![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/22/2011 9:23 PM, Chris Richardson wrote:
Rule #2: Avoid extreme-range zoom lenses that promise to do it all for you. I don't know, my Canon 100mm-400mm USM IS L does a tolerable job. -- Dale G Elhardt Cypress Ca I welcome change. But I prefer bills. http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=7702 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 May 2011 15:57:48 -0700, the Legend of LAX wrote:
I don't know, my Canon 100mm-400mm USM IS L does a tolerable job. 100-400mm is not an extreme range. By extreme range I am referring to zoom lenses that attempt to capture both the wide angle and the telephoto focal lengths, e.g. 24-200mm. (I assume that 35-50mm is the dividing point between wide angle and telephoto.) 100-400mm is within the telephoto focal lengths and so the design of this lens is not that difficult (comparatively speaking.) But any serious consumer should always check the MTF data for the lens in question. Most manufacturers provide this data somewhere, but independent MTF test data is the best. Buying a lens is always something of a gamble. The on-line reviews are not at all reliable, and any model of lens will exhibit variation due to differences in manufacturing. Even MTF can be unreliable because some MTF data is based on simulation rather than actual testing. I hate to sound pessimistic. I suppose that unless one is obsessed with quality most high-end lenses will do a good job. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "the Legend of LAX" wrote in message ... On 5/22/2011 9:23 PM, Chris Richardson wrote: Rule #2: Avoid extreme-range zoom lenses that promise to do it all for you. I don't know, my Canon 100mm-400mm USM IS L does a tolerable job. -- Dale G Elhardt Cypress Ca I welcome change. But I prefer bills. http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=7702 No argument about great picture quality. There may be an issue with the price of such a lens, however. I just checked on Amazon and the Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM is quoted at $1,649 down from a list price of $2,700 WOW!!!! Cheers, Indrek Aavisto -- Criticism is easy; achievement is difficult W.S. Churchill |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/24/2011 7:34 AM, Indrek wrote:
"the Legend of LAX" wrote in message ... On 5/22/2011 9:23 PM, Chris Richardson wrote: Rule #2: Avoid extreme-range zoom lenses that promise to do it all for you. I don't know, my Canon 100mm-400mm USM IS L does a tolerable job. -- Dale G Elhardt Cypress Ca I welcome change. But I prefer bills. http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=7702 No argument about great picture quality. There may be an issue with the price of such a lens, however. I just checked on Amazon and the Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM is quoted at $1,649 down from a list price of $2,700 WOW!!!! Cheers, Indrek Aavisto That's about right. I paid about $1400 for it a few years (holy cow! has it been seven years already?) ago from B&H. -- Dale G Elhardt Cypress Ca I welcome change. But I prefer bills. http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=7702 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Camera mounts for small digital camera | kestrel254 | Soaring | 5 | August 19th 08 04:03 PM |
Good airshow lens? | Peter.D.Evans | Aviation Photos | 27 | October 30th 07 01:08 AM |
right place, wrong lens.... | Tom Callahan | Aviation Photos | 1 | May 2nd 07 01:27 AM |
Contact lens and medical | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 37 | December 17th 06 10:25 PM |
Aviation Through A Lens Part 2 | Jay Beckman | Piloting | 6 | January 19th 06 03:26 PM |