Disclosure Imminent? Eight + Underground NWO Bases Destroyed?

On Oct 8, 3:41*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there. Let's go together
with a camera to take pictures.

I mean they have to know this stuff somehow, so surely they have GPS
locations, pictures, etc. of these supposed secret bases.

Heck if we have satellite coordinates or GPS stuff Google Earth will
be our initial recon.

Please post GPS coordinates of these base complexes, we should be able
to see surface features or if collapsed a sunken area where the earth
or bunker caved in.

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:05:30 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

On Oct 8, 3:41*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there.

No they have made it very clear that their information is not onsite.
Read the article.

On Oct 8, 11:43*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 20:05:30 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:41 pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there will
be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason not
to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered years
later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there.

No they have made it very clear that their information is not onsite.
Read the article.

I did. My point being that unless there was an extreme radiation,
biological or chemical hazard, as the writer said there was not, even
my untrained self could go there with a camera and take some
pictures.

So the article asks people to buy some base in an undisclosed location
existed at one time, was destroyed in an unknown way, and there are no
people who have gone down because, well, worried over damage, which is
ridiculous as things like Nordhausen and other collapsed underground
base complexes have been entered over the years, in some cases decades
after they were collapsed.

It's a fancy tale with no proof posited by people who freak out when
asked for some. WIthout proof it is a waste of time.

Failing exact coordinates, is there a general area for these bases
that were known to exist and known to be destroyed with no proof of
existence or destruction given? We could search with publically
available satellite technology for traces of above ground structures
or caved in areas. In fact you sould want this more than I do because
you believe the story and are presumably attempting to convince
others.

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there.

No they have made it very clear that their information is not onsite.
Read the article.

I did.

Telling.

My point being that unless there was an extreme radiation, biological
or chemical hazard, as the writer said there was not, even my
untrained self could go there with a camera and take some pictures.

You're a liar. No, that's too harsh - perhaps you're just a waffling
moron who can't remember from one minute to the next what he wrote. Let
me refresh your addled memory; I'll quote verbatim what you wrote:

"Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base *surely they've been in there*"

Truth is simple. You moved the goalposts to cover either for the lie
that you read the article or the establishment that you fail to read
with the lowest level of comprehension.

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

So the article asks people to buy some base in an undisclosed location
existed at one time, was destroyed in an unknown way, and there are no
people who have gone down...

Partially correct, neither of the authors have visited the DUMBS there
is no statement that claims that no one has visited them.

because, well, worried over damage, which is ridiculous as things like
Nordhausen and other collapsed underground base complexes have been
entered over the years, in some cases decades after they were
collapsed.

Another lie. I doubt seriously you read the article at all or your
effort to disinform is elementary at best. Either way, this is nothing
more than an effort to be loved and liked by the denizens of these
newsgroups.

I just don't get your motivation. Look in the mirror. What is it in
your personality that makes you crave approval from total strangers?

It's a fancy tale with no proof posited by people who freak out when
asked for some. WIthout proof it is a waste of time.

That's your opinion.

On Oct 9, 5:47*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
So the article asks people to buy some base in an undisclosed location
existed at one time, was destroyed in an unknown way, and there are no
people who have gone down...

Partially correct, neither of the authors have visited the DUMBS there
is no statement that claims that no one has visited them.

OK in other words it is out of thin air BS and people are asked to
accept it with no proof. Thank you. The thread may safely be closed
now.

because, well, worried over damage, which is ridiculous as things like
Nordhausen and other collapsed underground base complexes have been
entered over the years, in some cases decades after they were
collapsed.

Another lie. I doubt seriously you read the article at all or your
effort to disinform is elementary at best. Either way, this is nothing
more than an effort to be loved and liked by the denizens of these
newsgroups.

Tunnels of Nordhausen reopened in the 1990s. Pics here. Stop
projecting.

http://www.thirdreichruins.com/mittelwerk.htm

I just don't get your motivation. *Look in the mirror. *What is it in
your personality that makes you crave approval from total strangers?

You are projecting again. I don't care what you think. You obviously
are looking to troll and worth no further attention.

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:04:38 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

On Oct 9, 5:47*pm, Tom wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
So the article asks people to buy some base in an undisclosed location
existed at one time, was destroyed in an unknown way, and there are no
people who have gone down...

Partially correct, neither of the authors have visited the DUMBS there
is no statement that claims that no one has visited them.

OK

snipped crap

Of course I snip your nonsense. Just because you've wandered into a
quagmire of inanities, irrelevances, and stupidities doesn't mean I
have to follow you in.

David E. Powell wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:41 pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there
will be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for
more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason
not to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered
years later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there. Let's go together
with a camera to take pictures.

I mean they have to know this stuff somehow, so surely they have GPS
locations, pictures, etc. of these supposed secret bases.

Heck if we have satellite coordinates or GPS stuff Google Earth will
be our initial recon.

Please post GPS coordinates of these base complexes, we should be able
to see surface features or if collapsed a sunken area where the earth
or bunker caved in.

Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming.

Keith

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year old girls to **** hard.

Keith

good god.
--
“Pâté is passé. Unicorn, the new white meat. An excellent source of
sparkles!�

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:43:31 -0400, Canned Unicorn wrote:

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year old girls to **** hard.

Keith

good god.

It appears that the rec.aviation groups are full of pedophiles and
homosexuals with perverse activities.