![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 12, 7:07*am, Stefan wrote:
Am 12.09.11 14:57, schrieb jcarlyle: Using the same logic, don't buy anything other than V rated tires for your car, as the common S rating is only good for 112 mph (180 kph). If I wanted to drive with 112 mph (180 kph), then you'd be perfectly correct. Glider pilots on the other hand tend to want to climb as high as they can. In fact, the possibility to get a clearance to climb has been the main reason for me to buy a transponder. So it would have been pretty pointless to buy a class 2 transponder. As always YMMV, but at least one should be aware of this limitation before spending money on a class 2 transponder. Except for the fact that the folks on the ground that grant the clearance don't know or care whether you've a Class 1 or Class 2 transmitter as long as they are receiving your signal. They also don't care about you when you are more than 40 miles out, and if 135 watts won't get you 40 miles, something's wrong with your installation. A properly installed* Class 2 with a dipole antenna in a fiberglass (not carbon) fuselage glider will get more radiated power out than most GA with metal fuselages and the 1/4 wave monopole antenna they are forced to use. If you've got a carbon fuselage, you're stuck with the 1/4 wave. * a major contributor to lost outpout power is the cable from the transceiver to the antenna. Don't use RG-58. It's unsuitable for L- band. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jim wynhoff wrote:
Except for the fact that the folks on the ground that grant the clearance don't know or care whether you've a Class 1 or Class 2 The price of a TT22 vs TT21 is about $2500 vs $2300 (approx.). This $200 to $300 gap isn't nearly big enough for me to even start to think about going the illegal route. As always YMMV. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/12/2011 8:32 AM, John Smith wrote:
jim wynhoff wrote: Except for the fact that the folks on the ground that grant the clearance don't know or care whether you've a Class 1 or Class 2 The price of a TT22 vs TT21 is about $2500 vs $2300 (approx.). This $200 to $300 gap isn't nearly big enough for me to even start to think about going the illegal route. As always YMMV. What regulation makes it illegal for a glider to use the TT21 between 15,000 and 18,000'? Does it make a difference if the glider is licensed "Experimental"? Even if it is illegal, can we at least agree it is entirely suitable for it's intended purpose: providing ATC and TCAS a glider's position and altitude? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Morteza I have the Trig21. Installed myself in my experimental to replace a Terra250. Had no problem to get it signed-off at standard price at Precision Static in Livermore. Very happy with it. Reno sees it very well, even at 18k. No issue with the output power. When the PowerFlarm arrives, I suspect that suddenly there will be a miraculous unexplained wire in my harness. I guess that wire will be carrying 19200 baud NMEA sentences from the PowerFlarm to the Trig21 and the Trig will be squittering 1080ES ADS-B Out after someone accidentally toggled the setting in the setup menu to enable this feature. Of course I have nothing to do with this. I will stay legal. I got a good price from Tim M. Better then mentioned above. You can see my installation he https://sites.google.com/site/threeu...21-transponder Or you can have a look at my ship at Tahoe (or soon down the hill) 3U |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/12/11 6:43 PM, weersch wrote:
Hi Morteza I have the Trig21. Installed myself in my experimental to replace a Terra250. Had no problem to get it signed-off at standard price at Precision Static in Livermore. Very happy with it. Reno sees it very well, even at 18k. No issue with the output power. When the PowerFlarm arrives, I suspect that suddenly there will be a miraculous unexplained wire in my harness. I guess that wire will be carrying 19200 baud NMEA sentences from the PowerFlarm to the Trig21 and the Trig will be squittering 1080ES ADS-B Out after someone accidentally toggled the setting in the setup menu to enable this feature. Of course I have nothing to do with this. I will stay legal. I got a good price from Tim M. Better then mentioned above. You can see my installation he https://sites.google.com/site/threeu...21-transponder Or you can have a look at my ship at Tahoe (or soon down the hill) 3U OK I think you fall into the "technically competent" subcategory (even with the 1080ES typo) :-) Darryl |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks everyone for the feedback. I am convinced (again) that TT21 is
the best option. I will make sure I build the harness with the wires for the GPS input and ADS-B out just in case. I will order one along with the L2 antenna. I had great success with it in the previous installation and they are so easy to install pretty much anywhere. Now if I figure out what to do with the flight computer, I am all set for redoing the panel layout and getting to work ![]() Cheers, Morteza |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() OK I think you fall into the "technically competent" subcategory (even with the 1080ES typo) :-) Darryl Thanks Darryl for my induction in your hall of "technically competent". I feel honored. Yeah, doing too much 1080P work and not enough 1090ES. 3U |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Out of four different transponder and encoder combinations I've used
in gliders (Garmin/TransCal, Terra/Terra, 2x Becker/ACK, 2x Trig) the Trig has proven to have the least power consumption. The Trig is easy to install if you buy your own D-Sub connectors or a crimp tool for the included ones, or have someone with a crimp tool build the harness for you. The small Trig control panel may fit in a corner of the panel you thought unusable. RG58 antenna cable worked fine for me (even with a TNC to BNC adapter), but total cable length is less than 10' / 3m. For longer runs you'll do better with something lower loss. Joshua and Oakland have had no trouble getting radar contact with the Trigs. At the three avionics shops I called about Mode S, cost was the same to certify Mode C or S transponders. I believe the Trig takes less time if any adjustments are needed, but in my experience they haven't required adjustment. The altimeter is the most likely thing to require adjustment. And it's Scottish, so it can't be crap! Jim |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
What regulation makes it illegal for a glider to use the TT21 between 15,000 and 18,000'? Of course it's not illegal to turn on a class 2 transponder above 15,000 feet. But with a class 2 transponder, you can't tell ATC above 15,000 feet that you're transponder equipped, because legally, you're not. Where I fly, I pretty routinely enter protected airspace at that altitude, and I would hardly get a clearance without a transponder. This has been the main reason for me to buy a transponder, so buying class 2 transponder would have been pretty pointless. I don't care whether "they" would notice or not that I carry only a class 2 transponder. The price gap of a mere $200 is far too small to even consider to cheat. Of course all depends on where you fly and to whom you want to sell your glider later. So all I've wanted to say is that when you consider to buy a class 2 transponder, be aware of the limitation. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith wrote:
Eric Greenwell wrote: What regulation makes it illegal for a glider to use the TT21 between 15,000 and 18,000'? Of course it's not illegal to turn on a class 2 transponder above 15,000 feet. But with a class 2 transponder, you can't tell ATC above 15,000 feet that you're transponder equipped, Ah you want to show us a regulation or chain of regulations that says that? Which country are you flying in? You keep using the word legal and illegal etc. In the USA the FARs actually do not appear to place clear requirements in this area on the PIC. Show us the regulations please... And just for kicks 14CFR 91.215(c) "Transponder on operation" requires a pilot say who climbs above 15,000' with a class 2 transponder to keep operating that transponder. because legally, you're not. Where I fly, I pretty routinely enter protected airspace at that altitude, and I would hardly get a clearance without a transponder. This has been the main reason for me to buy a transponder, so buying class 2 transponder would have been pretty pointless. And buying class 2 would likely have made no difference to any if that. I don't care whether "they" would notice or not that I carry only a class 2 transponder. The price gap of a mere $200 is far too small to even consider to cheat. Of course all depends on where you fly and to whom you want to sell your glider later. So all I've wanted to say is that when you consider to buy a class 2 transponder, be aware of the limitation. and that's all fair but the more important thing is getting pilots in key high traffic areas to equip and use transponders (of any class or type)). And for most pilots in the USA it is not about clearances, it is about avoiding an encounter with an airliner or fast jet. Darryl |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wanted: Mode C Transponder | Robert[_6_] | Soaring | 3 | November 30th 10 05:20 AM |
Mode S transponder display to ATC? | paul kgyy | Instrument Flight Rules | 65 | September 29th 08 04:56 AM |
Garrecht Mode S transponder - USA? | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 3 | August 20th 07 09:05 PM |
New transponder mode S vs. mode C | Tom N. | Soaring | 39 | November 7th 06 07:40 AM |
WTB: Mode C Transponder | Chris Batcheller | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 21st 04 01:31 PM |