A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

General Aviation Dead?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 16th 11, 05:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Peter Skelton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default General Aviation Dead?

On 16/10/2011 11:14 AM, Mr. V wrote:
And let's not forget how the costs of defending against and paying
large judgments for liability insurance have so increased costs that
manufacturers of affordable planes have been either forced out of
business or are no longer able to produce an affordable, entry level
aircraft for GA.

Goodbye, Piper Cub.



Nice rant. Here's a bit of reality for you:

Private aircraft are only part of general aviation which, to
over-simplify like wikki, is everything unscheduled. To manufacturers of
aircraft, GA is larger because aircraft used for both scheduled and
unscheduled (like the King air or Otter) get lumped in.

the Cessena 150 cost $7K stripped in 1958, when it came out, comparable
aircraft today are around 140K. Both are roughly half the price of a
single detached house.

The piper cub went out of production in 1947.

--
Peter
  #2  
Old October 16th 11, 07:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Steve Hix[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default General Aviation Dead?

In article ,
Peter Skelton wrote:

On 16/10/2011 11:14 AM, Mr. V wrote:
And let's not forget how the costs of defending against and paying
large judgments for liability insurance have so increased costs that
manufacturers of affordable planes have been either forced out of
business or are no longer able to produce an affordable, entry level
aircraft for GA.

Goodbye, Piper Cub.



Nice rant. Here's a bit of reality for you:

Private aircraft are only part of general aviation which, to
over-simplify like wikki, is everything unscheduled. To manufacturers of
aircraft, GA is larger because aircraft used for both scheduled and
unscheduled (like the King air or Otter) get lumped in.

the Cessena 150 cost $7K stripped in 1958, when it came out, comparable
aircraft today are around 140K. Both are roughly half the price of a
single detached house.

The piper cub went out of production in 1947.


And it's back in production thanks to a couple different companies, such as
Cubcrafters, running about the price you mentioned above. In the case of
Cubcrafters, several versions, from basic Light Sport to pretty sporty Super Cub
types.
  #3  
Old October 16th 11, 08:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Aceâ™ 
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default General Aviation Dead?

On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:05:29 -0700, Steve Hix wrote:

In article ,
Peter Skelton wrote:

On 16/10/2011 11:14 AM, Mr. V wrote:
And let's not forget how the costs of defending against and paying
large judgments for liability insurance have so increased costs that
manufacturers of affordable planes have been either forced out of
business or are no longer able to produce an affordable, entry level
aircraft for GA.

Goodbye, Piper Cub.


Nice rant. Here's a bit of reality for you:

Private aircraft are only part of general aviation which, to
over-simplify like wikki, is everything unscheduled. To manufacturers of
aircraft, GA is larger because aircraft used for both scheduled and
unscheduled (like the King air or Otter) get lumped in.

the Cessena 150 cost $7K stripped in 1958, when it came out, comparable
aircraft today are around 140K. Both are roughly half the price of a
single detached house.

The piper cub went out of production in 1947.


And it's back in production thanks to a couple different companies, such as
Cubcrafters, running about the price you mentioned above. In the case of
Cubcrafters, several versions, from basic Light Sport to pretty sporty Super Cub
types.


I know all this. Mr. V is my sockpuppet so STFU.

I win.

Again.

A*
  #4  
Old October 16th 11, 10:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Peter Skelton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default General Aviation Dead?

On 16/10/2011 2:05 PM, Steve Hix wrote:
In ,
Peter wrote:

On 16/10/2011 11:14 AM, Mr. V wrote:
And let's not forget how the costs of defending against and paying
large judgments for liability insurance have so increased costs that
manufacturers of affordable planes have been either forced out of
business or are no longer able to produce an affordable, entry level
aircraft for GA.

Goodbye, Piper Cub.



Nice rant. Here's a bit of reality for you:

Private aircraft are only part of general aviation which, to
over-simplify like wikki, is everything unscheduled. To manufacturers of
aircraft, GA is larger because aircraft used for both scheduled and
unscheduled (like the King air or Otter) get lumped in.

the Cessena 150 cost $7K stripped in 1958, when it came out, comparable
aircraft today are around 140K. Both are roughly half the price of a
single detached house.

The piper cub went out of production in 1947.


And it's back in production thanks to a couple different companies, such as
Cubcrafters, running about the price you mentioned above. In the case of
Cubcrafters, several versions, from basic Light Sport to pretty sporty Super Cub
types.


The Cubcrafters stuff is Super Cub derivative and much updated, a fine
plane but with no commonality with the original cub.

--
Peter
  #5  
Old October 17th 11, 02:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Dan[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 451
Default General Aviation Dead?

On 10/16/2011 4:55 PM, Peter Skelton wrote:
On 16/10/2011 2:05 PM, Steve Hix wrote:
In ,
Peter wrote:

On 16/10/2011 11:14 AM, Mr. V wrote:
And let's not forget how the costs of defending against and paying
large judgments for liability insurance have so increased costs that
manufacturers of affordable planes have been either forced out of
business or are no longer able to produce an affordable, entry level
aircraft for GA.

Goodbye, Piper Cub.


Nice rant. Here's a bit of reality for you:

Private aircraft are only part of general aviation which, to
over-simplify like wikki, is everything unscheduled. To manufacturers of
aircraft, GA is larger because aircraft used for both scheduled and
unscheduled (like the King air or Otter) get lumped in.

the Cessena 150 cost $7K stripped in 1958, when it came out, comparable
aircraft today are around 140K. Both are roughly half the price of a
single detached house.

The piper cub went out of production in 1947.


And it's back in production thanks to a couple different companies,
such as
Cubcrafters, running about the price you mentioned above. In the case of
Cubcrafters, several versions, from basic Light Sport to pretty sporty
Super Cub
types.


The Cubcrafters stuff is Super Cub derivative and much updated, a fine
plane but with no commonality with the original cub.


Cub clones are also popular with home builders.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #6  
Old October 17th 11, 06:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Steve Hix[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default General Aviation Dead?

On 10/16/2011 4:55 PM, Peter Skelton wrote:

The Cubcrafters stuff is Super Cub derivative and much updated, a fine
plane but with no commonality with the original cub.


An homage, then, at the least.
  #7  
Old October 17th 11, 12:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Peter Skelton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default General Aviation Dead?

On 17/10/2011 1:41 AM, Steve Hix wrote:
On 10/16/2011 4:55 PM, Peter Skelton wrote:

The Cubcrafters stuff is Super Cub derivative and much updated, a fine
plane but with no commonality with the original cub.


An homage, then, at the least.


Deserved too.

--
Peter
  #8  
Old October 17th 11, 12:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Peter Skelton[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default General Aviation Dead?

On 16/10/2011 9:23 PM, Dan wrote:
On 10/16/2011 4:55 PM, Peter Skelton wrote:
On 16/10/2011 2:05 PM, Steve Hix wrote:
In ,
Peter wrote:

On 16/10/2011 11:14 AM, Mr. V wrote:
And let's not forget how the costs of defending against and paying
large judgments for liability insurance have so increased costs that
manufacturers of affordable planes have been either forced out of
business or are no longer able to produce an affordable, entry level
aircraft for GA.

Goodbye, Piper Cub.


Nice rant. Here's a bit of reality for you:

Private aircraft are only part of general aviation which, to
over-simplify like wikki, is everything unscheduled. To
manufacturers of
aircraft, GA is larger because aircraft used for both scheduled and
unscheduled (like the King air or Otter) get lumped in.

the Cessena 150 cost $7K stripped in 1958, when it came out, comparable
aircraft today are around 140K. Both are roughly half the price of a
single detached house.

The piper cub went out of production in 1947.

And it's back in production thanks to a couple different companies,
such as
Cubcrafters, running about the price you mentioned above. In the case of
Cubcrafters, several versions, from basic Light Sport to pretty sporty
Super Cub
types.


The Cubcrafters stuff is Super Cub derivative and much updated, a fine
plane but with no commonality with the original cub.


Cub clones are also popular with home builders.


Are you aware of any that aren't super cub based?


--
Peter
  #9  
Old October 17th 11, 03:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Dan[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 451
Default General Aviation Dead?

On 10/17/2011 6:04 AM, Peter Skelton wrote:
On 16/10/2011 9:23 PM, Dan wrote:
On 10/16/2011 4:55 PM, Peter Skelton wrote:
On 16/10/2011 2:05 PM, Steve Hix wrote:
In ,
Peter wrote:

On 16/10/2011 11:14 AM, Mr. V wrote:
And let's not forget how the costs of defending against and paying
large judgments for liability insurance have so increased costs that
manufacturers of affordable planes have been either forced out of
business or are no longer able to produce an affordable, entry level
aircraft for GA.

Goodbye, Piper Cub.


Nice rant. Here's a bit of reality for you:

Private aircraft are only part of general aviation which, to
over-simplify like wikki, is everything unscheduled. To
manufacturers of
aircraft, GA is larger because aircraft used for both scheduled and
unscheduled (like the King air or Otter) get lumped in.

the Cessena 150 cost $7K stripped in 1958, when it came out,
comparable
aircraft today are around 140K. Both are roughly half the price of a
single detached house.

The piper cub went out of production in 1947.

And it's back in production thanks to a couple different companies,
such as
Cubcrafters, running about the price you mentioned above. In the
case of
Cubcrafters, several versions, from basic Light Sport to pretty sporty
Super Cub
types.

The Cubcrafters stuff is Super Cub derivative and much updated, a fine
plane but with no commonality with the original cub.


Cub clones are also popular with home builders.


Are you aware of any that aren't super cub based?


I stopped paying attention a long time ago, but I do remember a
company that produced the super and the original. I don't recall if they
provided full kits or just the fuselage frames.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #10  
Old October 17th 11, 04:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military,alt.vacation.las-vegas
Aceâ™ 
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default General Aviation Dead?

On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:30:47 -0500, Dan wrote:

I stopped


Get the **** out of alt.vacation.las-vegas asshole.

A*
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For those in General Aviation. Darren Piloting 2 October 7th 05 04:36 PM
For those in General Aviation. Darren Owning 1 October 7th 05 11:22 AM
For those in General Aviation. Darren Products 0 October 7th 05 04:42 AM
For those in General Aviation. Darren Aviation Marketplace 0 October 7th 05 04:42 AM
ENHANCED AVIATION SECURITY PACKAGE ANNOUNCED (All "General Aviation Pilots" to Pay $200.00 every two years!) www.agacf.org Piloting 4 December 21st 03 09:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.