Question about the F-22 and cost.

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...

You're getting more and more respectable all the time. Still just as
full of **** as ever though.

I was always respectable Ferrin, you have been a fool.

Uh huh. I guess some things still zip right over your head though
huh?

Scott, consider for a moment that you are not respectable, therefore you
have no connection whatsoever to my credibility.

I have already written that I will not oppose the production run any
longer,
(Georgia pork) so I don't see why you can't just discuss the numbers
issue
in a sober manner.

As far as the numbers go the more F-22s the merrier.

That is not the question. The issue is how many F-22s are necessary to have
a viable force.

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:32:42 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
.. .

You're getting more and more respectable all the time. Still just as
full of **** as ever though.

I was always respectable Ferrin, you have been a fool.

Uh huh. I guess some things still zip right over your head though
huh?

Scott, consider for a moment that you are not respectable, therefore you
have no connection whatsoever to my credibility

And I'm all weepy over here that you feel that way. And you'd need to
actually *have* credibility in order for anyone to be connected to it.






I have already written that I will not oppose the production run any
longer,
(Georgia pork) so I don't see why you can't just discuss the numbers
issue
in a sober manner.

As far as the numbers go the more F-22s the merrier.

That is not the question. The issue is how many F-22s are necessary to have
a viable force.

Depends what you want to do with it.

"Scott Ferrin" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:32:42 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:

That is not the question. The issue is how many F-22s are necessary to
have
a viable force.

Depends what you want to do with it.

That has become the major question WRT the F-22.