A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

poor lateral control on a slow tow?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 6th 11, 02:20 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andreas Maurer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 345
Default poor lateral control on a slow tow?

On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:09:39 -0800 (PST), Derek C
wrote:

Hi Derek,


The two most scary aerotows I have ever had we

1) 2 up in a K13 behind a Rotax engined Falke at about 50 knots
indicated airspeed


Well... 50 kts is pretty slow...

2) 2 up in a K13 behind a 150hp Piper Cub when we visited another
site. This tug wasn't very powerful anyway and its pilot seemed to be
trying to demonstrate how slowly he could fly. Indicated airspeed
slightly under 50 knots.


Clear case: Low aspect ratio, wing loading twice of the ASK-13. How
much above the stall speed of the Cub? 10 kts at maximum? Scary...

I guess you had a word with the tow pilot afterwards.

In both cases the glider wallowed about and it seemed very difficult
to keep above the wake turbulence/prop wash.


Yes, the typical situation for a very slow aerotow.


I have not been towed by a Dimona or Katana, but they seem to be a bit
faster than the above, so may not give the same problems. I think the
problem is more lack of airspeed than the type of the tug aircraft.


Well, I guess we both agree that this problem only manifests itself at
the low-speed area of the envelope, don't we?

The general consensus here in Germany (as well as my own experience)
is that an aerotow behind a motorglider is *much* easier to control
despite the fact that it takes place at 110-115 kph (60-63 kts)
instead of the 130-140 kph (70-75 kts) that are typical for Morane MS
893 and Robin Remorqeur.
Of course similar wing loadings result in similar reactions to gusts,
which helps to follow the tow plane.


Regards
Andreas
  #2  
Old January 6th 11, 03:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Derek C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 114
Default poor lateral control on a slow tow?

On Jan 6, 2:20*am, Andreas Maurer wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:09:39 -0800 (PST), Derek C

wrote:

Hi Derek,

The two most scary aerotows I have ever had we


1) 2 up in a K13 behind a Rotax engined Falke at about 50 knots
indicated airspeed


Well... 50 kts is pretty slow...

2) 2 up in a K13 behind a 150hp Piper Cub when we visited another
site. This tug wasn't very powerful anyway and its pilot seemed to be
trying to demonstrate how slowly he could fly. Indicated airspeed
slightly under 50 knots.


Clear case: Low aspect ratio, wing loading twice of the ASK-13. How
much above the stall speed of the Cub? 10 kts at maximum? Scary...

I guess you had a word with the tow pilot afterwards.

In both cases the glider wallowed about and it seemed very difficult
to keep above the wake turbulence/prop wash.


Yes, the typical situation for a very slow aerotow.

I have not been towed by a Dimona or Katana, but they seem to be a bit
faster than the above, so may not give the same problems. I think the
problem is more lack of airspeed than the type of the tug aircraft.


Well, I guess we both agree that this problem only manifests itself at
the low-speed area of the envelope, don't we?

The general consensus here in Germany (as well as my own experience)
is that an aerotow behind a motorglider is *much* easier to control
despite the fact that it takes place at 110-115 kph (60-63 kts)
instead of the 130-140 kph (70-75 kts) *that are typical for Morane MS
893 and Robin Remorqeur.
Of course similar wing loadings result in similar reactions to gusts,
which helps to follow the tow plane.

Regards
Andreas


Yes, but 50 knots (93kph) should be OK for a K13 when its stalling
speed in free flight is only about 36 knots (67kph). But it clearly
isn't! Therefore either the wing loading or the angle of attack (or
both) must be greater during an aerotow than in free flight.

Cheers,
Derek C
  #3  
Old January 6th 11, 08:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Doug Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default poor lateral control on a slow tow?

At 03:57 06 January 2011, Derek C wrote:
On Jan 6, 2:20=A0am, Andreas Maurer wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 15:09:39 -0800 (PST), Derek C

wrote:

Hi Derek,

The two most scary aerotows I have ever had we


1) 2 up in a K13 behind a Rotax engined Falke at about 50 knots
indicated airspeed


Well... 50 kts is pretty slow...

2) 2 up in a K13 behind a 150hp Piper Cub when we visited another
site. This tug wasn't very powerful anyway and its pilot seemed to

be
trying to demonstrate how slowly he could fly. Indicated airspeed
slightly under 50 knots.


Clear case: Low aspect ratio, wing loading twice of the ASK-13. How
much above the stall speed of the Cub? 10 kts at maximum? Scary...

I guess you had a word with the tow pilot afterwards.

In both cases the glider wallowed about and it seemed very difficult
to keep above the wake turbulence/prop wash.


Yes, the typical situation for a very slow aerotow.

I have not been towed by a Dimona or Katana, but they seem to be a

bit
faster than the above, so may not give the same problems. I think the
problem is more lack of airspeed than the type of the tug aircraft.


Well, I guess we both agree that this problem only manifests itself at
the low-speed area of the envelope, don't we?

The general consensus here in Germany (as well as my own experience)
is that an aerotow behind a motorglider is *much* easier to control
despite the fact that it takes place at 110-115 kph (60-63 kts)
instead of the 130-140 kph (70-75 kts) =A0that are typical for Morane

MS
893 and Robin Remorqeur.
Of course similar wing loadings result in similar reactions to gusts,
which helps to follow the tow plane.

Regards
Andreas


Yes, but 50 knots (93kph) should be OK for a K13 when its stalling
speed in free flight is only about 36 knots (67kph). But it clearly
isn't! Therefore either the wing loading or the angle of attack (or
both) must be greater during an aerotow than in free flight.

Cheers,
Derek C


... or the distribution of lift over the wing has changed ...

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
another poor man's car engine conversion jan olieslagers[_2_] Home Built 19 February 22nd 09 03:49 PM
Poor readability Kees Mies Owning 2 August 14th 04 04:22 AM
Poor Guy Bob Chilcoat Owning 6 July 17th 04 06:45 PM
I'm grateful for poor people who are willing to murder & die Krztalizer Military Aviation 0 April 20th 04 11:11 PM
Concorde in FS2002: No lateral views A. Bomanns Simulators 3 July 19th 03 11:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.