A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Germany invented it. We shot it down



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 21st 04, 10:04 AM
M. H. Greaves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

They may not have used pure aryan blood for these missions, but they did
have many fanatics from the western U.S.S.R. i'm sure they would have been
willing!
"Eunometic" wrote in message
om...
(B2431) wrote in message

...
From: "Keith Willshaw"

Date: 2/19/2004 10:21 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Nuff said.



Or bombed it

Keith


Or laughed at it after the war. They really should have mass produced

the
piloted version of the V-1. Just think, we could have killed more pilots

that
way, the Nazis would have wasted money and material and, most

imporantly, put
them in the air flying a straight line and making an easy target.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired



The Reichenberg was a effectively a near suicide weapon but the
Germans did take care that it wasn't a forgone conclusion. Unlike the
Japanese Baka in which the pilot was sealed in his cockpit it did have
an escape system: parachute, terminal autopilot and a two seat two
cockit versions were made to train pilots presumably with a simulated
escape.

The As 014 pulse jet was continiously tweeked to improve its speed.
With a slightly lightend warload (like the latter buzz bombs) and the
tweeked engines which had shown themselves to work at 495mph I expect
a speed of 495mph would have been possible or at least necessary for
the Reichberg to work. Enough to evade interception. Dodging radar
directed guns with proximity fuses might have been more difficult but
even there the weapon would have been capable of some degree of
weaving. Still such a weapon if it can be made survivable enough for
say a 33% or more hit rate and the targets are chosen carefully IT is
a mathematically sensible use of resources if it destroys and kills
more than it costs. Me 109s in the last stages of the war had an
attrition rate of 30%. It takes balls to get in the air in that
situation and in some ways their missions would have been almost more
pointless than a suicide mission.

If it ever got down to the wire do you think the allies would be
capable of producing the men for this kind of mission? Sure WWII
aircrew had around the 50% chance of completing a tour of duty (about
the same as Ed Rasimus had flying thuds over Vietnam). but to face
odds like that or like 95% on a single mission? Today I don't you
could find such people.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hey, Germany Invented It... Face It Erich Adler Military Aviation 51 February 20th 04 05:39 PM
China in space. Harley W. Daugherty Military Aviation 74 November 1st 03 06:26 PM
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future Jack White Military Aviation 71 September 21st 03 02:58 PM
Russia joins France and Germany captain! Military Aviation 12 September 9th 03 09:56 AM
Chirac lost JD Military Aviation 7 July 26th 03 06:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.