![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The std class version is the Pegasus, built in France."
That's not really true Eric. While the Pegasus fuselage is descended from the ASW-20, the wing is very different. Different planform and airfoil. In fact, there has only ever been one true standard class ASW-20, and that is the ship that I own. It's the ASW-24 prototype, SN24000. It was built from ASW-20B molds, but was modified to be a pure standard class ship. I don't have the use of flaps, but I have a very interesting dual aileron setup. The inboard ailerons end about 1.5 meters from the wing root, and they throw differently than the outboard. It's a lovely machine with a very fast roll rate. Next type you voyage to Ephrata you'll have to look me up and I can show it to you. As for it's performance, it will eat a Pegasus for lunch. Back to the topic. I've not flown the LS-6, but I do know they are world renowned for their handling and in my opinion it was the best of the 80's 15m ships. You won't be dissapointed with either one from a performance standpoint. I'd agree with the advice given so far. Find a version of each that you can sit in. This should have more influence than the other factors. You need to fit! Minor comfort issues can be addressed with trial and error and pillows and cushions. If you fit comfortably in both, pick the one with the best instruments and trailer. I'm 6'3 and fit wonderfully in the 20. There is something real nice about having a little extra shoulder room! -Kevin |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 31, 1:28*am, KevinFinke wrote:
"The std class version is the Pegasus, built in France." That's not really true Eric. While the Pegasus fuselage is descended from the ASW-20, the wing is very different. Different planform and airfoil. *In fact, there has only ever been one true standard class ASW-20, and that is the ship that I own. It's the ASW-24 prototype, SN24000. It was built from ASW-20B molds, but was modified to be a pure standard class ship. I don't have the use of flaps, but I have a very interesting dual aileron setup. The inboard ailerons end about 1.5 meters from the wing root, and they throw differently than the outboard. It's a lovely machine with a very fast roll rate. Next type you voyage to Ephrata you'll have to look me up and I can show it to you. As for it's performance, it will eat a Pegasus for lunch. Back to the topic. I've not flown the LS-6, but I do know they are world renowned for their handling and in my opinion it was the best of the 80's 15m ships. You won't be dissapointed with either one from a performance standpoint. I'd agree with the advice given so far. Find a version of each that you can sit in. This should have more influence than the other factors. You need to fit! Minor comfort issues can be addressed with trial and error and pillows and cushions. If you fit comfortably in both, pick the one with the best instruments and trailer. I'm 6'3 and fit wonderfully in the 20. There is something real nice about having a little extra shoulder room! -Kevin Thanks for all the information, it has been a great help. I do plan to sit in both before I make a decision I did not mention that the ASW20 is the "B" model and has had the wings refinished about 8 years ago. They only re-gelcoated the top side and not the bottom side. the bottom side does have some gelcoat cracking. I have not seen it yet to determine the condition of the cracks. I do know that winglets were custom added at the same time that the wings were refinished by the same company that did the refinishing. From my conversations with the current owner of the LS6 the wings have been entirely regel coated a few years back (not sure how long ago) but he does say that the gelcoat is in excellent condition. Also it is the LS6A model. Both gliders have Cobra trailers that appear to be in excellant condition |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 30, 11:28*pm, KevinFinke wrote:
*In fact, there has only ever been one true standard class ASW-20, and that is the ship that I own. It's the ASW-24 prototype, SN24000. It was built from ASW-20B molds, but was modified to be a pure standard class ship. That glider was based at El Tiro, AZ, for a while. When the owner told me it was an ASW-24 I wondered what he had been smoking until he told be the history. Andy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/30/2011 10:28 PM, KevinFinke wrote:
"The std class version is the Pegasus, built in France." That's not really true Eric. While the Pegasus fuselage is descended from the ASW-20, the wing is very different. Different planform and airfoil. In fact, there has only ever been one true standard class ASW-20, and that is the ship that I own. It's the ASW-24 prototype, SN24000. It was built from ASW-20B molds, but was modified to be a pure standard class ship. I don't have the use of flaps, but I have a very interesting dual aileron setup. The inboard ailerons end about 1.5 meters from the wing root, and they throw differently than the outboard. It's a lovely machine with a very fast roll rate. Next type you voyage to Ephrata you'll have to look me up and I can show it to you. As for it's performance, it will eat a Pegasus for lunch. You are correct, the Pegasus is not an ASW 20 with the flaps glued to the wing. It does have the same wing area, bendiness, and the same planform (at least, it appears to be the same), so I'd call it at least a very close relative of the ASW 20. The one I flew felt just like my ASW 20. On the other hand, the ASW 19 and ASW 20 are very different gliders, and it is a mistake to use the 19 as a stand-in for the handling of the ASW 20. I'd love to look at SN2400 - that's new to me! -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:14:56 -0800, Eric Greenwell wrote:
On the other hand, the ASW 19 and ASW 20 are very different gliders, and it is a mistake to use the 19 as a stand-in for the handling of the ASW 20. However, if you're thinking of buying a 19, 20 or Pegase and want to try the cockpit for size before making the trip to see the glider, its worth remembering that all three cockpits are near as dammit identical. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ELT Mounting for an ASW20-C | Papa3 | Soaring | 11 | January 26th 06 06:37 AM |
ASW20 liftup panel mod ,do you want one | goneill | Soaring | 2 | September 8th 04 09:05 PM |
ASW20 owners | Andrew Henderson | Soaring | 0 | April 10th 04 12:28 PM |
Winglets for ASW20 | goneill | Soaring | 5 | February 3rd 04 01:21 AM |
3 view drawing of ASW20 | Kristoffer Raun | Soaring | 0 | January 3rd 04 01:43 AM |