![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The point I was trying to make was that we flew missions with dumb bombs
that were sometimes as accurate as missions flown today with smart bombs. Were there *some* missions flown where *some* aircraft hit within 10 meters ? Sure, but the laws of physics and bomb construction (particularly in the 1940's) mean that those strikes were as much about luck as the skill of the aircrew. Even today, a gravity bomb hit within 30 feet is luck. Most honest radar navs (or WSOs in the B-1B or Mission Commanders in the B-2) will tell you they can get you down to 100 feet with skill, the rest is all luck. The mil dispersion on a Mk-82 is .0025 (Did I get that right ??) which means for every foot it travels, it'll move away from its "true trajectory" by 1/40 inch. If your release distance is 35,000 feet, no matter how well you aim, your weapons will tend to "wonder" by 87.5 feet (35,000 x .0025). So why is it possible to "shack" a target with unguided weapons? Compensating errors. The RN aims 87.5 feet left and the drift tendancy (mil dispersion) of a majority of the weapons is right. So...in summary, any strike you guys had in WWII that were inside of 10 meters, was luck. How many planes in how tight a formation? 2 jets typically, but during OAF, I was in a formation as large as 6 jets. Formation spacing varies, but has no impact since each aircraft (if both are striking the same target) independantly targets its weapons. In the case of Batajanica, all you see are my weapons, my lead aircraft hit the second runway which you can almost see in the upper left hand part of the imagery. Looks a bit loose. What was the intervelometer interval? Loose? Hmm, thats 45 weapons, the interval was set to the min (.050) with the externals timed to drop simultaneously. IIRC, it was a 700' train. That's about as tight as it gets with 45 weapons. You can drop in RAPID mode and reduce your train in about a half to a third, but this is not a common practice. I note that there was a hole in the bomb pattern that left one bullding standing Someone out of formation or a delay in a release? Mil dispersion saves a single building. Chances are, anyone in it has white hair and is deaf. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: How accurate was B-26 bombing?
From: (BUFDRVR) Date: 2/29/04 6:55 PM Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Thanks for the rundown Were there *some* missions flown where *some* aircraft hit within 10 meters ? Sure, but the laws of physics and bomb construction (particularly in the 1940's) mean that those strikes were as much about luck as the skill of the aircrew. Even today, a gravity bomb hit within 30 feet is luck. Most honest radar navs (or WSOs in the B-1B or Mission Commanders in the B-2) will tell you they can get you down to 100 feet with skill, the rest is all luck. The mil dispersion on a Mk-82 is .0025 (Did I get that right ??) which means for every foot it travels, it'll move away from its "true trajectory" by 1/40 inch. If your release distance is 35,000 fee no matter how well you aim, your weapons will tend to "wonder" by 87.5 feet (35,000 x .0025). So why is it possible to "shack" a target with unguided weapons? Compensating errors. The RN aims 87.5 feet left and the drift tendancy (mil dispersion) of a majority of the weapons is right. So...in summary, any strike you guys had in WWII that were inside of 10 meters, was luck. I am sure everuything uou say is true. But I stand by the strike photos on my website whicxh as oiyu can see a lot of "shacks" were soc red under diffiut coimvat ciditrions. Thg ephotos donlt liere striking the same target) independantly targets its weapons. In the case of Batajanica, all you see are my weapons, my lead aircraft hit the second runway which you can almost see in the upper left hand part of the imagery. Yup. I inndersyand now. Looks good. I note that there was a hole in the bomb pattern that left one bullding standing Someone out of formation or a delay in a release? Mil dispersion saves a single building. Chances are, anyone in it has white hair and is deaf. Dead probably . I wasn't being critical, I just wanted to know. Thanks for the info. I never did know how operations were done these days. A lot has changed. But as I said I'llet the strike photos on my website speak for themselves for everyone to see.. Arthur Kramer 344th BG 494th BS England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am sure everything you say is true. But I stand by the strike photos on my
website which as you can see a lot of "shacks" were scored under difficult coimbat conditions. The photos don't lie How many B-26 dropped on the bridge? I've already said that *some* aircraft will be able to get "shacks", but depending on your CEP, that percentage should be no more than 20-25% (maybe less if your CEP is large enough). So...if you fly a 100 aircraft raid up to as many as 25 aircraft (CEP depending) will shack the target. *However*, another 25% will exceed your CEP by a magnitude of 2 for every shack. Bottom line: You can't see CEP in one or even a dozen BDA photos. BUFDRVR "Stay on the bomb run boys, I'm gonna get those bomb doors open if it harelips everyone on Bear Creek" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Originator of Strategic Bombing? | W. D. Allen Sr. | Military Aviation | 10 | February 12th 04 05:24 PM |
Area bombing is not a dirty word. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 82 | February 11th 04 02:10 PM |
WW2 bombing | Bernardz | Military Aviation | 10 | January 14th 04 01:07 PM |
Local veteran was part of final WW II bombing | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 28th 03 10:04 PM |
Looking for Info. on Vietnam Bombing | Seraphim | Military Aviation | 0 | October 19th 03 01:52 AM |