![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Feb 2004 18:21:37 GMT, "Emmanuel.Gustin"
wrote: Isn't that army policy? I seem to remember reading that the US Army is deliberately organized in such way that any major conflict requires calling in the National Guard. In part because this allows the professional regular troops to concentrate on the more hich-tech tasks, and in part to create a political hurdle the politicians have to jump over first. Sending National Guard units into combat requires a clear commitment, so this prevents the army from being slowly dragged into a full-scale war -- no more Vietnams. Yes, that is exactly the case. It's also an economy measure. Not every military engagement requires a civil affairs or a bridge-building unit, for example. So why not train reservists or Guards in those offbeat specialties? all the best -- Dan Ford email: (requires authentication) see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
GWB and the Air Guard | JD | Military Aviation | 77 | March 17th 04 10:52 AM |
Colin Powell on National Guard | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 12 | February 23rd 04 01:26 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |