Thread hijack

On Oct 25, 9:36*am, "vaughn" wrote:
"Andy" wrote in message

...

At least twice in the last month someone has renamed a thread to make
a post about a completely unrelated subject. *Of course this causes
the original thread to disappear.

Original thread disappear because someone renamed it? *Not on my computer!

Vaughn

Does not appear in thread list except as the new name. Thus the
original thread has disappeared unless one knows to open the thread
with the new name.

Are you saying that you see both the original named thread, and the
newly named thread, as separate items in the thread list? If so, what
reader are you using?


Andy

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:58:23 -0500, Andy wrote:

On Oct 25, 9:36 am, "vaughn" wrote:
"Andy" wrote in message

...

At least twice in the last month someone has renamed a thread to make
a post about a completely unrelated subject. Of course this causes
the original thread to disappear.

Original thread disappear because someone renamed it? Not on my
computer!

Vaughn

Does not appear in thread list except as the new name. Thus the
original thread has disappeared unless one knows to open the thread
with the new name.

Are you saying that you see both the original named thread, and the
newly named thread, as separate items in the thread list? If so, what
reader are you using?


Andy
On my computer, the thread stays put, even if renamed. I'm using the
Opera reader.

--
Stefan Murry

"S. Murry" wrote in message
news
On my computer, the thread stays put, even if renamed. I'm using the Opera
reader.

Same deal with Outlook Express. It just leaves the renamed thread buried down
inside the original thread.

Vaughn

On Oct 25, 1:08*pm, "vaughn" wrote:

Same deal with Outlook Express. *It just leaves the renamed thread buried down
inside the original thread.

Vaughn

Google shows the name change, and by whom, in the thread at the point
of the change. Mr. Vaughn changed the name of this thread (using
Outlook Express). I cannot do that using Google.

It would seem like a bad feature to have (confuses the innocent like
in our example above) but this cannot be removed from Network News
feature set at this point even though Google saw fit to remove the
ability from their implementation.

- John

On Oct 25, 11:17*am, ContestID67 wrote:
*I cannot do that using Google.

Sure you can - just select "edit subject". As I did to this one using
Google groups.

The question is - why would anyone do that if they wanted to start a
discussion on a completely unrelated topic?

Andy

Interesting, I am using gliderpilot.net and don't usually view the threads.
Instead I pick a post and then go to the "first in thread" and then in
order as they were written. When the name changes it just continues on
with the new name however, which ever post I am on , if I reply it carries
the thread name it had in that post. I guess you could "restore the name
that way

CH

At 18:17 25 October 2011, ContestID67 wrote:
On Oct 25, 1:08=A0pm, "vaughn" wrote:

Same deal with Outlook Express. =A0It just leaves the renamed thread
buri=
ed down
inside the original thread.

Vaughn

Google shows the name change, and by whom, in the thread at the point
of the change. Mr. Vaughn changed the name of this thread (using
Outlook Express). I cannot do that using Google.

It would seem like a bad feature to have (confuses the innocent like
in our example above) but this cannot be removed from Network News
feature set at this point even though Google saw fit to remove the
ability from their implementation.

- John

CH Ventus B

"If we are all "just dust in the wind", then I want to be at the top of a Huge Dust Devil!"

On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:08:08 -0400, "vaughn"
wrote:


"S. Murry" wrote in message
news
On my computer, the thread stays put, even if renamed. I'm using the Opera
reader.

Same deal with Outlook Express. It just leaves the renamed thread buried down
inside the original thread.

I'm using an old (1.21/32 from 1999) version of Free Agent. When the
subject of a follow-up to a message is changed, a separate thread is
created. So the old messages remain under the original thread title,
and the new messages show up under the new title.

But that's only because I have the option checked in the preferences
dialog. Perhaps your newsreaders have a similar option?

-=Dave

On 10/25/2011 10:58 AM, Andy wrote:
On Oct 25, 9:36 am, wrote:
wrote in message

...

At least twice in the last month someone has renamed a thread to make
a post about a completely unrelated subject. Of course this causes
the original thread to disappear.

Original thread disappear because someone renamed it? Not on my computer!

Vaughn

Does not appear in thread list except as the new name. Thus the
original thread has disappeared unless one knows to open the thread
with the new name.

Are you saying that you see both the original named thread, and the
newly named thread, as separate items in the thread list? If so, what
reader are you using?


Andy

In Mozilla Thunderbird, if viewing with the "Unread" option checked, new
entries appear under their most recent title.

Changing the viewing option to "All" shows a thread's entire history,
including any topical name changes.

As I type, since the thread originally titled "IGC Reader for iPhone/Pad" and
subsequently re-named/forked to "Diamant 16.5 - found" shows 9
consecutive-in-time posts under the original name, then 4 consecutive-in-time
posts under the second. Cliff Hilty's post of 10/24 at 4:36PM is the most
recent post under the original name.

Bob W.