![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 19, 3:28*pm, Ben C wrote:
Is it standard practice to just reinstate the profile that the wing had prior to refinish? That's pretty much what you do. Make sure the wing profile is round in front, pointy in back, and the waviness is below .004", and it will probably be fine. ...Has anyone taken a profile from another aircraft to use, for example using a later LS6-c to reprofile an LS6-b? They're the same profile. Or at least the LS6-c left is the same as the LS6-b left, and likewise for the corresponding right wings. I've done template checks on several LS6 and a couple of LS8 to validate it. What about using an LS8 profile on an LS6, since they are supposed to be the same forward section? As you note, they're also pretty much the same, within the qualifications noted above. My advice: Don't bother trying to do a full profile job. The LS6 and LS8 go like stink, generally fly very straight, and handle very well. There is just about nothing a full profile job will do to change that. It will defnitely add a bunch of weight and expend hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. About the only things that would make much of a difference are the leading edge profile back to about 15% chord, and getting the waviness down to under .004". And my bet is that both of those are probably already in pretty good shape. Thanks, Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com/hp-24 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 19, 9:04*pm, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Jun 19, 3:28*pm, Ben C wrote: Is it standard practice to just reinstate the profile that the wing had prior to refinish? That's pretty much what you do. Make sure the wing profile is round in front, pointy in back, and the waviness is below .004", and it will probably be fine. ...Has anyone taken a profile from another aircraft to use, for example using a later LS6-c to reprofile an LS6-b? They're the same profile. Or at least the LS6-c left is the same as the LS6-b left, and likewise for the corresponding right wings. I've done template checks on several LS6 and a couple of LS8 to validate it. What about using an LS8 profile on an LS6, since they are supposed to be the same forward section? As you note, they're also pretty much the same, within the qualifications noted above. My advice: Don't bother trying to do a full profile job. The LS6 and LS8 go like stink, generally fly very straight, and handle very well. There is just about nothing a full profile job will do to change that. It will defnitely add a bunch of weight and expend hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. About the only things that would make much of a difference are the leading edge profile back to about 15% chord, and getting the waviness down to under .004". And my bet is that both of those are probably already in pretty good shape. Thanks, Bob K.http://www.hpaircraft.com/hp-24 Hi Bob, I am a newbie in the sport and wondering how much wing surface deformity would one expect to see in this era glass ships. The deformity is caused by shrinking/ settling of fiberglass through time or there is a different mechanism? The more recent ships with carbon fiber wings suffer just a much? BTW, I enjoy following your work. Thanks Khanh |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PC-9 with all the wings :-) | Glenn[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 1 | August 19th 07 01:52 AM |
X-Wings and Canard Rotor Wings. | Charles Gray | Rotorcraft | 1 | March 22nd 05 12:26 AM |
wings | mark | Owning | 18 | February 7th 04 10:07 AM |
FS: SGS 1-35 Wings | Michael | Soaring | 3 | December 14th 03 06:51 PM |
FS SGS 1-35 Wings | MHende6388 | Soaring | 0 | September 11th 03 02:06 AM |