![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 19:43 10 March 2011, Bob Whelan wrote:
On 3/10/2011 5:53 AM, Dave Stewart wrote: Apart from the ergonomics I would think it's historical. People wore a sword on their left so mounted a horse from the left to prevent it fouling. They rode on the left as it was easier to fight someone on their right side. When it came to cars people mounted from the left to stay out of the road. The chauffeur would get in from the other side hence R/H drive cars. I've always guessed 'the sword (and horse/critter) thing' originated from there being more natural righties than lefties. (Try drawing your sword with your right hand from your right side; I've no doubt someone on the web sells swords if you don't have one handy...) On the other hand, American Plains Indians (so I've read) tended to mount their horses from the right side, but since that history was written mostly by white guys, it may be suspect! I'd contend there's something sinister about all this, but few would get the weird humor (ha ha)... Which raises the question "why is America the opposite? Henry Ford. He (sensibly, it can be argued) decided to put the driver on the left side of the Model T because it was 'generally the custom' over here with horse-drawn carriages to pass on the right of oncoming carriages, and (presumably) it followed that ladies typically entered carriages from the right side. What I've read (attributions entirely forgotten) claimed Ford decided to continue the lady-entrance-tradition (think 'horseless carriage,' long dresses, dirt 'roads,' and few sidewalks outside of cities' downtowns), as both likely - insofar as the ladies would be concerned (many of whom would have to be convinced that spending money on the newfangled contraption for 'everyman' was in the house budget) - to be cleaner (in the event of sidewalks) and safer (in the event of passing traffic). I also think it used to be considered unlucky to mount from the right! Dave Never read that one! I generally entered my Zuni (think ~6-foot-long removeable canopy; 'AS W-12-like' landing gear) from the low side. At camps with ramps, right-side preferred because nothing projects above the side rail; at my home field, operations favor the left side, which requires getting legs/butt over ~6" of projecting flap handle. Bob W. This is mainly historical, as canopies primarily hinged on the right. Most people put GPS, etc on the right so all of the erroneous equipment is on the right, such that in the event of a bail out you don’t have to fight your way over all of the rubbish. Any equipment that is removed from the cockpit is a bonus as it frees up the exit route. I can give you an example of someone having to climb over the GPS stick on mount to bail out in the 20 seconds before it hit the ground, he won’t mount it there again. Flying is about good habits, so putting all of the excess equipment in the same place is a good practice. Panel mounts are now fitted to a lot of new gliders in Europe and are very good, with no issues to report. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wireless head mounted microphones | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 5 | December 8th 05 03:33 PM |
Goose Neck Microphones For Sale | Guy Byars | Soaring | 1 | September 19th 05 06:01 PM |