A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

On the 'apron'?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 26th 11, 03:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default On the 'apron'?

Mike Rhodes wrote:

On the 'apron'?

Would the ATC specialist understand if I rejected his 'apron' and used
the ramp instead?


Yes.


Would the FAA administrator forcibly correct me
during certificate or ratings exams?


No.


The use of the word 'apron' is so odd as to consider it forcibly
queer.


Not at all.


  #2  
Old June 27th 11, 07:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mike Rhodes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default On the 'apron'?

On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:38:21 -0500, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:


The use of the word 'apron' is so odd as to consider it forcibly
queer.


Not at all.


Obviously it is. The word 'apron' has a singular public usage which
can only be transferred elsewhere by force; by the 'administrator.'
It certainly would not have been sought out and excepted by those who
normally use the ramp.

An apron, in its typical usage, does not in any way resemble that of a
ramp -- except by some vicious queer joke (preparing flesh for
cooking, or falling to the floor; typically by females in the home or
queers elsewhere). And only the very odd and evil would think it
either appropriate, or 'funny'. (All stated by me without ANY
exaggeration.)

Likewise is the use of 'zulu' time. I will never use Z for time,
(except for the time of their burning that is coming!) It is another
word for 'coordinated universal time', which is actually 'manipulated
emperialistic time'. It is manipulated specifically for the sake of
Zulus, and also those who subversivally hide behind those troublesome
worthless pathetic pests, including their queers who inflict those
@#$% on productive, peaceful societies. (All stated by me without ANY
exaggeration.)

Use 'zinc' for z in the phonetic alphabet, or something else more
universally civil then the damned 'zulu'.
--
Michael

  #3  
Old June 28th 11, 01:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default On the 'apron'?

Mike Rhodes wrote:

Obviously it is.


Not at all.


The word 'apron' has a singular public usage which
can only be transferred elsewhere by force; by the 'administrator.'
It certainly would not have been sought out and excepted by those who
normally use the ramp.

An apron, in its typical usage, does not in any way resemble that of a
ramp -- except by some vicious queer joke (preparing flesh for
cooking, or falling to the floor; typically by females in the home or
queers elsewhere). And only the very odd and evil would think it
either appropriate, or 'funny'. (All stated by me without ANY
exaggeration.)

Likewise is the use of 'zulu' time. I will never use Z for time,
(except for the time of their burning that is coming!) It is another
word for 'coordinated universal time', which is actually 'manipulated
emperialistic time'. It is manipulated specifically for the sake of
Zulus, and also those who subversivally hide behind those troublesome
worthless pathetic pests, including their queers who inflict those
@#$% on productive, peaceful societies. (All stated by me without ANY
exaggeration.)

Use 'zinc' for z in the phonetic alphabet, or something else more
universally civil then the damned 'zulu'.


You are mistaken.


  #4  
Old June 28th 11, 03:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mike Rhodes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11
Default On the 'apron'?

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:41:04 -0500, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:



You are mistaken.


That's it? No follow-up discussion? That is both arrogant and
cowardly, probably because you have an indefensible position. Also,
do you wish to infer such an attitude on pilots generally? I suspect
so.
--
Michael
  #5  
Old June 28th 11, 02:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default On the 'apron'?

Mike Rhodes wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:41:04 -0500, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:



You are mistaken.


That's it? No follow-up discussion? That is both arrogant and
cowardly, probably because you have an indefensible position. Also,
do you wish to infer such an attitude on pilots generally? I suspect
so.


Your previous messages indicate you lack the intelligence to understand
further discussion of thim matter.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.