![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tex Houston" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... That might have been a more applicable reason behind the larger warheads you found in the SAM's like Bomarc and Nike Hercules, but not in the case of the Genie, or especially in the case of the meager warhead yield of the nuclear Falcon. Genie had an assured destruction radius of something like 300 meters, IIRC--not likely to get a lot of aircraft that way, though it does kind of make it hard for the single aircraft you are shooting at to evade it (and as it was unguided, no countermeasures could be effective against it). Falcon only had around one-sixth the yield of Genie. People could (and did) stand under a Genie explosion. Your post reminded of the July 19, 1957 test where just that thing happened. The publicity shot arranged by Colonel Barney Oldfield was famous at the time. I tried to find the best site on the web for a description but it appears to no longer be there, just mentions of it. The photos are in the latter of the two sites you provided links to--go to "military", then the "Korea-NORAD" pages--you have to click on the rather fancy righthand arrowpoints to page through the section, but you will eventually get to them. Brooks On a sadder note I just found out my friend Barney died within the last few months. See http://nebraska.statepaper.com/vnews.../3fe1a44fa2747 or http://www.oldfields.org/ . Regards, Tex Houston |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I was wondering | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 2 | August 6th 03 04:38 AM |