Disclosure Imminent? Eight + Underground NWO Bases Destroyed?

David E. Powell wrote:
On Oct 8, 3:41 pm, Tom wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 10:34:40 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:
UPDATED Wednesday 9/21. No radioactivity was found in either of the
bases. Method of attack still unknown. Damage is so extreme there
will be no effort to access them. Scroll to bottom of article for
more.

Given lack of radioactivity or extreme chem/bio hazard, no reason
not to try. Even the dynamited Nordhausen complex was re-entered
years later.

If you have the security clearance, let's get together and do so.

Let's get the people who wrote the story. As they gave details about
the inside of the base surely they've been in there. Let's go together
with a camera to take pictures.

I mean they have to know this stuff somehow, so surely they have GPS
locations, pictures, etc. of these supposed secret bases.

Heck if we have satellite coordinates or GPS stuff Google Earth will
be our initial recon.

Please post GPS coordinates of these base complexes, we should be able
to see surface features or if collapsed a sunken area where the earth
or bunker caved in.

Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming.

Keith

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year old girls to **** hard.

Keith

good god.
--
“Pâté is passé. Unicorn, the new white meat. An excellent source of
sparkles!�

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:43:31 -0400, Canned Unicorn wrote:

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year old girls to **** hard.

Keith

good god.

It appears that the rec.aviation groups are full of pedophiles and
homosexuals with perverse activities.

On 10/9/2011 3:47 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:43:31 -0400, Canned Unicorn wrote:

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year old girls to **** hard.

Keith

good god.

It appears that the rec.aviation groups are full of pedophiles and
homosexuals with perverse activities.

I suppose the childish tactic of altering someone's post entertains
the likes of you.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 16:38:55 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/9/2011 3:47 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:43:31 -0400, Canned Unicorn wrote:

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year old girls to **** hard.

Keith

good god.

It appears that the rec.aviation groups are full of pedophiles and
homosexuals with perverse activities.

I suppose my childish tactic of seeking kiddie butts on usenet entertains
the likes of you.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, child molester

They sur don't me.

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 17:50:17 -0400, Wrkitout wrote:

On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 16:38:55 -0500, Dan wrote:

On 10/9/2011 3:47 PM, Tom wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 16:43:31 -0400, Canned Unicorn wrote:

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:

Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year old girls to **** hard.

Keith

good god.

It appears that the rec.aviation groups are full of pedophiles and
homosexuals with perverse activities.

I suppose my childish tactic of seeking kiddie butts on usenet entertains
the likes of you.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, child molester

They sur don't me.

Do me a favor, don't quote this pervert. My killfile won't delete his
quoted posts.

On Oct 9, 4:43*pm, Canned Unicorn
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:
Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year

snip

Keith

good god.

Yes, it is appaling, appaling how people who claim to seriously
advance a fantastic and fanciful story with zero evidence presented to
back it up go so quick to spoofing and post doctoring efforts that
were passe on Usenet 15 years ago. It is a wondrous comment on the
credibility of their other stories and a tremendous indication of
their level of professionalism.

David E. Powell wrote:
On Oct 9, 4:43 pm, Canned Unicorn
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:
Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year

snip

Keith

good god.

Yes, it is appaling, appaling how people who claim to seriously
advance a fantastic and fanciful story with zero evidence presented to
back it up go so quick to spoofing and post doctoring efforts that
were passe on Usenet 15 years ago. It is a wondrous comment on the
credibility of their other stories and a tremendous indication of
their level of professionalism.

They are so dumb they assume nobody else

a) Can remember what was posted yesterday
b) Can use google groups

Keith

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:57:54 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

On Oct 9, 4:43*pm, Canned Unicorn
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:
Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year

snip

Keith

good god.

Yes, it is appaling, appaling how people who claim to seriously
advance a fantastic and fanciful story with zero evidence presented to
back it up go so quick to spoofing and post doctoring efforts that
were passe on Usenet 15 years ago. It is a wondrous comment on the
credibility of their other stories and a tremendous indication of
their level of professionalism.

Who is it that you are speaking?

On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:57:54 -0700 (PDT), David E. Powell wrote:

On Oct 9, 4:43*pm, Canned Unicorn
wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 10:49:32 +0100, Keith Willshaw wrote:
Wait for the excuses, no proof is ever forthcoming. In the meantime,
I'm going to hunt me down some 12 year

snip

Keith

good god.

Yes, it is appaling, appaling how people who claim to seriously
advance a fantastic and fanciful story with zero evidence presented to
back it up go so quick to spoofing and post doctoring efforts that
were passe on Usenet 15 years ago. It is a wondrous comment on the
credibility of their other stories and a tremendous indication of
their level of professionalism.

IF you were forged which you were not why would it matter? Usenet
reputation?

*bahahahahaha*