A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 4th 04, 10:39 PM
Joe Osman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "John Mullen"
Date: 3/1/04 11:05 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"Mike Marron" wrote in message
.. .
(BUFDRVR) wrote:

I doubt it. Art's memeories are so twisted and distorted, either by

time
or his
God awful personality (or both?), that anything coming out his mouth

or
keyboard should immediately disregarded.

Exactly. Art has absolutely no business posting his insane WW2
gibberish on Usenet and instead he should be working on leather
crafts and paint-by-number projects in some VA hospital mental
ward or nursing home while under constant 24/7 adult supervision.


Personally although I don't always agree with Art, I find the majority of
his posts far more interesting and on-topic than yours.

John


Thank you John. Friends are hard to find around here. (sigh)




Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer


Art, is there a chance that you are confusing the State Guards of WWII with
the National Guard?

The State Guard units (not part of the National Guard)
were authorized by a Federal Act of October 21, 1940. This act prohibited
State Guard units from being called, drafted, or ordered into Federal
service nor could these troops be ordered to serve outside the boundaries of
their own states. All but 4 states had State Guards and there were 90,000
men in these units by December 7, 1941. They lasted all through the war,
with California having 6,000 in its State Guard as late as 1944. Most of
this info is from http://www.2-185armor.com/CASMRHist1.htm.

Due to the large number of National Guardsmen being activated today these
types of units are being resurrected, but are usually called State Defense
Forces now. See http://www.sgaus.org/.

During the Civil War, a lot of southern men were in these types of units,
which could only be activated by the state's governer. This reduced the
manpower of the Confederate Army substantially, and members of these units
were looked upon as slackers by Confederate soldiers.

Joe




-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #2  
Old March 5th 04, 12:08 AM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "Joe Osman"
Date: 3/4/04 2:39 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "John Mullen"

Date: 3/1/04 11:05 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"Mike Marron" wrote in message
.. .
(BUFDRVR) wrote:

I doubt it. Art's memeories are so twisted and distorted, either by

time
or his
God awful personality (or both?), that anything coming out his mouth

or
keyboard should immediately disregarded.

Exactly. Art has absolutely no business posting his insane WW2
gibberish on Usenet and instead he should be working on leather
crafts and paint-by-number projects in some VA hospital mental
ward or nursing home while under constant 24/7 adult supervision.


Personally although I don't always agree with Art, I find the majority of
his posts far more interesting and on-topic than yours.

John


Thank you John. Friends are hard to find around here. (sigh)




Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer


Art, is there a chance that you are confusing the State Guards of WWII with
the National Guard?

The State Guard units (not part of the National Guard)
were authorized by a Federal Act of October 21, 1940. This act prohibited
State Guard units from being called, drafted, or ordered into Federal
service nor could these troops be ordered to serve outside the boundaries of
their own states. All but 4 states had State Guards and there were 90,000
men in these units by December 7, 1941. They lasted all through the war,
with California having 6,000 in its State Guard as late as 1944. Most of
this info is from http://www.2-185armor.com/CASMRHist1.htm.

Due to the large number of National Guardsmen being activated today these
types of units are being resurrected, but are usually called State Defense
Forces now. See http://www.sgaus.org/.

During the Civil War, a lot of southern men were in these types of units,
which could only be activated by the state's governer. This reduced the
manpower of the Confederate Army substantially, and members of these units
were looked upon as slackers by Confederate soldiers.

Joe


Well it was called the "Guard" and it was statewide. But isn't the National
Guard a statewide service? ,. All I know is that guys went into the "Guard" and
never went to war and everyone hated them for it..Please explain further.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

  #3  
Old March 5th 04, 04:01 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "Joe Osman"
Date: 3/4/04 2:39 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "John Mullen"

Date: 3/1/04 11:05 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"Mike Marron" wrote in message
.. .
(BUFDRVR) wrote:

I doubt it. Art's memeories are so twisted and distorted, either by

time
or his
God awful personality (or both?), that anything coming out his

mouth
or
keyboard should immediately disregarded.

Exactly. Art has absolutely no business posting his insane WW2
gibberish on Usenet and instead he should be working on leather
crafts and paint-by-number projects in some VA hospital mental
ward or nursing home while under constant 24/7 adult supervision.


Personally although I don't always agree with Art, I find the majority

of
his posts far more interesting and on-topic than yours.

John


Thank you John. Friends are hard to find around here. (sigh)




Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer


Art, is there a chance that you are confusing the State Guards of WWII

with
the National Guard?

The State Guard units (not part of the National Guard)
were authorized by a Federal Act of October 21, 1940. This act prohibited
State Guard units from being called, drafted, or ordered into Federal
service nor could these troops be ordered to serve outside the boundaries

of
their own states. All but 4 states had State Guards and there were 90,000
men in these units by December 7, 1941. They lasted all through the war,
with California having 6,000 in its State Guard as late as 1944. Most of
this info is from http://www.2-185armor.com/CASMRHist1.htm.

Due to the large number of National Guardsmen being activated today these
types of units are being resurrected, but are usually called State

Defense
Forces now. See http://www.sgaus.org/.

During the Civil War, a lot of southern men were in these types of units,
which could only be activated by the state's governer. This reduced the
manpower of the Confederate Army substantially, and members of these

units
were looked upon as slackers by Confederate soldiers.

Joe


Well it was called the "Guard" and it was statewide. But isn't the

National
Guard a statewide service? ,. All I know is that guys went into the

"Guard" and
never went to war and everyone hated them for it..Please explain further.


You are still way off-base. He was referring to the State Guard (as some
states called it, others using the outright term State Militia) which was
formed to provide the kind of "homeland defense" services that the National
Guard had provided to its states before it was mobilized in late 1940-early
1941. Once placed in federal service, the states lost all control of the
National Guard units they had--by early spring in 1941 there were NO
National Guard units remaining; they had all reported off to the various
federal mobilization centers to begin training up for wartime overseas
service. Some left early--units from New Mexico went to the Philippines in
mid/late 1941, for example, which is why Guardsmen were included in the
roles of the Bataan Death March. Those "State Guard" forces that were formed
by the seperate states were made up of those too old, too young, or already
excepted from service dur to their civilian occupations being considered
critical to support the war effort; being in the State Guard was NOT a way
to avoid federal military service, since any able bodied member who did not
have a deferment was still subject to the draft. After the war most of these
state militia organizations faded away, though a few states kept them
running at one level or another. During the 1980's, when the states realized
how dependent the Army and Air Force were on their respective National Guard
components, many states resurrected these militia forces to ensure they had
a ready force able to help out if their National Guard units were
federalized.

This is about the sixth time the fact that the National Guard was in its
*entirety* federalized well before you even finished high school has been
"explained further" to you--I doubt this attempt will fare any better than
the previous ones.

Brooks


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer



  #4  
Old March 5th 04, 04:22 AM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(ArtKramr) writes:
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "Joe Osman"

Date: 3/4/04 2:39 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: "John Mullen"

Date: 3/1/04 11:05 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

"Mike Marron" wrote in message
.. .
(BUFDRVR) wrote:

I doubt it. Art's memeories are so twisted and distorted, either by

time
or his
God awful personality (or both?), that anything coming out his mouth

or
keyboard should immediately disregarded.

Exactly. Art has absolutely no business posting his insane WW2
gibberish on Usenet and instead he should be working on leather
crafts and paint-by-number projects in some VA hospital mental
ward or nursing home while under constant 24/7 adult supervision.


Personally although I don't always agree with Art, I find the majority of
his posts far more interesting and on-topic than yours.

John


Thank you John. Friends are hard to find around here. (sigh)




Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer


Art, is there a chance that you are confusing the State Guards of WWII with
the National Guard?

The State Guard units (not part of the National Guard)
were authorized by a Federal Act of October 21, 1940. This act prohibited
State Guard units from being called, drafted, or ordered into Federal
service nor could these troops be ordered to serve outside the boundaries of
their own states. All but 4 states had State Guards and there were 90,000
men in these units by December 7, 1941. They lasted all through the war,
with California having 6,000 in its State Guard as late as 1944. Most of
this info is from http://www.2-185armor.com/CASMRHist1.htm.

Due to the large number of National Guardsmen being activated today these
types of units are being resurrected, but are usually called State Defense
Forces now. See http://www.sgaus.org/.

During the Civil War, a lot of southern men were in these types of units,
which could only be activated by the state's governer. This reduced the
manpower of the Confederate Army substantially, and members of these units
were looked upon as slackers by Confederate soldiers.

Joe


Well it was called the "Guard" and it was statewide. But isn't the National
Guard a statewide service? ,. All I know is that guys went into the "Guard" and
never went to war and everyone hated them for it..Please explain further.


Art, the National Guard as we know it today was pretty much
established under the Militia Act of 1903, which required that the
various units of teh Organized Militia of the various States had to
conform to U.S. Army standards of equipment, organization, and
training, Federal control was tightened throughout the decade
following, and the National Guard was made part of the United States
Army via the National Defence Act of 1914. This recognized 4 elements
of the land forces of the U.S,: The Regular Army, the National Guard,
the Reserve Corps, and the wartime Volunteer Army. (The regular Army
was made up of Career Soldiers. The National Guard was the part-time
reserve, organized into units housed by the States and available to
the Governors of those States. The Reserve Corps was part-time
soldiers not formed into units, The Volunteer Army was to have been
the units formed during wartime expansion of the Army. By the time of
the U.S. ENtry into the FIrst World War, the Volunteer Army was
replaced by the National Army, which was made up of people inducted
via the Draft. The Federal GOvernment gained the power to appoint all
Officers in 1914.

(As an aside, Regular Army units are distinguished by Division numbers
running from 1 through 25, and Regimental designations running from
1-100. National Guard Division numerical designations run from 26-62,
and Regiments from 100-168. National Army units had Division and
Regemntal numbers higher than these. So any Division between 26 adn
62 (That actual Highest number activated was 45) was a National Guard
Division.)

In August 1918, all Active Units (Regulars, Activated Guard Units, and
National Army) were fused inot the same organization. One they're
called up or activated, they're considered completely intergangable
with the Regular Army.

The National Guard was called up beginning in February 1940, and was
not released until Nov/Dec. 1945.

Most of this is from the "Infantry" volume of the Army Lineage Series,
Mahon and Danysh, Office of teh Chief of Military History, Washington
D.C., 1972, and "World War II Order of Battle", Stanton, Galahad, NY,
NY, 1991.

--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
  #5  
Old March 5th 04, 05:32 AM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: (Peter Stickney)
Date: 3/4/04 8:22 PM Pacific Standard Time


Personally although I don't always agree with Art, I find the majority of
his posts far more interesting and on-topic than yours.

John


Thank you John. Friends are hard to find around here. (sigh)




Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer


Art, is there a chance that you are confusing the State Guards of WWII with
the National Guard?

The State Guard units (not part of the National Guard)
were authorized by a Federal Act of October 21, 1940. This act prohibited
State Guard units from being called, drafted, or ordered into Federal
service nor could these troops be ordered to serve outside the boundaries

of
their own states. All but 4 states had State Guards and there were 90,000
men in these units by December 7, 1941. They lasted all through the war,
with California having 6,000 in its State Guard as late as 1944. Most of
this info is from http://www.2-185armor.com/CASMRHist1.htm.

Due to the large number of National Guardsmen being activated today these
types of units are being resurrected, but are usually called State Defense
Forces now. See http://www.sgaus.org/.

During the Civil War, a lot of southern men were in these types of units,
which could only be activated by the state's governer. This reduced the
manpower of the Confederate Army substantially, and members of these units
were looked upon as slackers by Confederate soldiers.

Joe


Well it was called the "Guard" and it was statewide. But isn't the

National
Guard a statewide service? ,. All I know is that guys went into the "Guard"

and
never went to war and everyone hated them for it..Please explain further.


Art, the National Guard as we know it today was pretty much
established under the Militia Act of 1903, which required that the
various units of teh Organized Militia of the various States had to
conform to U.S. Army standards of equipment, organization, and
training, Federal control was tightened throughout the decade
following, and the National Guard was made part of the United States
Army via the National Defence Act of 1914. This recognized 4 elements
of the land forces of the U.S,: The Regular Army, the National Guard,
the Reserve Corps, and the wartime Volunteer Army. (The regular Army
was made up of Career Soldiers. The National Guard was the part-time
reserve, organized into units housed by the States and available to
the Governors of those States. The Reserve Corps was part-time
soldiers not formed into units, The Volunteer Army was to have been
the units formed during wartime expansion of the Army. By the time of
the U.S. ENtry into the FIrst World War, the Volunteer Army was
replaced by the National Army, which was made up of people inducted
via the Draft. The Federal GOvernment gained the power to appoint all
Officers in 1914.

(As an aside, Regular Army units are distinguished by Division numbers
running from 1 through 25, and Regimental designations running from
1-100. National Guard Division numerical designations run from 26-62,
and Regiments from 100-168. National Army units had Division and
Regemntal numbers higher than these. So any Division between 26 adn
62 (That actual Highest number activated was 45) was a National Guard
Division.)

In August 1918, all Active Units (Regulars, Activated Guard Units, and
National Army) were fused inot the same organization. One they're
called up or activated, they're considered completely intergangable
with the Regular Army.

The National Guard was called up beginning in February 1940, and was
not released until Nov/Dec. 1945.

Most of this is from the "Infantry" volume of the Army Lineage Series,
Mahon and Danysh, Office of teh Chief of Military History, Washington
D.C., 1972, and "World War II Order of Battle", Stanton, Galahad, NY,
NY, 1991.

--
Pete Stickney



I donlt know Peter. Remember we were kids at the time waiting to be 18 and go
to war. Almost all of us in high school volunteered for either the Army Air
Corps ro the Navy V12 program waiting for our 18th birthday so we could be
called up and start training at flying school. Those very few who went into
the "Guard" were considered cowards and held in contempt and none of them ever
went to war. The stuff you are telling me is quite interesting, but we knew
nothing about that at the time. But thanks for the info.Appreciate it.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

  #6  
Old March 5th 04, 10:02 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Well it was called the "Guard" and it was statewide. But isn't the National
Guard a statewide service? ,. All I know is that guys went into the "Guard" and
never went to war and everyone hated them for it..Please explain further.


He's referring to the State Guard, which replaced the National Guard
when it was--well, nationalized.

Primarily the State Guard did ceremonial stuff. Massachusetts had one
(not every state did) and I remember these "old guys" from WWI popping
their buttons at a Memorial Day parade in Concord MA. They would of
course also have provided some of the traditional services of law
enforcement that in peacetime go to the National Guard.

Anyone who went into the State Guard of WWII (well, I suppose there
were some officers--there always seem to be!) would have been
disqualified from active duty because of age or physical condition. So
"everyone hated them for it" is either a mis-remembering or a
misunderstanding. It was the equivalent of the Home Guard in Britain.

There was an armory at St Aidan's School in Brookline MA that was
outfitted with rolling-block Springfield rifles from the Civil War. I
don't *think* it dated from WWII--more likely WWI--but anything is
possible. One of those 45/70s found its way from St Aidan's collection
into mine. I used it for deer-hunting and plinking rats.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (requires authentication)

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #7  
Old March 5th 04, 01:44 PM
ArtKramr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: Cub Driver
Date: 3/5/04 2:02 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


Well it was called the "Guard" and it was statewide. But isn't the

National
Guard a statewide service? ,. All I know is that guys went into the

"Guard" and
never went to war and everyone hated them for it..Please explain further.


He's referring to the State Guard, which replaced the National Guard
when it was--well, nationalized.

Primarily the State Guard did ceremonial stuff. Massachusetts had one
(not every state did) and I remember these "old guys" from WWI popping
their buttons at a Memorial Day parade in Concord MA. They would of
course also have provided some of the traditional services of law
enforcement that in peacetime go to the National Guard.

Anyone who went into the State Guard of WWII (well, I suppose there
were some officers--there always seem to be!) would have been
disqualified from active duty because of age or physical condition. So
"everyone hated them for it" is either a mis-remembering or a
misunderstanding. It was the equivalent of the Home Guard in Britain.

There was an armory at St Aidan's School in Brookline MA that was
outfitted with rolling-block Springfield rifles from the Civil War. I
don't *think* it dated from WWII--more likely WWI--but anything is
possible. One of those 45/70s found its way from St Aidan's collection
into mine. I used it for deer-hunting and plinking rats.


Well I guess that makes sense. Remember that we were in high school when we
violunteered for the Air Corp, barely 17 years old. We took the primary
entrance exams (I still remember some of the questions).We couldn't be called
to active duty until we were 18, there was a law against it or something, so we
had to wait it out. That wasn't easy since we were getting war news every day
and were eager to go.While we were eager to go, there were those kids among us
who hung back. They had all kinds of plots to keep from being called. One was
to go out to Long Island and get a job in a war plant. Grumman and Fairchild
were out there. GoIng into the "guard" was another. Once we found out that a
kid went into the "guard" instead of volunteering with us for either the Army
AIr Corp or the Navy V-12 program that kid didn't have a friend in the world.
We had had representatives from both the Air Corps and the V-12 programs come
out to talk to us urging us to volunteer for their forces, They came out in
full uniform covered with wngs and ribbons telling us all we could for our
country if we flew with them. To a bunch of high school kids it was all to
glamourious for words.. No one was left unimpressed. We couldn't wait to go.
Well we went soon enough but our eagerness never waned from the time went in to
the time we went into action. We all shared the same fear that the war would
end before we got there. Except for the kids who went into the "guard" or those
who got defferments doing war work. But they were never one of us. And never
would be.


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

  #8  
Old March 5th 04, 02:04 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ArtKramr" wrote in message
...
Subject: Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard
From: Cub Driver
Date: 3/5/04 2:02 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:


Well it was called the "Guard" and it was statewide. But isn't the

National
Guard a statewide service? ,. All I know is that guys went into the

"Guard" and
never went to war and everyone hated them for it..Please explain

further.

He's referring to the State Guard, which replaced the National Guard
when it was--well, nationalized.

Primarily the State Guard did ceremonial stuff. Massachusetts had one
(not every state did) and I remember these "old guys" from WWI popping
their buttons at a Memorial Day parade in Concord MA. They would of
course also have provided some of the traditional services of law
enforcement that in peacetime go to the National Guard.

Anyone who went into the State Guard of WWII (well, I suppose there
were some officers--there always seem to be!) would have been
disqualified from active duty because of age or physical condition. So
"everyone hated them for it" is either a mis-remembering or a
misunderstanding. It was the equivalent of the Home Guard in Britain.

There was an armory at St Aidan's School in Brookline MA that was
outfitted with rolling-block Springfield rifles from the Civil War. I
don't *think* it dated from WWII--more likely WWI--but anything is
possible. One of those 45/70s found its way from St Aidan's collection
into mine. I used it for deer-hunting and plinking rats.


Well I guess that makes sense. Remember that we were in high school when

we
violunteered for the Air Corp, barely 17 years old. We took the primary
entrance exams (I still remember some of the questions).We couldn't be

called
to active duty until we were 18, there was a law against it or something,

so we
had to wait it out. That wasn't easy since we were getting war news every

day
and were eager to go.While we were eager to go, there were those kids

among us
who hung back. They had all kinds of plots to keep from being called. One

was
to go out to Long Island and get a job in a war plant. Grumman and

Fairchild
were out there. GoIng into the "guard" was another. Once we found out that

a
kid went into the "guard" instead of volunteering with us for either the

Army
AIr Corp or the Navy V-12 program that kid didn't have a friend in the

world.
We had had representatives from both the Air Corps and the V-12 programs

come
out to talk to us urging us to volunteer for their forces, They came out

in
full uniform covered with wngs and ribbons telling us all we could for

our
country if we flew with them. To a bunch of high school kids it was all

to
glamourious for words.. No one was left unimpressed. We couldn't wait to

go.
Well we went soon enough but our eagerness never waned from the time went

in to
the time we went into action. We all shared the same fear that the war

would
end before we got there. Except for the kids who went into the "guard" or

those
who got defferments doing war work. But they were never one of us. And

never
would be.


Geeze, you just don't GET it, do you? As Cub Driver has politley informed
you, going into the State Guard did NOT get your buddy a deferment. Where
you got that idea I have no idea; for that matter, how you grew up and lived
through that period without realizing that your local National Guard unit,
like every other one from across the country, had been inducted into federal
service when you were, oh...fifteen or sixteen years old says something
about your qulaifications to make (baseless) pronouncements about the Guard,
be it the National variety or your state militia force.

Brooks



Arthur Kramer



  #9  
Old March 8th 04, 09:10 PM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(ArtKramr) wrote in message ...

snip

Well I guess that makes sense. Remember that we were in high school

when we
violunteered for the Air Corp, barely 17 years old. We took the

primary
entrance exams (I still remember some of the questions).We couldn't

be called
to active duty until we were 18, there was a law against it or

something, so we
had to wait it out. That wasn't easy since we were getting war news

every day
and were eager to go.While we were eager to go, there were those kids

among us
who hung back. They had all kinds of plots to keep from being called.

One was
to go out to Long Island and get a job in a war plant. Grumman and

Fairchild
were out there. GoIng into the "guard" was another. Once we found out

that a
kid went into the "guard" instead of volunteering with us for either

the Army
AIr Corp or the Navy V-12 program that kid didn't have a friend in

the world.

Wow, what an ignorant bunch of kids you were. You weren't even sure
what the hell the kid's plans were (other than he was going into this
"guard" you've dreamed up), and you alienated him.

We had had representatives from both the Air Corps and the V-12

programs come
out to talk to us urging us to volunteer for their forces, They came

out in
full uniform covered with wngs and ribbons telling us all we could

for our
country if we flew with them. To a bunch of high school kids it was

all to
glamourious for words.. No one was left unimpressed. We couldn't

wait to go.
Well we went soon enough but our eagerness never waned from the time

went in to
the time we went into action. We all shared the same fear that the

war would
end before we got there. Except for the kids who went into the

"guard" or those who got defferments doing war work. But they were
never one of us. And never would be.

Yeah, yeah-yeah, yeah-yeah. Jeez, we've heard it from you a hundred
times. You're something special and anyone who didn't join the
service the second they could and get into action ain't ****. Christ,
anytime I run into a vet as arrogant and boastful as you I have to
wonder what they were really like back then.

Michael
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements me Military Aviation 146 January 15th 04 10:13 PM
13 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 December 13th 03 08:47 PM
11 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 11th 03 11:58 PM
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 19th 03 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.