A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

About German Mystery Objects



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 16th 04, 01:34 PM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Erich Adler" wrote in message
om...


U-boats carried technicians and scientists to a base there, Number
211, via an undersea trench that stretched the entire way through what
was know formerly as Queen Maud Land. Base 211 was carved into a cave
complex similar to Nordhausen and supplied by transport subs,
components of which even the Type XXVI were taken. SS Antartic troops
maintained the base.


So what was the labour force used to construct this base in the Antarctic ?

Nordhausen required the efforts of 10's of thousands of slave laborers.
Who did they refind to recruit in the Antarctic , trained penguins perhaps ?


The question is: why not use the discs in battle then? The answer was
that they could fly at only certain angles eliminating them as
fighters. Their engines operation killed any normal magnetic compass.
They had no armament fitted except a few experimentals with 2 MGs, a
30mm MK 108, and a Haunebu with some form of turret gun. This has
mistakenly been called a hoax with a panzer 38t turret and gun. If you
examine highly cleaned-up versions of the photos and note the scale
the turret is rounded and not exactly metal. The gun defies comparison
to conventional weapons of the time.


As it didnt exist except in the fevered imaginations of a number
of deranged individuals comparing to anything real would be
a trfile difficult

deranged ramblings snipped

People in South America believe the Nazis still have bases there and
in Antartica. Some people in Germany believe that too. It sounds wild
yet there is so much information circulating.

Anyone care to add to this conversation?


Yep , you are a grade A loon



Keith


  #2  
Old February 16th 04, 03:04 PM
Bill and Susan Maddux
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Germany lost that is the point here. IT would not have mattered if they had
had mach 2 aircraft, they still would have lost. The Nazi Panzer units had
better tougher tanks, but they could not defeat the out numbering allied
tank force. Sure the Sherman tanks were weaker in armor and armament, but
they out numbered the panzers. Same thing in the air, and after the
successes of the air campaign, Germany had no combat trained pilots any
more. the last days of the third Reich was filled with doubt and indecisions
by a madman who couldn't trust his own generals to get the job done. like
the roman empire and napoleon, they simply outreached their empire. and
could not defend it anymore.

Of course this is my view, and you can disagree with it anyway you choose.

Bill Maddog Maddux



  #3  
Old February 16th 04, 03:02 PM
walt moffett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:34:14 -0000,
Keith Willshaw wrote:

"Erich Adler" wrote in message
om...


U-boats carried technicians and scientists to a base there, Number
211, via an undersea trench that stretched the entire way through what
was know formerly as Queen Maud Land. Base 211 was carved into a cave
complex similar to Nordhausen and supplied by transport subs,
components of which even the Type XXVI were taken. SS Antartic troops
maintained the base.


So what was the labour force used to construct this base in the Antarctic ?


Shoggoths




  #4  
Old February 16th 04, 08:00 PM
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
walt moffett wrote:

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:34:14 -0000,
Keith Willshaw wrote:

"Erich Adler" wrote in message
om...


U-boats carried technicians and scientists to a base there, Number
211, via an undersea trench that stretched the entire way through what
was know formerly as Queen Maud Land. Base 211 was carved into a cave
complex similar to Nordhausen and supplied by transport subs,
components of which even the Type XXVI were taken. SS Antartic troops
maintained the base.


So what was the labour force used to construct this base in the Antarctic ?


Shoggoths


Ick. That means you have to deal with their union, too.
  #5  
Old February 16th 04, 03:27 PM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
walt moffett writes:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:34:14 -0000,
Keith Willshaw wrote:

"Erich Adler" wrote in message
om...


U-boats carried technicians and scientists to a base there, Number
211, via an undersea trench that stretched the entire way through what
was know formerly as Queen Maud Land. Base 211 was carved into a cave
complex similar to Nordhausen and supplied by transport subs,
components of which even the Type XXVI were taken. SS Antartic troops
maintained the base.


So what was the labour force used to construct this base in the Antarctic ?


Shoggoths


Using a map of the Boston Subway System.

--
Pete Stickney
Teki-Li-Li!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50% of NAZI oil was supplied from US Grantland Military Aviation 106 January 18th 14 07:58 PM
What if the germans... Charles Gray Military Aviation 119 January 26th 04 11:20 PM
China in space. Harley W. Daugherty Military Aviation 74 November 1st 03 06:26 PM
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII Mike Yared Military Aviation 4 October 30th 03 03:09 AM
German historian provokes row over war photos BackToNormal Military Aviation 21 October 24th 03 11:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.