the stall speed a little. I've flown a 20 meter Nimbus 2C ballasted to 11 lbs/sq ft wing loading behind a tug pilot accustomed to towing 2-33's. The speed was low enough to need +1 flap but it didn't wallow. The tug pilot turned off his radio when he got tired of me yelling for more speed than what he "knew" was right. Sorry if this is an obvious question (never flown a flapped glider), but with an integrated flap system what is the relative movement of the ailerons and flaps? Presumably the ailerons don't move at all for negative settings? On an ASW-20 flaps and ailerons move together so the trailing edge remains straight with the stick central in the flying flap settings: +8 (thermal) through -9 (max negative flap). When stick is moved laterally the flap deflects half as far as the aileron. In landing flap settings the ailerons mover to -8 degrees - what the RC glider guys call 'crow mode'. This reduces tip stalling tendencies and the handbook says this also increases drag. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | Ok - so that would help in reducing stall speed slightly, but would not help with the spanwise lift distribution. Is the aileron/flap interconnect a standard arrangement, or are there flapped gliders without it? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/5/2011 7:11 AM, Doug Greenwell wrote:
Is the aileron/flap interconnect a standard arrangement... Kinda-sorta, "Yes, but..." or are there flapped gliders without it? ....because the answer to this question is also (if unequivocally so), "Yes." (I've owned 3.) Regards, Bob W. P.S. Very e-e-enteresting discussion with (apparently ![]() clarify some folks' understanding of things. I remain in the F = Ma camp! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 17:59 05 January 2011, Bob Whelan wrote:
On 1/5/2011 7:11 AM, Doug Greenwell wrote: Is the aileron/flap interconnect a standard arrangement... Kinda-sorta, "Yes, but..." or are there flapped gliders without it? ....because the answer to this question is also (if unequivocally so), "Yes." (I've owned 3.) Regards, Bob W. P.S. Very e-e-enteresting discussion with (apparently ![]() to clarify some folks' understanding of things. I remain in the F = Ma camp! Thanks - so the question of whether flaps make things better or worse on tow is also going to be 'it depends' ... :-) It's certainly been unexpectedly interesting - having only recently returned to gliding I'm having a load of fun improving my flying, but also a load of fun trying to understand what is happening from an academic/technical point of view. You can't argue with F=ma ... but which 'F' and which 'a' and what direction they are in is another matter! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ok - so that would help in reducing stall speed slightly, but would not help with the spanwise lift distribution. Is the aileron/flap interconnect a standard arrangement, or are there flapped gliders without it? It's optional on a 1-35. (some have it, some don't) but I'm not sure about the others. Those who have flown both don't report much difference. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
another poor man's car engine conversion | jan olieslagers[_2_] | Home Built | 19 | February 22nd 09 03:49 PM |
Poor readability | Kees Mies | Owning | 2 | August 14th 04 04:22 AM |
Poor Guy | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 6 | July 17th 04 06:45 PM |
I'm grateful for poor people who are willing to murder & die | Krztalizer | Military Aviation | 0 | April 20th 04 11:11 PM |
Concorde in FS2002: No lateral views | A. Bomanns | Simulators | 3 | July 19th 03 11:33 AM |