A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

2D thrust vectoring for the F-35A and F-35C?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 5th 04, 04:53 AM
Henry J Cobb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kevin Brooks wrote:
"Henry J Cobb" wrote in message
...
Can you please list all of the air bases the US Air Force has within 600
miles of Taiwan that they can use without needing a permission slip from
a foreign government?


Trust Henry to jump in a day late, a dollar short, and with his skivvies on
fire. We do have one such base in Okinawa, looks to be close to the five to
six hundred mile range. Of course, the PI are a possibility, and they have
no great affection for the PRC, either.


See the bit above about permission slip.

What if we had a war and the US Air Force didn't show up because their
F/A-22s couldn't reach it?


While I sympathize with your position here (and indeed believe the USAF
fighters would likely be a minor contributor in this particular scenario),
you seem to have forgotten some platforms that do indeed have the range to
ensure that the "US Air Force shows up"--B-1, B-2, B-52, Global Hawk,
KC-135/10 (which your USN folks *do* appreciate when they can get them),
etc. And how far was it from the Gulf states to Afghanistan?


How is a B-2 going to keep the PLAAF away from Taiwan without bombing
China and turning a minor conflict into a general war?

Better yet, what if we didn't have a war because the US Navy deterred it?


But how, Henry? By your estimate, we'll only have 20 knot capable ships,
which will still be enroute after it is over...


Given the slow rate the Bush regime is building big deck carriers we may
well end up that way.

Pity we can't cancel those F/A-22s and put the money back in the Navy
where it can be put to some use.

-HJC

  #2  
Old March 5th 04, 05:15 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Henry J Cobb" wrote in message
...
Kevin Brooks wrote:
"Henry J Cobb" wrote in message
...
Can you please list all of the air bases the US Air Force has within 600
miles of Taiwan that they can use without needing a permission slip from
a foreign government?


Trust Henry to jump in a day late, a dollar short, and with his skivvies

on
fire. We do have one such base in Okinawa, looks to be close to the five

to
six hundred mile range. Of course, the PI are a possibility, and they

have
no great affection for the PRC, either.


See the bit above about permission slip.


How much of a permission slip do we need for Okinawa? We are not in the
habit of creating large bases, and keeping them in place, if we can't
operate as we choose out of them.


What if we had a war and the US Air Force didn't show up because their
F/A-22s couldn't reach it?


While I sympathize with your position here (and indeed believe the USAF
fighters would likely be a minor contributor in this particular

scenario),
you seem to have forgotten some platforms that do indeed have the range

to
ensure that the "US Air Force shows up"--B-1, B-2, B-52, Global Hawk,
KC-135/10 (which your USN folks *do* appreciate when they can get them),
etc. And how far was it from the Gulf states to Afghanistan?


How is a B-2 going to keep the PLAAF away from Taiwan without bombing
China and turning a minor conflict into a general war?


Duh. You use the B-2, etc., to hammer the crap out of the targets in the PRC
(like maybe their airbases, huh?). It goes to the level of armed conflict,
we are not going to be ditzing around with them while giving them sanctuary
across the 12-mile limit.


Better yet, what if we didn't have a war because the US Navy deterred

it?

But how, Henry? By your estimate, we'll only have 20 knot capable ships,
which will still be enroute after it is over...


Given the slow rate the Bush regime is building big deck carriers we may
well end up that way.

Pity we can't cancel those F/A-22s and put the money back in the Navy
where it can be put to some use.


Ah, good ol' Henry, firmly convinced he is the only one with a clue--those
danged folks who actually wear the uniform being rather stupid and all, of
course. Go back to SMN and tell everbody again how the LCS has to be able to
change out mission modules at sea, and anything over what, 20 knots is
wasted effort? And how it should have an armament suite that would make an
Iowa BB blush and run in fear, of course. While operating a vertiable fleet
of helos from each one...

Brooks


-HJC



  #3  
Old March 5th 04, 05:53 AM
Henry J Cobb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kevin Brooks wrote:
"Henry J Cobb" wrote in message
...
See the bit above about permission slip.


How much of a permission slip do we need for Okinawa? We are not in the
habit of creating large bases, and keeping them in place, if we can't
operate as we choose out of them.


How many sorties did the Air Force fly out of Saudi Arabia for OIF?

How is a B-2 going to keep the PLAAF away from Taiwan without bombing
China and turning a minor conflict into a general war?


Duh. You use the B-2, etc., to hammer the crap out of the targets in the PRC
(like maybe their airbases, huh?). It goes to the level of armed conflict,
we are not going to be ditzing around with them while giving them sanctuary
across the 12-mile limit.


Like the Korean war?

-HJC

  #4  
Old March 5th 04, 06:16 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Henry J Cobb" wrote in message
...
Kevin Brooks wrote:
"Henry J Cobb" wrote in message
...
See the bit above about permission slip.


How much of a permission slip do we need for Okinawa? We are not in the
habit of creating large bases, and keeping them in place, if we can't
operate as we choose out of them.


How many sorties did the Air Force fly out of Saudi Arabia for OIF?


Very different situation. We *gave* Okinawa back to the Japanese after
kicking their butts in WWII--with the understanding we get to keep the base
there (and use it as we see fit). A bit different from our being essentially
a visitor in SA.


How is a B-2 going to keep the PLAAF away from Taiwan without bombing
China and turning a minor conflict into a general war?


Duh. You use the B-2, etc., to hammer the crap out of the targets in the

PRC
(like maybe their airbases, huh?). It goes to the level of armed

conflict,
we are not going to be ditzing around with them while giving them

sanctuary
across the 12-mile limit.


Like the Korean war?


That would be the place where we learned NOT to do that again. Sorry, Henry,
but you are about fifty years out of date.

Brooks


-HJC



  #5  
Old March 5th 04, 12:26 PM
Thomas Schoene
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kevin Brooks wrote:
"Henry J Cobb" wrote in message
...


How many sorties did the Air Force fly out of Saudi Arabia for OIF?


More than either party will admit, I believe. AWACS, tankers, etc. seem to
have flown from their, though not actual strikers.

Very different situation. We *gave* Okinawa back to the Japanese after
kicking their butts in WWII--with the understanding we get to keep
the base there (and use it as we see fit). A bit different from our
being essentially a visitor in SA.


More importantly, Japan has a similar relationship to Taiwan as the United
States does. Officially it discourages independance, but it has quietly
developed defense ties and would very likely assist in the defense of
Taiwan. They might not actually thrown in combat forces, but Japanese ports
and bases would almost certainly be available, and they might even provide
logistical support.

--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing
special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed)




  #6  
Old March 5th 04, 09:45 PM
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How many sorties did the Air Force fly out of Saudi Arabia for OIF?

More than either party will admit, I believe. AWACS, tankers, etc. seem to
have flown from their, though not actual strikers.


Dont be so sure on that last one. They were finding quite inventive ways as
to what could be classified as a "support" aircraft. It will probably be some
time before it is fully declassified as to what aircraft flew from where, but a
certain country east of Iraq that begins with a J was utilized too.


Ron
Tanker 65, C-54E (DC-4)

  #7  
Old March 5th 04, 09:51 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ron" wrote in message
...
How many sorties did the Air Force fly out of Saudi Arabia for OIF?


More than either party will admit, I believe. AWACS, tankers, etc. seem

to
have flown from their, though not actual strikers.


Dont be so sure on that last one. They were finding quite inventive ways

as
to what could be classified as a "support" aircraft. It will probably be

some
time before it is fully declassified as to what aircraft flew from where,

but a
certain country east of Iraq that begins with a J was utilized too.


It is no secret that the US flew over Israel and Jordan to strike Iraq. The
aircraft carrier parked of Isreal in the Med was a hint. Overflying Saudi
only became an issue after USN kept crashing cruise missiles in the Saudi
Desert.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.