A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 26th 04, 05:03 PM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote...

What is "an unmapped part of the A-320's flight control system" supposed
to mean?!?


Airbus hadn't programmed their A-320 to do what the operator commanded.


Hmmm... I suspect that when the pilot added go-around power, he commanded the
airplane to provide maximum lift/minimum sink while the engines spooled up. As
far as we can tell, the flight control system responded properly, providing max
lift without stalling. It is not the job of the flight control system to map
trees, but the trees in the flight path interrupted the plan...


I am quite certain that the A-320's certification included slow flight and
approaches to stalls, and that its flight control system is well able to
handle them.


Then you have departed from reality.


I see... Now you imply that either the A-320 certification did NOT include slow
flight and approaches to stalls, or that it was certified despite its failure to
demonstrate the required controllability in those regimes.

Anyone have the coordinates of reality? I need to punch them into the FMS-CDU
tomorrow...

  #2  
Old February 26th 04, 06:17 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:AFp%b.402349$I06.4378804@attbi_s01...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...

What is "an unmapped part of the A-320's flight control system"

supposed
to mean?!?


Airbus hadn't programmed their A-320 to do what the operator commanded.


Hmmm... I suspect that when the pilot added go-around power, he commanded

the
airplane to provide maximum lift/minimum sink while the engines spooled

up.

In what wy do you believe that stalling the wing is within the flight
envelope?


  #3  
Old February 26th 04, 09:41 PM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote...

Airbus hadn't programmed their A-320 to do what the operator commanded.


Hmmm... I suspect that when the pilot added go-around power, he commanded

the
airplane to provide maximum lift/minimum sink while the engines spooled up.


In what wy do you believe that stalling the wing is within the flight
envelope?


In what way do you believe stalling the wing had anything to do with the late
go-around attempt?

What flight envelope?

  #4  
Old February 27th 04, 12:40 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:rKt%b.418959$na.808977@attbi_s04...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...

Airbus hadn't programmed their A-320 to do what the operator

commanded.

Hmmm... I suspect that when the pilot added go-around power, he

commanded
the
airplane to provide maximum lift/minimum sink while the engines spooled

up.

In what wy do you believe that stalling the wing is within the flight
envelope?


In what way do you believe stalling the wing had anything to do with the

late
go-around attempt?


What?


  #5  
Old February 28th 04, 06:11 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:AFp%b.402349$I06.4378804@attbi_s01...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...

What is "an unmapped part of the A-320's flight control system"

supposed
to mean?!?

Airbus hadn't programmed their A-320 to do what the operator commanded.


Hmmm... I suspect that when the pilot added go-around power, he commanded

the
airplane to provide maximum lift/minimum sink while the engines spooled

up.

In what wy do you believe that stalling the wing is within the flight
envelope?



how did it stall ?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"C-175 SoCal Beware" Original Poster Replies Bill Berle Aviation Marketplace 8 July 8th 04 07:01 AM
More LED's Veeduber Home Built 19 June 9th 04 10:07 PM
Replace fabric with glass Ernest Christley Home Built 38 April 17th 04 11:37 AM
RAN to get new LSD class vessel to replace 5 logistic vessels ... Aerophotos Military Aviation 10 November 3rd 03 11:49 PM
Air Force to replace enlisted historians with civilians Otis Willie Military Aviation 1 October 22nd 03 09:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.