How difficult, Jeb Corliss wing suit stunt?

"Keith W" keithnospoofsplease demon.co.uk wrote:

John Doe wrote:
Dave Doe hard work.ok wrote:
John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

I am not a pilot, but familiar with flight simulation. I
know that gliding limits your ability to control altitude.
This is extremely risky?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...VRJowk#t=80 s

Mainly curious about how difficult that was.
Thanks.

Nearly died a month or so ago, Jan 16th...
http://youtu.be/N2nlVUuDh_o

This is about the trip to the hospital.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejFFy...feature=colike

The fact that he didn't die and that he was able to deploy his
shoot is incredible IMO. If he were clowning around, I might
agree with the prior "unnecessary risks" comment. But he knows
what the risks are. Our special forces take risks like that,
perhaps for a better purpose but not as much fun.

Actually they don't

I can't say for sure how you all do it in the United Kingdom, but
I suspect it's the same as here in the United States...
One reason our special forces troops are subjected to stuff like
waterboarding is to see how they will react/function/operate when
they think they are going to die. A significant risk of death is
not uncommon during a mission.

and anyone taking risks as extreme as that would wash out in the
selection process.

Liberal namby-pamby type? Gays in the military? Difficult to tell
by your posting history since apparently you are nym-shifting.

--














Keith

On 2/11/2012 9:51 AM, John Doe wrote:
you are nym-shifting.

Oh? May we assume that your name is really John Doe then?

Vaughn vaughnsimon gmail.com wrote:

John Doe wrote:

you are nym-shifting.

Oh?

Nym-shifting prevents others from knowing your angle on things. It
also prevents others from ignoring you, until the reader opens
your message and recognizes you. Any UseNet regular should already
know the difference between nym-shifting and using a handle.

May we assume that your name is really John Doe then?

It's called a "handle". The point is whether your persona is
understandable or recognizable, not whether you would like
everybody in the world to call you by your real name.

John Doe wrote:
"Keith W" keithnospoofsplease demon.co.uk wrote:

John Doe wrote:
Dave Doe hard work.ok wrote:
John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

I am not a pilot, but familiar with flight simulation. I
know that gliding limits your ability to control altitude.
This is extremely risky?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...VRJowk#t=80 s

Mainly curious about how difficult that was.
Thanks.

Nearly died a month or so ago, Jan 16th...
http://youtu.be/N2nlVUuDh_o

This is about the trip to the hospital.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejFFy...feature=colike

The fact that he didn't die and that he was able to deploy his
shoot is incredible IMO. If he were clowning around, I might
agree with the prior "unnecessary risks" comment. But he knows
what the risks are. Our special forces take risks like that,
perhaps for a better purpose but not as much fun.

Actually they don't

I can't say for sure how you all do it in the United Kingdom, but
I suspect it's the same as here in the United States...
One reason our special forces troops are subjected to stuff like
waterboarding is to see how they will react/function/operate when
they think they are going to die. A significant risk of death is
not uncommon during a mission.


Indeed but taking unnecessary risks does not improve the
chance of success.

and anyone taking risks as extreme as that would wash out in the
selection process.

Liberal namby-pamby type? Gays in the military?

Hardly, taking unnecessary risks puts the mission in jeopardy
and your drops your comrades in the ****. Special forces
are required to be tough and brave but not suicidal.

Difficult to tell
by your posting history since apparently you are nym-shifting.


I post under my own name and always have.

Keith

"Keith W" wrote:

John Doe wrote:
"Keith W" keithnospoofsplease demon.co.uk wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Dave Doe hard work.ok wrote:
John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

I am not a pilot, but familiar with flight simulation. I
know that gliding limits your ability to control altitude.
This is extremely risky?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...etailpage&v=rF
Qc7VRJowk#t=80s

Mainly curious about how difficult that was. Thanks.

Nearly died a month or so ago, Jan 16th...
http://youtu.be/N2nlVUuDh_o

This is about the trip to the hospital.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejFFy...feature=colike

The fact that he didn't die and that he was able to deploy
his shoot is incredible IMO. If he were clowning around, I
might agree with the prior "unnecessary risks" comment. But
he knows what the risks are. Our special forces take risks
like that, perhaps for a better purpose but not as much fun.

Actually they don't

I can't say for sure how you all do it in the United Kingdom,
but I suspect it's the same as here in the United States...
One reason our special forces troops are subjected to stuff
like waterboarding is to see how they will
react/function/operate when they think they are going to die. A
significant risk of death is not uncommon during a mission.


Indeed but taking unnecessary risks does not improve the chance
of success.

Piddly semantics.

and anyone taking risks as extreme as that would wash out in
the selection process.

Liberal namby-pamby type? Gays in the military?

Hardly, taking unnecessary risks puts the mission in jeopardy
and your drops your comrades in the ****.

That's an entirely different subject.

Special forces are required to be tough and brave but not
suicidal.

Ever hear of "Japan"?

Difficult to tell by your posting history since apparently you
are nym-shifting.


I post under my own name and always have.

You have a grand total of 178 posts to UseNet?

--














Keith

John Doe wrote:
"Keith W" wrote:

John Doe wrote:
"Keith W" keithnospoofsplease demon.co.uk wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Dave Doe hard work.ok wrote:
John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

I am not a pilot, but familiar with flight simulation. I
know that gliding limits your ability to control altitude.
This is extremely risky?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...etailpage&v=rF
Qc7VRJowk#t=80s

Mainly curious about how difficult that was. Thanks.

Nearly died a month or so ago, Jan 16th...
http://youtu.be/N2nlVUuDh_o

This is about the trip to the hospital.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejFFy...feature=colike

The fact that he didn't die and that he was able to deploy
his shoot is incredible IMO. If he were clowning around, I
might agree with the prior "unnecessary risks" comment. But
he knows what the risks are. Our special forces take risks
like that, perhaps for a better purpose but not as much fun.

Actually they don't

I can't say for sure how you all do it in the United Kingdom,
but I suspect it's the same as here in the United States...
One reason our special forces troops are subjected to stuff
like waterboarding is to see how they will
react/function/operate when they think they are going to die. A
significant risk of death is not uncommon during a mission.


Indeed but taking unnecessary risks does not improve the chance
of success.

Piddly semantics.

and anyone taking risks as extreme as that would wash out in
the selection process.

Liberal namby-pamby type? Gays in the military?

Hardly, taking unnecessary risks puts the mission in jeopardy
and your drops your comrades in the ****.

That's an entirely different subject.

Special forces are required to be tough and brave but not
suicidal.

Ever hear of "Japan"?


Yes they lost, one of the reasons being they disdained normal
military rules like providing adequate logistics and defending
supply convoys. They lost an entire army in Burma as a
result.

Difficult to tell by your posting history since apparently you
are nym-shifting.


I post under my own name and always have.

You have a grand total of 178 posts to UseNet?


Rather more than that I think you'll find

Keith

"Keith W" wrote:

John Doe wrote:
"Keith W" wrote:
John Doe wrote:
"Keith W" keithnospoofsplease demon.co.uk wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Dave Doe hard work.ok wrote:
John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

I am not a pilot, but familiar with flight simulation. I
know that gliding limits your ability to control altitude.
This is extremely risky?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...etailpage&v=rF
Qc7VRJowk#t=80s

Mainly curious about how difficult that was. Thanks.

Nearly died a month or so ago, Jan 16th...
http://youtu.be/N2nlVUuDh_o

This is about the trip to the hospital.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejFFy...feature=colike

The fact that he didn't die and that he was able to deploy
his shoot is incredible IMO. If he were clowning around, I
might agree with the prior "unnecessary risks" comment. But
he knows what the risks are. Our special forces take risks
like that, perhaps for a better purpose but not as much fun.

Actually they don't

I can't say for sure how you all do it in the United Kingdom,
but I suspect it's the same as here in the United States...
One reason our special forces troops are subjected to stuff
like waterboarding is to see how they will
react/function/operate when they think they are going to die. A
significant risk of death is not uncommon during a mission.


Indeed but taking unnecessary risks does not improve the chance
of success.

Piddly semantics.

and anyone taking risks as extreme as that would wash out in
the selection process.

Liberal namby-pamby type? Gays in the military?

Hardly, taking unnecessary risks puts the mission in jeopardy
and your drops your comrades in the ****.

That's an entirely different subject.

Special forces are required to be tough and brave but not
suicidal.

Ever hear of "Japan"?


Yes they lost,

lol

Not necessarily because of their suicides. Some Arabs are
suicidal, but even given their lack of technological ability, they
do a lot of damage.

--











one of the reasons being they disdained normal
military rules like providing adequate logistics and defending
supply convoys. They lost an entire army in Burma as a
result.

Difficult to tell by your posting history since apparently you
are nym-shifting.


I post under my own name and always have.

You have a grand total of 178 posts to UseNet?


Rather more than that I think you'll find

Keith

John Doe wrote:
"Keith W" wrote:

John Doe wrote:
"Keith W" wrote:
John Doe wrote:
"Keith W" keithnospoofsplease demon.co.uk wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Dave Doe hard work.ok wrote:
John Doe jdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

I am not a pilot, but familiar with flight simulation. I
know that gliding limits your ability to control altitude.
This is extremely risky?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...etailpage&v=rF
Qc7VRJowk#t=80s

Mainly curious about how difficult that was. Thanks.

Nearly died a month or so ago, Jan 16th...
http://youtu.be/N2nlVUuDh_o

This is about the trip to the hospital.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejFFy...feature=colike

The fact that he didn't die and that he was able to deploy
his shoot is incredible IMO. If he were clowning around, I
might agree with the prior "unnecessary risks" comment. But
he knows what the risks are. Our special forces take risks
like that, perhaps for a better purpose but not as much fun.

Actually they don't

I can't say for sure how you all do it in the United Kingdom,
but I suspect it's the same as here in the United States...
One reason our special forces troops are subjected to stuff
like waterboarding is to see how they will
react/function/operate when they think they are going to die. A
significant risk of death is not uncommon during a mission.


Indeed but taking unnecessary risks does not improve the chance
of success.

Piddly semantics.

and anyone taking risks as extreme as that would wash out in
the selection process.

Liberal namby-pamby type? Gays in the military?

Hardly, taking unnecessary risks puts the mission in jeopardy
and your drops your comrades in the ****.

That's an entirely different subject.

Special forces are required to be tough and brave but not
suicidal.

Ever hear of "Japan"?


Yes they lost,

lol

Not necessarily because of their suicides. Some Arabs are
suicidal, but even given their lack of technological ability, they
do a lot of damage.


And lose every war they fight.

Keith

On 2/11/2012 1:58 PM, Keith W wrote:
John Doe wrote:
"Keith wrote:

John Doe wrote:
"Keith wrote:
John Doe wrote:
"Keith W"keithnospoofsplease demon.co.uk wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Dave Doehard work.ok wrote:
John Doejdoe usenetlove.invalid wrote:

I am not a pilot, but familiar with flight simulation. I
know that gliding limits your ability to control altitude.
This is extremely risky?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...etailpage&v=rF
Qc7VRJowk#t=80s

Mainly curious about how difficult that was. Thanks.

Nearly died a month or so ago, Jan 16th...
http://youtu.be/N2nlVUuDh_o

This is about the trip to the hospital.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejFFy...feature=colike

The fact that he didn't die and that he was able to deploy
his shoot is incredible IMO. If he were clowning around, I
might agree with the prior "unnecessary risks" comment. But
he knows what the risks are. Our special forces take risks
like that, perhaps for a better purpose but not as much fun.

Actually they don't

I can't say for sure how you all do it in the United Kingdom,
but I suspect it's the same as here in the United States...
One reason our special forces troops are subjected to stuff
like waterboarding is to see how they will
react/function/operate when they think they are going to die. A
significant risk of death is not uncommon during a mission.


Indeed but taking unnecessary risks does not improve the chance
of success.

Piddly semantics.

and anyone taking risks as extreme as that would wash out in
the selection process.

Liberal namby-pamby type? Gays in the military?

Hardly, taking unnecessary risks puts the mission in jeopardy
and your drops your comrades in the ****.

That's an entirely different subject.

Special forces are required to be tough and brave but not
suicidal.

Ever hear of "Japan"?


Yes they lost,

lol

Not necessarily because of their suicides. Some Arabs are
suicidal, but even given their lack of technological ability, they
do a lot of damage.


And lose every war they fight.

Keith



John doe is beginning to sound like aren't with his post counts and
body counts.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On 2/11/2012 9:52 AM, John Doe wrote:
"Keith wrote:

snip

Special forces are required to be tough and brave but not
suicidal.

Ever hear of "Japan"?

There's a huge difference between kamikaze missions and special
operations missions.
Special operators plan to return, kamikazes don't. Kamikazes don't need
to be trained beyond the requirements needed to operate their suicide
weapons, special operators are trained to do any mission asked of them
etc. But you probably knew all this and just want to be difficult.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired